Enteral Methadone for Iatrogenic Opioid Withdrawal in Patients with COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Case Series

M. Weiss, H. Swoboda, E. Chen
{"title":"Enteral Methadone for Iatrogenic Opioid Withdrawal in Patients with COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Case Series","authors":"M. Weiss, H. Swoboda, E. Chen","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a2613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale: Patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) often require deep sedation for extended periods of time to facilitate mechanical ventilation. The emergence of COVID-19 resulted in high volume of patients admitted to our tertiary care center with severe ARDS. Many developed withdrawal symptoms upon tapering of continuous sedation and were unable to be safely extubated despite improved ventilator requirements. A protocol using enteral methadone was developed to facilitate tapering of continuous sedation and mitigate the severity of iatrogenic withdrawal. Methods: Data was collected through retrospective chart review of patients treated with protocolized methadone for IWS during 04/2020-08/2020. Inclusion criteria were FiO2 ≤ 60%, PEEP ≤ 12cmH220, ≥ 5 days of continuous fentanyl or hydromorphone (≥100 mcg/hr or 1.5 mg/hr respectively), and approval by the toxicology and addiction medicine service. Those receiving high dose vasopressors, paralytics, or QTc ≥500ms were excluded. Descriptive statistics after initiation of methadone are presented in the following case series. Results: There were 32 patients treated with methadone for IWS during the study period. Of these participants, 90% were male (N=29) with median age of 59 (IQR 52-63.5). Opioid infusions were successfully weaned in 75% of patients (N=24) treated with methadone. Median time to wean continuous opioids after starting methadone was 2.5 days (mean 4.08, IQR 1-5). At the end of the study period, 40% (N=13) of patients died from complications of COVID-19. Of the patients who survived, 7 required tracheostomy placement and 16 were successfully extubated. One patient developed prolonged QT with ectopy and was switched to IV Buprenorphine. She was subsequently weaned off continuous sedation after 5 days. Another patient developed prolonged QT but was able to resume after holding for 48 hours. Conclusion: IWS is a barrier to de-escalation of care in patients with COVID-19 ARDS. IWS is associated with longer ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. Protocolized methadone use can be an effective tool for mitigating IWS as suggested by the findings in this study. This study is limited by the lack of a control group. Future directions include comparison to a matched cohort of patients not treated with methadone. Continued investigation with prospective studies in the context of changing practice guidelines for COVID-19 are also warranted. If methadone is found to be safe and effective in future studies, widespread use could help reduce the strain on ICU resources by COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":388725,"journal":{"name":"TP50. TP050 COVID: NONPULMONARY CRITICAL CARE, MECHANICAL VENTILATION, BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, AND EPI","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP50. TP050 COVID: NONPULMONARY CRITICAL CARE, MECHANICAL VENTILATION, BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, AND EPI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a2613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) often require deep sedation for extended periods of time to facilitate mechanical ventilation. The emergence of COVID-19 resulted in high volume of patients admitted to our tertiary care center with severe ARDS. Many developed withdrawal symptoms upon tapering of continuous sedation and were unable to be safely extubated despite improved ventilator requirements. A protocol using enteral methadone was developed to facilitate tapering of continuous sedation and mitigate the severity of iatrogenic withdrawal. Methods: Data was collected through retrospective chart review of patients treated with protocolized methadone for IWS during 04/2020-08/2020. Inclusion criteria were FiO2 ≤ 60%, PEEP ≤ 12cmH220, ≥ 5 days of continuous fentanyl or hydromorphone (≥100 mcg/hr or 1.5 mg/hr respectively), and approval by the toxicology and addiction medicine service. Those receiving high dose vasopressors, paralytics, or QTc ≥500ms were excluded. Descriptive statistics after initiation of methadone are presented in the following case series. Results: There were 32 patients treated with methadone for IWS during the study period. Of these participants, 90% were male (N=29) with median age of 59 (IQR 52-63.5). Opioid infusions were successfully weaned in 75% of patients (N=24) treated with methadone. Median time to wean continuous opioids after starting methadone was 2.5 days (mean 4.08, IQR 1-5). At the end of the study period, 40% (N=13) of patients died from complications of COVID-19. Of the patients who survived, 7 required tracheostomy placement and 16 were successfully extubated. One patient developed prolonged QT with ectopy and was switched to IV Buprenorphine. She was subsequently weaned off continuous sedation after 5 days. Another patient developed prolonged QT but was able to resume after holding for 48 hours. Conclusion: IWS is a barrier to de-escalation of care in patients with COVID-19 ARDS. IWS is associated with longer ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. Protocolized methadone use can be an effective tool for mitigating IWS as suggested by the findings in this study. This study is limited by the lack of a control group. Future directions include comparison to a matched cohort of patients not treated with methadone. Continued investigation with prospective studies in the context of changing practice guidelines for COVID-19 are also warranted. If methadone is found to be safe and effective in future studies, widespread use could help reduce the strain on ICU resources by COVID-19.
美沙酮治疗COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者医源性阿片类药物戒断:病例系列
理由:严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者通常需要长时间的深度镇静以促进机械通气。COVID-19的出现导致我们三级护理中心收治了大量严重ARDS患者。许多患者在持续镇静逐渐减少后出现戒断症状,尽管呼吸机要求有所改善,但仍无法安全拔管。制定了一项使用肠内美沙酮的方案,以促进持续镇静的逐渐减少和减轻医源性戒断的严重程度。方法:对2020年4月- 2020年8月接受美沙酮治疗IWS的患者进行回顾性图表分析。纳入标准为FiO2≤60%,PEEP≤12cmH220,芬太尼或氢吗啡酮连续用药≥5天(分别≥100 mcg/hr或1.5 mg/hr),并经毒理学和成瘾医学服务部门批准。排除接受高剂量血管加压剂、麻痹剂或QTc≥500ms的患者。开始使用美沙酮后的描述性统计数据呈现在以下病例系列中。结果:研究期间,32例IWS患者接受美沙酮治疗。在这些参与者中,90%为男性(N=29),中位年龄为59岁(IQR 52-63.5)。75%接受美沙酮治疗的患者(N=24)成功戒断阿片类药物输注。开始使用美沙酮后,持续戒断阿片类药物的中位时间为2.5天(平均4.08天,IQR 1-5)。在研究期结束时,40% (N=13)的患者死于COVID-19并发症。在存活的患者中,7例需要气管切开术,16例成功拔管。1例患者出现QT间期延长并异位,改为静脉注射丁丙诺啡。5天后停用持续镇静。另一名患者出现QT延长,但在维持48小时后得以恢复。结论:IWS是COVID-19 ARDS患者护理降级的障碍。IWS与ICU住院时间和机械通气时间延长有关。本研究的发现表明,协议化美沙酮的使用可以成为缓解IWS的有效工具。这项研究因缺乏对照组而受到限制。未来的研究方向包括与未接受美沙酮治疗的患者的匹配队列进行比较。在不断变化的COVID-19实践指南背景下,也有必要继续开展前瞻性研究。如果在未来的研究中发现美沙酮是安全有效的,那么广泛使用美沙酮可以帮助减少COVID-19对ICU资源的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信