Asian American responses to Donald Trump’s anti-Asian rhetoric and misuse of the history of Japanese American incarceration

Rachel Pistol
{"title":"Asian American responses to Donald Trump’s anti-Asian rhetoric and misuse of the history of Japanese American incarceration","authors":"Rachel Pistol","doi":"10.1080/14775700.2021.1895038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since 2015, Donald Trump, his administration and supporters have repeatedly abused the history of Second World War Japanese American incarceration. In contrast to preceding Presidents who recognised the miscarriage of justice authorised by Franklin Roosevelt, Trump and his administration have used this history to justify racism. All post-war presidents before Trump, regardless of political affiliation, agreed what happened under Executive Order 9066 was wrong and should never be repeated. Donald Trump and his administration have, by contrast, not only failed to condemn the incarceration but instead attempted to use test cases brought against the United States government during the war as questionable legal precedent to justify racist policies. The travel ban for those travelling to the USA from Muslim majority countries was compared to Executive Order 9066; Trump’s policy of separating migrant children from their parents and placing them in separate detention centres was disturbingly similar to the internment of orphans of Japanese parentage at Manzanar children’s village; and Trump’s use of terms like ‘China virus’ during the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in attacks on Asian Americans. This article considers Asian American responses to these three case studies of Trump’s anti-Asian rhetoric and abuse of the history of Japanese American incarceration.","PeriodicalId":114563,"journal":{"name":"Comparative American Studies An International Journal","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative American Studies An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14775700.2021.1895038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Since 2015, Donald Trump, his administration and supporters have repeatedly abused the history of Second World War Japanese American incarceration. In contrast to preceding Presidents who recognised the miscarriage of justice authorised by Franklin Roosevelt, Trump and his administration have used this history to justify racism. All post-war presidents before Trump, regardless of political affiliation, agreed what happened under Executive Order 9066 was wrong and should never be repeated. Donald Trump and his administration have, by contrast, not only failed to condemn the incarceration but instead attempted to use test cases brought against the United States government during the war as questionable legal precedent to justify racist policies. The travel ban for those travelling to the USA from Muslim majority countries was compared to Executive Order 9066; Trump’s policy of separating migrant children from their parents and placing them in separate detention centres was disturbingly similar to the internment of orphans of Japanese parentage at Manzanar children’s village; and Trump’s use of terms like ‘China virus’ during the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in attacks on Asian Americans. This article considers Asian American responses to these three case studies of Trump’s anti-Asian rhetoric and abuse of the history of Japanese American incarceration.
亚裔美国人对唐纳德·特朗普的反亚裔言论和对日裔美国人监禁历史的滥用的回应
自2015年以来,唐纳德·特朗普及其政府和支持者一再滥用二战期间日裔美国人被监禁的历史。与前几任总统承认富兰克林·罗斯福授权的司法不公不同,特朗普及其政府利用这段历史为种族主义辩护。在特朗普之前的所有战后总统,无论政治派别如何,都认为9066号行政命令下发生的事情是错误的,永远不应该重演。相比之下,唐纳德·特朗普及其政府不仅没有谴责监禁,反而试图利用战争期间针对美国政府的判例,作为可疑的法律先例,为种族主义政策辩护。对从穆斯林占多数的国家前往美国的人的旅行禁令与第9066号行政命令进行了比较;特朗普将移民儿童与父母分开,并将他们安置在单独的拘留中心的政策,与在曼萨纳尔儿童村(Manzanar children’s village)拘留日本孤儿的做法令人不安地相似;特朗普在Covid-19大流行期间使用“中国病毒”等术语导致对亚裔美国人的攻击。这篇文章考虑了亚裔美国人对特朗普反亚裔言论和滥用日裔美国人监禁历史的三个案例的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信