Experimental Comparison of Registration Methods for Multisensor Sar-Optical Data

B. Pinel-Puysségur, Luca Maggiolo, M. Roux, Nicolas Gasnier, David Solarna, G. Moser, S. Serpico, F. Tupin
{"title":"Experimental Comparison of Registration Methods for Multisensor Sar-Optical Data","authors":"B. Pinel-Puysségur, Luca Maggiolo, M. Roux, Nicolas Gasnier, David Solarna, G. Moser, S. Serpico, F. Tupin","doi":"10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9553640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and optical satellite image registration is a field that developed in the last decades and gave rise to a great number of approaches. The registration process is composed of several steps: feature definition, feature comparison and optimization of a geometric transformation between the images. Feature definition can be done using simple traditional filtering or more complex deep learning (DL) methods. In this paper, two traditional approaches and a DL approach are compared. One can then wonder if the complexity of DL is worth to address the registration task. The aim of this paper is to quantitatively compare approaches rooted in distinct methodological areas on two common datasets with different resolutions. The comparison suggests that, although more complex, the DL approach is more precise than traditional methods.","PeriodicalId":315312,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS47720.2021.9553640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and optical satellite image registration is a field that developed in the last decades and gave rise to a great number of approaches. The registration process is composed of several steps: feature definition, feature comparison and optimization of a geometric transformation between the images. Feature definition can be done using simple traditional filtering or more complex deep learning (DL) methods. In this paper, two traditional approaches and a DL approach are compared. One can then wonder if the complexity of DL is worth to address the registration task. The aim of this paper is to quantitatively compare approaches rooted in distinct methodological areas on two common datasets with different resolutions. The comparison suggests that, although more complex, the DL approach is more precise than traditional methods.
多传感器sar光学数据配准方法的实验比较
合成孔径雷达(SAR)与光学卫星图像配准是近几十年来发展起来的一个领域,产生了大量的配准方法。配准过程包括几个步骤:特征定义、特征比较和图像之间几何变换的优化。特征定义可以使用简单的传统过滤或更复杂的深度学习(DL)方法来完成。本文对两种传统方法和深度学习方法进行了比较。人们可能会怀疑DL的复杂性是否值得解决注册任务。本文的目的是定量比较根植于不同方法学领域的两种不同分辨率的共同数据集的方法。比较表明,尽管DL方法更复杂,但它比传统方法更精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信