Student Feedback on Use of Breakout Rooms

C. Wachenheim, A. Idowu, Erik Hanson
{"title":"Student Feedback on Use of Breakout Rooms","authors":"C. Wachenheim, A. Idowu, Erik Hanson","doi":"10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The widespread use of video platforms has enriched and expanded options for synchronous learning for students attending class remotely including use of breakout rooms as a venue for peer-to-peer discussion. Although groupwork has long been used in face-to-face classes and there exists abundant research on its benefits, research on the use of breakout rooms as a venue for groupwork including students not physically in the classroom is scant. An end-of-term survey was administered to students in two classes taught using a HyFlex system where the instructor was physically present in the classroom with some students while other students participated remotely. Primary characteristics students liked about breakout rooms are that they facilitate student-to-student interaction, especially important during the pandemic, allow peer-to-peer learning and assistance, and keep student attention and interest. Primary characteristics noted as those disliked include lack of participation, that they can be awkward, and when they are poorly designed. Students found breakout rooms most productive when instructors provided clear guidance, students were held accountable for the conversation held in the breakout room, and all students participated.","PeriodicalId":421640,"journal":{"name":"NACTA Journal","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NACTA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread use of video platforms has enriched and expanded options for synchronous learning for students attending class remotely including use of breakout rooms as a venue for peer-to-peer discussion. Although groupwork has long been used in face-to-face classes and there exists abundant research on its benefits, research on the use of breakout rooms as a venue for groupwork including students not physically in the classroom is scant. An end-of-term survey was administered to students in two classes taught using a HyFlex system where the instructor was physically present in the classroom with some students while other students participated remotely. Primary characteristics students liked about breakout rooms are that they facilitate student-to-student interaction, especially important during the pandemic, allow peer-to-peer learning and assistance, and keep student attention and interest. Primary characteristics noted as those disliked include lack of participation, that they can be awkward, and when they are poorly designed. Students found breakout rooms most productive when instructors provided clear guidance, students were held accountable for the conversation held in the breakout room, and all students participated.
学生对分组讨论室使用的反馈
视频平台的广泛使用丰富和扩展了远程上课的学生同步学习的选择,包括使用分组讨论室作为点对点讨论的场所。虽然小组工作在面对面的课堂上已经使用了很长时间,并且有大量关于其好处的研究,但是关于将分组讨论室作为小组工作的场所,包括不在教室里的学生的研究很少。在学期结束时,对使用HyFlex系统的两个班级的学生进行了调查,其中教师亲自在教室里与一些学生在一起,而其他学生则远程参与。学生们喜欢分组讨论室的主要特点是,它们促进了学生与学生之间的互动,这在大流行期间尤其重要,允许同伴之间的学习和帮助,并保持学生的注意力和兴趣。被认为不受欢迎的主要特征包括缺乏参与,他们可能会很尴尬,当他们设计得很糟糕时。学生们发现,当教师提供明确的指导,学生们对讨论室里的谈话负责,所有学生都参与进来时,讨论室最有成效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信