Portugal Telecom: a new door open for holding companies to deduct input VAT

Nina Aguiar
{"title":"Portugal Telecom: a new door open for holding companies to deduct input VAT","authors":"Nina Aguiar","doi":"10.5235/20488432.2.1.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Sixth Directive, like the VAT Directive today, did not expressly define the VAT status of holding companies, which from the beginning appeared likely to raise complex questions. The ECJ began to delineate that status in 1990 in the Polysar case. The ECJ ruling of September 2012 in the Portugal Telecom case was another brick in the wall, and a significant brick at that. In the Polysar ruling, one piece of the puzzle of the VAT status of holding companies, which had not been clear until then, was finally settled: a pure holding company, meaning a company whose sole object is the mere acquisition and holding of shares in other enterprises, is not a taxable person within the meaning of VAT, because it does not carry on an economic activity. In fact, in the terms of the VAT Directives, ‘taxable person’ means any person who independently carries on an economic activity as defined firstly in the Sixth Directive and now in Article 9 of the VAT Directive. On the other hand, Article 4(2) of the Sixth Direc-","PeriodicalId":114680,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5235/20488432.2.1.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Sixth Directive, like the VAT Directive today, did not expressly define the VAT status of holding companies, which from the beginning appeared likely to raise complex questions. The ECJ began to delineate that status in 1990 in the Polysar case. The ECJ ruling of September 2012 in the Portugal Telecom case was another brick in the wall, and a significant brick at that. In the Polysar ruling, one piece of the puzzle of the VAT status of holding companies, which had not been clear until then, was finally settled: a pure holding company, meaning a company whose sole object is the mere acquisition and holding of shares in other enterprises, is not a taxable person within the meaning of VAT, because it does not carry on an economic activity. In fact, in the terms of the VAT Directives, ‘taxable person’ means any person who independently carries on an economic activity as defined firstly in the Sixth Directive and now in Article 9 of the VAT Directive. On the other hand, Article 4(2) of the Sixth Direc-
葡萄牙电信:控股公司抵扣进项增值税新大门打开
第六指令,就像今天的增值税指令一样,没有明确定义控股公司的增值税地位,这从一开始就可能引发复杂的问题。欧洲法院于1990年在多晶硅案中开始界定这一地位。欧洲法院2012年9月对葡萄牙电信一案的裁决是墙上的另一块砖,而且是一块重要的砖。在多晶硅案的裁决中,控股公司增值税地位的一个难题最终得到了解决:纯控股公司,即唯一目的是单纯收购和持有其他企业股份的公司,不属于增值税意义上的应税人,因为它不进行经济活动。事实上,在增值税指令的条款中,“应纳税的人”是指任何独立进行经济活动的人,这些活动首先在第六条指令中定义,现在在增值税指令第9条中定义。另一方面,第六指令第4(2)条
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信