Evolving Characteristics of Today's Applied Engineering College-Level Educator: 2013 to 2017

J. Ulmer
{"title":"Evolving Characteristics of Today's Applied Engineering College-Level Educator: 2013 to 2017","authors":"J. Ulmer","doi":"10.21061/JOTS.V44I1.A.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This manuscript was created to document faculty, and academic support, issues from 2013 to 2017. The 2013 manuscript was published by the Journal of Technology Studies. This four-years-later study provided greater insight for academics that asked the research question: “What is the latest in our teaching career field?” Issues of concern to faculty included positional status (adjunct, contract, tenure-track, tenure), faculty rank, length of time in current rank, length of time in nonacademic professional work (before or after academic work), primary academic program, total number of students taught per semester, average academic salary, contract length, administrative duties and salary benefits. Other issues included academic professional accreditation, degree levels offered, market pay (competitive) presence, academic freedom, benefits cost of coverage (health insurance, life insurance, etc.), the use of faculty talent, the management of teaching assignments, and the number of credit hours taught per semester. Finally, questions about the percentage of teaching load (face-to-face, hybrid, and online), the ease of resource and support acquisition, expectations for research (scholarship), unique ways that an academic institution compensates beyond the base salary, expectations for promotion and tenure, and additional comments pertinent to an academic’s role in academia. In the 2013 study, 244 people (from 39 states) participated (only 212 responses were valid). This number dropped to 103 people from 27 states in 2017 (only 90 responses were valid). Although the survey population was smaller for 2017, the number of respondents was determined to be sufficient for reporting to other academics in a publication. Significant results in the study from 2013 to 2017 included an increase from 63.86 to 74.45 students taught per semester and a faculty salary mean change from $73,567 to $77,306 per year. Other survey indicators presented minimal change from 2013 to 2017.","PeriodicalId":142452,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Technology Studies","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/JOTS.V44I1.A.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This manuscript was created to document faculty, and academic support, issues from 2013 to 2017. The 2013 manuscript was published by the Journal of Technology Studies. This four-years-later study provided greater insight for academics that asked the research question: “What is the latest in our teaching career field?” Issues of concern to faculty included positional status (adjunct, contract, tenure-track, tenure), faculty rank, length of time in current rank, length of time in nonacademic professional work (before or after academic work), primary academic program, total number of students taught per semester, average academic salary, contract length, administrative duties and salary benefits. Other issues included academic professional accreditation, degree levels offered, market pay (competitive) presence, academic freedom, benefits cost of coverage (health insurance, life insurance, etc.), the use of faculty talent, the management of teaching assignments, and the number of credit hours taught per semester. Finally, questions about the percentage of teaching load (face-to-face, hybrid, and online), the ease of resource and support acquisition, expectations for research (scholarship), unique ways that an academic institution compensates beyond the base salary, expectations for promotion and tenure, and additional comments pertinent to an academic’s role in academia. In the 2013 study, 244 people (from 39 states) participated (only 212 responses were valid). This number dropped to 103 people from 27 states in 2017 (only 90 responses were valid). Although the survey population was smaller for 2017, the number of respondents was determined to be sufficient for reporting to other academics in a publication. Significant results in the study from 2013 to 2017 included an increase from 63.86 to 74.45 students taught per semester and a faculty salary mean change from $73,567 to $77,306 per year. Other survey indicators presented minimal change from 2013 to 2017.
当今应用工程院校教育工作者的演变特征:2013 - 2017
这份手稿是为了记录2013年至2017年的教师和学术支持问题而创建的。2013年的手稿发表在《技术研究杂志》上。这项四年后的研究为提出研究问题的学者提供了更深入的见解:“我们的教学生涯领域的最新进展是什么?”教师关心的问题包括职位地位(兼职、合同、终身教职、终身教职)、教师级别、在职时间、从事非学术性专业工作的时间(在学术工作之前或之后)、主要学术课程、每学期教的学生总数、平均学术工资、合同期限、行政职责和工资福利。其他问题包括学术专业认证、提供的学位水平、市场薪酬(有竞争力的)存在、学术自由、保险福利成本(健康保险、人寿保险等)、教师人才的使用、教学任务的管理以及每学期教的学分数。最后,关于教学负荷百分比(面对面,混合和在线),资源和支持获取的便利性,对研究的期望(奖学金),学术机构在基本工资之外的独特补偿方式,对晋升和终身职位的期望,以及与学者在学术界的角色相关的其他评论的问题。在2013年的研究中,244人(来自39个州)参与了调查(只有212份回复是有效的)。2017年,这一数字降至来自27个州的103人(只有90人回复有效)。尽管2017年的调查人数较少,但被调查者的数量被确定为足以在出版物中向其他学者报告。从2013年到2017年,这项研究取得了显著成果,包括每学期授课的学生从63.86人增加到74.45人,教师的平均工资从每年73567美元增加到77306美元。从2013年到2017年,其他调查指标变化不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信