Recollections of the Intensive Care Unit Experience Among Families of Patients with COVID-19

J. Tringali, K. Sarigiannis, C. Herbert, D. Banana, S. Basapur, C. Glover, R. Shah, James I. Gerhart, J. Greenberg
{"title":"Recollections of the Intensive Care Unit Experience Among Families of Patients with COVID-19","authors":"J. Tringali, K. Sarigiannis, C. Herbert, D. Banana, S. Basapur, C. Glover, R. Shah, James I. Gerhart, J. Greenberg","doi":"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RATIONALE: Clinicians typically encourage family presence in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) as a way to improve both patient and family outcomes. To limit the spread of the disease, families were typically prohibited from visiting the ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about the approach clinicians should take when engaging with families in times when they cannot visit the hospital. METHODS: Surrogates of critically ill patients with COVID-19 who participated in a clinical trial at a single academic center were contacted after ICU discharge to participate in a follow up study dealing with their ICU experience. Upon enrollment in this post-ICU discharge study, the subject (surrogate of the ICU patient) completed the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI) questionnaire and participated in a semi-structured telephone interview. The CCFNI questionnaire includes 14 questions dealing with aspects of the ICU experience that are important to family members. The answers to each question range from 1 (almost all the time) to 4 (none of the time), with lower scores indicating a better experience. Telephone interviews were transcribed and coded using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Of the 58 subjects enrolled from September 2020 to December 2020, 23 (40%) respective patients were deceased. Subjects of deceased patients had higher median CCFNI scores than subjects of surviving patients, reflecting greater dissatisfaction with the ICU experience (1.82 [1.45-2.00] vs 1.45 [1.27-1.72], respectively, p=0.009). Subjects recollected that they typically received at least one medical update from the patient's ICU team each day. While many subjects felt that telephone communication with the ICU team was adequate, some believed they were unable to fully understand the patient's condition. In addition, some subjects feared the patient was clinically worsening when they did not receive frequent updates, which had a negative impact on their experience. Nearly all subjects reported that visitor restrictions made the ICU experience more difficult. Some subjects believed that the medical decisions that were made and the care the patient received were negatively impacted by not having family present at the bedside. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, families of critically ill patients typically received medical updates by phone daily because they were unable to visit. These aspects of ICU care delivery had differential effects on the ICU experience of families, with more negative experiences among families of deceased patients. These data suggest that more individualized approach to family engagement is needed during times of visitor restrictions.","PeriodicalId":111156,"journal":{"name":"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP49. TP049 COVID: ARDS AND ICU MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

RATIONALE: Clinicians typically encourage family presence in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) as a way to improve both patient and family outcomes. To limit the spread of the disease, families were typically prohibited from visiting the ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic. Little is known about the approach clinicians should take when engaging with families in times when they cannot visit the hospital. METHODS: Surrogates of critically ill patients with COVID-19 who participated in a clinical trial at a single academic center were contacted after ICU discharge to participate in a follow up study dealing with their ICU experience. Upon enrollment in this post-ICU discharge study, the subject (surrogate of the ICU patient) completed the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI) questionnaire and participated in a semi-structured telephone interview. The CCFNI questionnaire includes 14 questions dealing with aspects of the ICU experience that are important to family members. The answers to each question range from 1 (almost all the time) to 4 (none of the time), with lower scores indicating a better experience. Telephone interviews were transcribed and coded using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Of the 58 subjects enrolled from September 2020 to December 2020, 23 (40%) respective patients were deceased. Subjects of deceased patients had higher median CCFNI scores than subjects of surviving patients, reflecting greater dissatisfaction with the ICU experience (1.82 [1.45-2.00] vs 1.45 [1.27-1.72], respectively, p=0.009). Subjects recollected that they typically received at least one medical update from the patient's ICU team each day. While many subjects felt that telephone communication with the ICU team was adequate, some believed they were unable to fully understand the patient's condition. In addition, some subjects feared the patient was clinically worsening when they did not receive frequent updates, which had a negative impact on their experience. Nearly all subjects reported that visitor restrictions made the ICU experience more difficult. Some subjects believed that the medical decisions that were made and the care the patient received were negatively impacted by not having family present at the bedside. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, families of critically ill patients typically received medical updates by phone daily because they were unable to visit. These aspects of ICU care delivery had differential effects on the ICU experience of families, with more negative experiences among families of deceased patients. These data suggest that more individualized approach to family engagement is needed during times of visitor restrictions.
COVID-19患者家属重症监护病房经历的回忆
理由:临床医生通常鼓励家属在重症监护病房(ICU)作为一种改善患者和家庭结果的方法。为了限制疾病的传播,在COVID-19大流行期间,家庭通常被禁止访问ICU。当家庭不能去医院的时候,临床医生应该采取什么方法,人们知之甚少。方法:在ICU出院后,联系在单一学术中心参加临床试验的COVID-19危重患者的代理人,参与随访研究,处理其ICU经历。在ICU出院后的研究中,受试者(ICU患者的代理人)完成了重症监护家庭需求调查表(CCFNI),并参加了半结构化的电话访谈。CCFNI问卷包括14个问题,涉及对家庭成员重要的ICU经验方面。每个问题的答案范围从1(几乎所有时间)到4(没有时间),分数越低表示体验越好。使用专题内容分析对电话采访进行转录和编码。结果:2020年9月至2020年12月入组的58名受试者中,分别有23名(40%)患者死亡。死亡患者的CCFNI评分中位数高于存活患者,反映出患者对ICU护理体验的更大不满(分别为1.82[1.45-2.00]和1.45 [1.27-1.72],p=0.009)。受试者回忆说,他们通常每天至少从患者的ICU团队收到一次医疗更新。虽然许多受试者认为与ICU团队的电话沟通是充分的,但一些受试者认为他们无法完全了解患者的病情。此外,一些受试者担心,如果他们没有得到频繁的更新,患者的临床病情会恶化,这对他们的体验产生了负面影响。几乎所有的受试者都报告说,访客限制使ICU的体验更加困难。一些研究对象认为,没有家人在床边,做出的医疗决定和病人接受的护理会受到负面影响。结论:新冠肺炎大流行期间,危重患者家属因无法上门就诊,通常每天通过电话接收最新医疗信息。ICU护理交付的这些方面对家属的ICU体验有不同的影响,死亡患者家属的负面体验更多。这些数据表明,在访客限制期间,需要采取更个性化的家庭参与方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信