Taekhee Lee, M. Harper, M. Kashon, Larry A Lee, Catherine B Healy, M. Coggins, P. Susi, Andrew O'Brien
{"title":"Silica Measurement with High Flow Rate Respirable Size Selective Samplers: A Field Study.","authors":"Taekhee Lee, M. Harper, M. Kashon, Larry A Lee, Catherine B Healy, M. Coggins, P. Susi, Andrew O'Brien","doi":"10.1093/annhyg/mev081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High and low flow rate respirable size selective samplers including the CIP10-R (10 l min(-1)), FSP10 (11.2 l min(-1)), GK2.69 (4.4 l min(-1)), 10-mm nylon (1.7 l min(-1)), and Higgins-Dewell type (2.2 l min(-1)) were compared via side-by-side sampling in workplaces for respirable crystalline silica measurement. Sampling was conducted at eight different occupational sites in the USA and five different stonemasonry sites in Ireland. A total of 536 (268 pairs) personal samples and 55 area samples were collected. Gravimetric analysis was used to determine respirable dust mass and X-ray diffraction analysis was used to determine quartz mass. Ratios of respirable dust mass concentration, quartz mass concentration, respirable dust mass, and quartz mass from high and low flow rate samplers were compared. In general, samplers did not show significant differences greater than 30% in respirable dust mass concentration and quartz mass concentration when outliers (ratio <0.3 or >3.0) were removed from the analysis. The frequency of samples above the limit of detection and limit of quantification of quartz was significantly higher for the CIP10-R and FSP10 samplers compared to low flow rate samplers, while the GK2.69 cyclone did not show significant difference from low flow rate samplers. High flow rate samplers collected significantly more respirable dust and quartz than low flow rate samplers as expected indicating that utilizing high flow rate samplers might improve precision in quartz measurement. Although the samplers did not show significant differences in respirable dust and quartz concentrations, other practical attributes might make them more or less suitable for personal sampling.","PeriodicalId":342592,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of occupational hygiene","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of occupational hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mev081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
High and low flow rate respirable size selective samplers including the CIP10-R (10 l min(-1)), FSP10 (11.2 l min(-1)), GK2.69 (4.4 l min(-1)), 10-mm nylon (1.7 l min(-1)), and Higgins-Dewell type (2.2 l min(-1)) were compared via side-by-side sampling in workplaces for respirable crystalline silica measurement. Sampling was conducted at eight different occupational sites in the USA and five different stonemasonry sites in Ireland. A total of 536 (268 pairs) personal samples and 55 area samples were collected. Gravimetric analysis was used to determine respirable dust mass and X-ray diffraction analysis was used to determine quartz mass. Ratios of respirable dust mass concentration, quartz mass concentration, respirable dust mass, and quartz mass from high and low flow rate samplers were compared. In general, samplers did not show significant differences greater than 30% in respirable dust mass concentration and quartz mass concentration when outliers (ratio <0.3 or >3.0) were removed from the analysis. The frequency of samples above the limit of detection and limit of quantification of quartz was significantly higher for the CIP10-R and FSP10 samplers compared to low flow rate samplers, while the GK2.69 cyclone did not show significant difference from low flow rate samplers. High flow rate samplers collected significantly more respirable dust and quartz than low flow rate samplers as expected indicating that utilizing high flow rate samplers might improve precision in quartz measurement. Although the samplers did not show significant differences in respirable dust and quartz concentrations, other practical attributes might make them more or less suitable for personal sampling.
通过在工作场所进行并排采样,比较高流速和低流速可吸入尺寸选择性采样器,包括CIP10-R (10 l min(-1))、FSP10 (11.2 l min(-1))、GK2.69 (4.4 l min(-1))、10-mm尼龙(1.7 l min(-1))和Higgins-Dewell型(2.2 l min(-1)),用于可吸入性结晶二氧化硅测量。在美国的八个不同的职业地点和爱尔兰的五个不同的石匠地点进行了抽样。共采集个人样本536份(268对),区域样本55份。呼吸性粉尘质量采用重量分析法测定,石英质量采用x射线衍射分析法测定。比较了高流量和低流量采样器的呼吸性粉尘质量浓度、石英质量浓度、呼吸性粉尘质量和石英质量的比值。一般来说,当从分析中去除异常值(比值3.0)时,样本的呼吸性粉尘质量浓度和石英质量浓度的差异不大于30%。CIP10-R和FSP10样品高于石英检出限和定量限的频率明显高于低流量样品,而GK2.69旋风样品与低流量样品差异不显著。正如预期的那样,高流量采样器比低流量采样器收集到更多的呼吸性粉尘和石英,这表明使用高流量采样器可以提高石英测量的精度。尽管采样器在可吸入粉尘和石英浓度方面没有显示出显著差异,但其他实际属性可能使它们或多或少适合个人采样。