Effects of Variations on the Experimental Set-Up on the Motion Response of a Floating Wind Semisubmersible (OC4 Type)

S. Gueydon
{"title":"Effects of Variations on the Experimental Set-Up on the Motion Response of a Floating Wind Semisubmersible (OC4 Type)","authors":"S. Gueydon","doi":"10.1115/iowtc2019-7543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n With their light weights, small components like braces and heave plates and steady trim angle caused by the wind loads acting on the rotor, semisubmersible foundations used as support platform for wind turbines exhibit a complex behaviour where viscous loading play an important role. The work done by the Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration Continued with Correlation (OC5) project has shown that standard engineering tools were not always able to predict accurately the motions of the DeepCwind semisubmersible that were measured in a basin. The correct amplitude of the motions at the natural periods of this system appeared to be difficult to obtain with simulations (especially the low frequency surge, and the pitch resonant motion). In view of the complexity of the system, it was not possible to clearly identify the causes of the differences between the simulations and the model-test results. A follow-on validation campaign was therefore performed at the Maritime Research Institute Netherlands (MARIN) under the MARINET2 project with the same floating substructure, with a focus on better understanding the hydrodynamic loads and reducing uncertainty in the tests by minimizing the system complexity.\n The wind turbine was replaced by a stiff tower with resembling inertia properties. The mooring system was simplified by using taut-spring lines with equivalent linear stiffness in surge. This paper reviews the new tests done with the simplified set-up and examines the differences with previous tests done with more complex test set-ups. The main motivation of this work is to study how variations of an experimental set-up can affect the outcome of tests in a wave basin. To start with, the main parameters of the systems (inertia, hydrostatics, and mooring stiffness) for all set-ups are characterized to check how similar they are. Then the level of damping in all systems is compared. Finally, the paper looks at how well the motion responses of this semisubmersible in waves correlate between all these campaigns.","PeriodicalId":131294,"journal":{"name":"ASME 2019 2nd International Offshore Wind Technical Conference","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASME 2019 2nd International Offshore Wind Technical Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/iowtc2019-7543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

With their light weights, small components like braces and heave plates and steady trim angle caused by the wind loads acting on the rotor, semisubmersible foundations used as support platform for wind turbines exhibit a complex behaviour where viscous loading play an important role. The work done by the Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration Continued with Correlation (OC5) project has shown that standard engineering tools were not always able to predict accurately the motions of the DeepCwind semisubmersible that were measured in a basin. The correct amplitude of the motions at the natural periods of this system appeared to be difficult to obtain with simulations (especially the low frequency surge, and the pitch resonant motion). In view of the complexity of the system, it was not possible to clearly identify the causes of the differences between the simulations and the model-test results. A follow-on validation campaign was therefore performed at the Maritime Research Institute Netherlands (MARIN) under the MARINET2 project with the same floating substructure, with a focus on better understanding the hydrodynamic loads and reducing uncertainty in the tests by minimizing the system complexity. The wind turbine was replaced by a stiff tower with resembling inertia properties. The mooring system was simplified by using taut-spring lines with equivalent linear stiffness in surge. This paper reviews the new tests done with the simplified set-up and examines the differences with previous tests done with more complex test set-ups. The main motivation of this work is to study how variations of an experimental set-up can affect the outcome of tests in a wave basin. To start with, the main parameters of the systems (inertia, hydrostatics, and mooring stiffness) for all set-ups are characterized to check how similar they are. Then the level of damping in all systems is compared. Finally, the paper looks at how well the motion responses of this semisubmersible in waves correlate between all these campaigns.
实验装置变化对浮风半潜船(OC4型)运动响应的影响
作为风力涡轮机支撑平台的半潜式基础,由于其重量轻,支架和升沉板等部件小,并且由于风荷载作用于转子而产生稳定的纵倾角,因此在粘性载荷起重要作用的情况下,其表现出复杂的行为。海上代码对比协作持续相关(OC5)项目所做的工作表明,标准工程工具并不总是能够准确预测在盆地中测量的DeepCwind半潜器的运动。该系统在自然周期的运动的正确幅度似乎很难通过模拟获得(特别是低频浪涌和音高共振运动)。由于系统的复杂性,不可能清楚地确定模拟结果与模型试验结果之间差异的原因。因此,在MARINET2项目下,荷兰海事研究所(MARIN)使用相同的浮动子结构进行了后续验证活动,重点是更好地了解水动力载荷,并通过最大限度地降低系统复杂性来减少测试中的不确定性。风力涡轮机被一个具有类似惯性特性的刚性塔所取代。采用在喘振中具有等效线刚度的绷紧弹簧线来简化系泊系统。本文回顾了使用简化设置完成的新测试,并检查了与以前使用更复杂的测试设置完成的测试的差异。这项工作的主要动机是研究实验设置的变化如何影响波盆中测试的结果。首先,对所有装置的系统的主要参数(惯性、静力学和系泊刚度)进行表征,以检查它们的相似程度。然后比较了各系统的阻尼水平。最后,论文研究了这种半潜式潜艇在波浪中的运动反应在所有这些运动之间的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信