Book Review—Paul Heyer, The Medium and the Magician: Orson Welles, the Radio Years, 1934–1952

Bradley L. Nason
{"title":"Book Review—Paul Heyer, The Medium and the Magician: Orson Welles, the Radio Years, 1934–1952","authors":"Bradley L. Nason","doi":"10.1207/s15506843jrs1301_13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Just imagine what Orson Welles might have done with today’s technology: a “The Boy Wonder” blog to publicize cuts made in his films by studios fighting his cost overruns; the Internet to link the crossover influences among Welles’s theatrical, film, and radio works; podcasts of his radio dramas; or DVDs of original sound effects, complete with demonstrations of how they were created. The list is endless. As it was, Welles was the original King of All Media. In his superbly researched book, The Medium and the Magician: Orson Welles, the Radio Years, 1934–1952, author Paul Heyer remains true to his mission of completing the unfinished chapter of radio in what is the collective biography of the director, actor, writer, and “stage magician” (p. xiii). Heyer does so by thoroughly describing Welles’s radio contributions but also by showing how influential radio was in Welles’s other work. “It was,” he writes, “a time when the evocative power of radio put the auditory in popular culture more on par with the visual than is the case in our current image-laden era” (p. 129). Part of the Critical Media Studies: Institutions, Politics, and Culture series, the text is broken into three chronological parts comprising nine chapters, an introduction and an epilogue, and what the author calls a “Selected Radiography,” listing “most, but not all of the broadcasts Welles did during his radio years” (p. 217). The first of the three parts, “The Road to CBS,” provides a brief biography and description of Welles’s early theater work, which led to his anonymous—difficult to imagine now—debut on radio following several unsuccessful auditions. Given both a voice that was “so suited for the medium” (p. 17) and his success on stage to that point, Heyer raises the implausible question of who could have beaten out Welles for a part. Success soon followed, including his work for The Columbia Workshop, as the star of The Shadow and with the Mercury Theater on the Air—the platform, of course, for the War of the Worlds broadcast. The book’s second section, and middle three chapters—“Genesis,” “Exodus,” and “Revelation”—are devoted to the October 30, 1938, Panic Broadcast on CBS. This is the most interesting part of Heyer’s study, not only for the technical descriptions of the broadcastbutalso for theanalysisofhowit all came together.Although it seems incredible today, when episodes of so-called reality television programming are filmed and the results embargoed for months, the War of the Worlds broadcast was put together, as most of the productions were then, in a week. In fact, Heyer writes, Welles did not even discuss the idea of “capitalizing on the escalating tensions in Europe by dramatizing an interplanetary conflict” (p. 78) until just 10 days before the actual broadcast. Heyer attributes the success—depending, of course, on one’s perspective—of the broadcast in large part to what he calls the play’s “radio vérité style”: “It effectively","PeriodicalId":331997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radio Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radio Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506843jrs1301_13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Just imagine what Orson Welles might have done with today’s technology: a “The Boy Wonder” blog to publicize cuts made in his films by studios fighting his cost overruns; the Internet to link the crossover influences among Welles’s theatrical, film, and radio works; podcasts of his radio dramas; or DVDs of original sound effects, complete with demonstrations of how they were created. The list is endless. As it was, Welles was the original King of All Media. In his superbly researched book, The Medium and the Magician: Orson Welles, the Radio Years, 1934–1952, author Paul Heyer remains true to his mission of completing the unfinished chapter of radio in what is the collective biography of the director, actor, writer, and “stage magician” (p. xiii). Heyer does so by thoroughly describing Welles’s radio contributions but also by showing how influential radio was in Welles’s other work. “It was,” he writes, “a time when the evocative power of radio put the auditory in popular culture more on par with the visual than is the case in our current image-laden era” (p. 129). Part of the Critical Media Studies: Institutions, Politics, and Culture series, the text is broken into three chronological parts comprising nine chapters, an introduction and an epilogue, and what the author calls a “Selected Radiography,” listing “most, but not all of the broadcasts Welles did during his radio years” (p. 217). The first of the three parts, “The Road to CBS,” provides a brief biography and description of Welles’s early theater work, which led to his anonymous—difficult to imagine now—debut on radio following several unsuccessful auditions. Given both a voice that was “so suited for the medium” (p. 17) and his success on stage to that point, Heyer raises the implausible question of who could have beaten out Welles for a part. Success soon followed, including his work for The Columbia Workshop, as the star of The Shadow and with the Mercury Theater on the Air—the platform, of course, for the War of the Worlds broadcast. The book’s second section, and middle three chapters—“Genesis,” “Exodus,” and “Revelation”—are devoted to the October 30, 1938, Panic Broadcast on CBS. This is the most interesting part of Heyer’s study, not only for the technical descriptions of the broadcastbutalso for theanalysisofhowit all came together.Although it seems incredible today, when episodes of so-called reality television programming are filmed and the results embargoed for months, the War of the Worlds broadcast was put together, as most of the productions were then, in a week. In fact, Heyer writes, Welles did not even discuss the idea of “capitalizing on the escalating tensions in Europe by dramatizing an interplanetary conflict” (p. 78) until just 10 days before the actual broadcast. Heyer attributes the success—depending, of course, on one’s perspective—of the broadcast in large part to what he calls the play’s “radio vérité style”: “It effectively
书评——保罗·海耶,《媒介与魔术师:广播时代的奥森·威尔斯,1934-1952》
想象一下奥逊·威尔斯(Orson Welles)用今天的技术会做些什么:一个名为“奇迹男孩”(The Boy Wonder)的博客,公布制片厂为抵制他的成本超支而在他的电影中删减的部分;利用互联网将威尔斯的戏剧、电影和广播作品之间的交叉影响联系起来;他的广播剧播客;或者原始音效的dvd,并演示它们是如何制作的。这样的例子不胜枚举。事实上,威尔斯是最早的全媒体之王。作者保罗·海耶(Paul Heyer)在其研究精深的著作《媒介与魔术师:奥逊·威尔斯,无线电年代,1934-1952》(The Medium and The Magician, The Radio Years, 1934-1952)中忠于自己的使命,完成了关于无线电的未完成章节,这是一部集导演、演员、作家和“舞台魔术师”于一体的传记(第13页)。海耶通过全面描述威尔斯对无线电的贡献,同时也展示了无线电在威尔斯其他作品中的影响力。“那是,”他写道,“一个收音机唤起的力量使听觉在流行文化中与视觉更平等的时代,而不是在我们这个充斥着图像的时代”(第129页)。作为《批判媒体研究:制度、政治和文化》系列的一部分,本书按时间顺序分为三个部分,包括九章、引言和尾声,以及作者所称的“精选放射摄影”,列出了“威尔斯在他的广播生涯中所做的大部分广播,但不是全部”(第217页)。三部分的第一部分《通往CBS的路》(The Road to CBS)简要介绍了威尔斯早期的戏剧作品,在几次试镜失败后,他以匿名身份(现在很难想象)首次在电台亮相。考虑到他的声音“非常适合这个媒介”(第17页),以及他在舞台上的成功,海耶提出了一个令人难以置信的问题:谁能击败威尔斯获得一个角色?他很快就获得了成功,包括他为哥伦比亚工作室工作,作为《影子》的明星,并在空中的水星剧院工作——当然,这是世界大战广播的平台。这本书的第二部分和中间的三章——“创世纪”、“出埃及记”和“启示录”——专门讲述了1938年10月30日CBS的恐慌广播。这是海耶研究中最有趣的部分,不仅是对广播的技术描述,而且是对所有这些是如何组合在一起的分析。虽然在今天看来不可思议,当所谓的电视真人秀节目被拍摄下来,结果被禁止几个月的时候,《世界大战》的播出是在一周内完成的,就像当时的大多数制作一样。事实上,海耶写道,威尔斯甚至没有讨论过“通过戏剧化星际冲突来利用欧洲不断升级的紧张局势”的想法(第78页),直到实际广播前10天。海耶将这部剧的成功——当然,这取决于个人的观点——在很大程度上归功于他所说的“广播录影带风格”:“它很有效
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信