Ideologi Media dan Framing Pada Pemberitaan Perusakan Rumah Ibadah di Kompas dan Republika

Farid Muthaqin, Hamdani M. Syam, Putri Wahyuni
{"title":"Ideologi Media dan Framing Pada Pemberitaan Perusakan Rumah Ibadah di Kompas dan Republika","authors":"Farid Muthaqin, Hamdani M. Syam, Putri Wahyuni","doi":"10.22373/JP.V4I2.10821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to find out how the framing in the news related to the destruction of the Musala in North Minahasa on the news of online  media Kompas.com in the period 30 January to 13 February 2020 and Republika.co.id for the period 30 January 2020 to 12 February 2020. This study uses a qualitative method. descriptive analysis with framing analysis by Robert N. Entman with four elements, namely defining the problem, diagnosing the cause, making moral judgments, and recommending treatment. This study focuses on news about the destruction of the Musala that occurred in North Minahasa. The results show that the framing of the news presented by Kompas.com media is objectivity in reporting the case of the destruction of the Musala in North Minahasa, by not taking sides with certain groups, as well as in explaining that Kompas.com refrains from writing in a safe style, as well as a narrow news perspective. while Republika.co.id is more daring in conveying facts and news that are presented in depth and viewed from various perspectives so that it is possible to find the aspirations of Muslims to get the right to get a Musala as a place of worship. The difference in the frame of the two media is influenced by the ideological factors of each media. Even though they have different framing, these two media want the incident of vandalism of places of worship in North Minahasa to be resolved peacefully.","PeriodicalId":236578,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Peurawi: Media Kajian Komunikasi Islam","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Peurawi: Media Kajian Komunikasi Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22373/JP.V4I2.10821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study aims to find out how the framing in the news related to the destruction of the Musala in North Minahasa on the news of online  media Kompas.com in the period 30 January to 13 February 2020 and Republika.co.id for the period 30 January 2020 to 12 February 2020. This study uses a qualitative method. descriptive analysis with framing analysis by Robert N. Entman with four elements, namely defining the problem, diagnosing the cause, making moral judgments, and recommending treatment. This study focuses on news about the destruction of the Musala that occurred in North Minahasa. The results show that the framing of the news presented by Kompas.com media is objectivity in reporting the case of the destruction of the Musala in North Minahasa, by not taking sides with certain groups, as well as in explaining that Kompas.com refrains from writing in a safe style, as well as a narrow news perspective. while Republika.co.id is more daring in conveying facts and news that are presented in depth and viewed from various perspectives so that it is possible to find the aspirations of Muslims to get the right to get a Musala as a place of worship. The difference in the frame of the two media is influenced by the ideological factors of each media. Even though they have different framing, these two media want the incident of vandalism of places of worship in North Minahasa to be resolved peacefully.
媒体意识形态和框架的宣传破坏了罗盘和共和国的教堂
本研究旨在了解2020年1月30日至2月13日期间,网络媒体Kompas.com和Republika.co.id在2020年1月30日至2月12日期间,与北米纳哈萨穆萨拉(Musala)被毁有关的新闻框架是如何形成的。本研究采用定性方法。罗伯特·恩特曼(Robert N. Entman)的描述性分析和框架分析,包括四个要素,即定义问题、诊断原因、做出道德判断和推荐治疗。这项研究的重点是关于在北米纳哈萨发生的穆萨拉破坏的新闻。结果显示,Kompas.com媒体在报导北米纳哈萨(North Minahasa)穆萨拉(Musala)被毁事件时,呈现的新闻框架是客观的,不偏袒某些团体,并解释Kompas.com避免以安全的风格写作,以及狭隘的新闻视角。而republic .co.id则更大胆地传达事实和新闻,这些事实和新闻从不同的角度进行了深入的呈现,从而有可能发现穆斯林对获得穆萨拉作为礼拜场所的权利的渴望。两种媒体框架的差异受到各自媒体意识形态因素的影响。虽然两家媒体的观点不同,但他们都希望北米纳哈萨州破坏礼拜场所的事件能够和平解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信