Response to Extreme Energy Price Changes: Evidence from Ukraine

A. Alberini, Olha Khymych, Milan Ščasný
{"title":"Response to Extreme Energy Price Changes: Evidence from Ukraine","authors":"A. Alberini, Olha Khymych, Milan Ščasný","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3076871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large but temporary price increases are sometimes deployed on days when the demand for electricity is extremely high due to exceptionally warm or cold weather. But what happens when the extreme price changes are permanent? Between January 2013 and April 2016, natural gas and electricity prices in Ukraine increased dramatically (up to 300% of the initial rates). We exploit variation in tariffs over time and across customers to estimate the price elasticity of electricity demand using a panel dataset with monthly meter readings from households in the city of Uzhhorod in Ukraine. We ask three research questions. First, what is the price elasticity of consumption implicit in the response (if any) to these large electricity price changes? Second, is there evidence of heterogeneity in the price elasticity of electricity demand driven by dwelling or household characteristics, or by consumer understanding of block pricing and/or own consumption levels? Third, how quickly do household adjust their consumption after a price change? Histograms of the monthly usage records suggest that our Ukrainian consumers were aware of the increasing block pricing system and responded to marginal prices, with bunching observed at the then-current as well as future block cutoffs. The price elasticity of electricity demand is approximately -0.2 to -0.5, with the bulk of our estimates around -0.3. The elasticity becomes up to 50% more pronounced over the first three months since prices change. We find only limited evidence that persons who are attentive about their consumption levels, their bills, or the tariffs are more responsive to the price changes. The tariff increases do help reduce CO2 emissions, but at a high cost per ton.","PeriodicalId":151913,"journal":{"name":"ChemRN: Energy Policy (Topic)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemRN: Energy Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3076871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

Large but temporary price increases are sometimes deployed on days when the demand for electricity is extremely high due to exceptionally warm or cold weather. But what happens when the extreme price changes are permanent? Between January 2013 and April 2016, natural gas and electricity prices in Ukraine increased dramatically (up to 300% of the initial rates). We exploit variation in tariffs over time and across customers to estimate the price elasticity of electricity demand using a panel dataset with monthly meter readings from households in the city of Uzhhorod in Ukraine. We ask three research questions. First, what is the price elasticity of consumption implicit in the response (if any) to these large electricity price changes? Second, is there evidence of heterogeneity in the price elasticity of electricity demand driven by dwelling or household characteristics, or by consumer understanding of block pricing and/or own consumption levels? Third, how quickly do household adjust their consumption after a price change? Histograms of the monthly usage records suggest that our Ukrainian consumers were aware of the increasing block pricing system and responded to marginal prices, with bunching observed at the then-current as well as future block cutoffs. The price elasticity of electricity demand is approximately -0.2 to -0.5, with the bulk of our estimates around -0.3. The elasticity becomes up to 50% more pronounced over the first three months since prices change. We find only limited evidence that persons who are attentive about their consumption levels, their bills, or the tariffs are more responsive to the price changes. The tariff increases do help reduce CO2 emissions, but at a high cost per ton.
能源价格极端变化的反应:来自乌克兰的证据
由于天气异常温暖或寒冷,电力需求非常高,因此有时会出现大幅但暂时的价格上涨。但如果极端的价格变化是永久性的,会发生什么呢?2013年1月至2016年4月,乌克兰的天然气和电力价格大幅上涨(高达最初价格的300%)。我们利用乌克兰乌日霍罗德市家庭每月电表读数的面板数据集,利用不同时间和不同客户的电价变化来估计电力需求的价格弹性。我们会问三个研究问题。首先,对这些大的电价变化的响应(如果有的话)隐含的消费价格弹性是什么?其次,是否有证据表明,电力需求的价格弹性存在异质性,这是由住宅或家庭特征驱动的,还是由消费者对大宗定价和/或自身消费水平的理解驱动的?第三,价格变化后,家庭调整消费的速度有多快?月度使用记录的直方图表明,我们的乌克兰消费者意识到区块定价系统的增加,并对边际价格做出反应,在当时和未来的区块截止点观察到聚集。电力需求的价格弹性约为-0.2至-0.5,我们估计的大部分在-0.3左右。在价格变化后的前三个月,这种弹性会增加50%。我们发现只有有限的证据表明,那些关注自己的消费水平、账单或关税的人对价格变化的反应更灵敏。提高关税确实有助于减少二氧化碳排放,但每吨的成本很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信