Auditory-visual interaction in a dichotic listening task.

M R Navarro
{"title":"Auditory-visual interaction in a dichotic listening task.","authors":"M R Navarro","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eleven normal adults identified consonant-vowel syllables (CV's) under three conditions after extensive training in the tasks. The auditory condition consisted of the simultaneous presentation of dichotic CV's. The Auditory-Visual I condition was the presentation of dichotic CV's with the simultaneous presentation of a visual CV to both eyes. The visual CV was always the same as one of the two auditory CV's. In the Auditory-Visual II condition, the auditory dichotic and visual CV's were again presented, but the visual CV was radomly varied so that it might or might not be identical to one of the auditory CV's. No significant difference between the right and left ears were found; however, there was a slight numerical superiority, especially in the auditory condition, in favor of the right ear. The presence of a visual stimulus tended to reduce the numerical superiority so that both ears performed more nearly the same. No significant differences were found in the performance of the right ear under the 3 test conditions. The left ear performance, however, tended toward enhancement with the presentation of a noncompeting visual stimulus but was significantly reduced when the visual stimulus competed with the auditory stimulus. A similar pattern was found under a double correct data analysis. Overall auditory performance was significantly poorer than was visual performance regardless of ear or test condition. Finally, error responses were more likely to be placed of articulation errors than voicing errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":76027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Auditory Society","volume":"5 1","pages":"6-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Auditory Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eleven normal adults identified consonant-vowel syllables (CV's) under three conditions after extensive training in the tasks. The auditory condition consisted of the simultaneous presentation of dichotic CV's. The Auditory-Visual I condition was the presentation of dichotic CV's with the simultaneous presentation of a visual CV to both eyes. The visual CV was always the same as one of the two auditory CV's. In the Auditory-Visual II condition, the auditory dichotic and visual CV's were again presented, but the visual CV was radomly varied so that it might or might not be identical to one of the auditory CV's. No significant difference between the right and left ears were found; however, there was a slight numerical superiority, especially in the auditory condition, in favor of the right ear. The presence of a visual stimulus tended to reduce the numerical superiority so that both ears performed more nearly the same. No significant differences were found in the performance of the right ear under the 3 test conditions. The left ear performance, however, tended toward enhancement with the presentation of a noncompeting visual stimulus but was significantly reduced when the visual stimulus competed with the auditory stimulus. A similar pattern was found under a double correct data analysis. Overall auditory performance was significantly poorer than was visual performance regardless of ear or test condition. Finally, error responses were more likely to be placed of articulation errors than voicing errors.

听觉-视觉在二元听力任务中的交互作用。
11名正常成年人在经过广泛的训练后,在三种条件下识别辅音-元音音节(CV's)。听觉条件包括双重CV的同时呈现。听觉-视觉I条件是双眼同时呈现视觉CV。视觉CV总是与两种听觉CV中的一种相同。在听觉-视觉II条件下,再次出现听觉和视觉CV,但视觉CV是随机变化的,因此它可能与听觉CV之一相同,也可能不相同。右耳与左耳之间无显著差异;然而,有轻微的数字优势,特别是在听觉条件下,有利于右耳。视觉刺激的存在倾向于减少数量上的优势,因此两只耳朵的表现更接近相同。在3种测试条件下,右耳的性能没有明显差异。然而,当视觉刺激与听觉刺激竞争时,左耳的表现有增强的趋势,而当视觉刺激与听觉刺激竞争时,左耳的表现明显下降。在双重正确的数据分析中发现了类似的模式。无论耳朵或测试条件如何,整体听觉表现明显低于视觉表现。最后,错误反应更可能是发音错误而不是发音错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信