Fair Corporate Taxation: Why and How International Tax Rules Need to Be Changed

Séverine Picard
{"title":"Fair Corporate Taxation: Why and How International Tax Rules Need to Be Changed","authors":"Séverine Picard","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3729352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tax avoidance harms public budgets as is estimated that at least 20 per cent of corporate income tax revenues are lost due to such corporate behaviour. Furthermore, the business models used by multinational enterprises to reduce tax payments (such as letterbox-type practices) have a detrimental impact on productive investment, on workers’ involvement in management’s decisions and on collective bargaining for a fair share of the wealth. Indeed, current international tax rules do not take into account the complex business and tax strategies in which multinationals are engaged at global level. First, a move towards a unitary taxation principle is required, which means that the profits of a multinational should be determined globally and shared out between countries in proportion to the real level of economic activity. Second, a global minimum tax rate should limit tax competition between countries and raise corporate tax revenues. And finally, greater transparency about tax practices, including a breakdown of revenues and profits by country (country-by-country reporting), is needed to enable workers’ representatives to understand the tax practices of their companies.","PeriodicalId":385233,"journal":{"name":"FEN: Differences in Taxation & Corporate Finance (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEN: Differences in Taxation & Corporate Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3729352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Tax avoidance harms public budgets as is estimated that at least 20 per cent of corporate income tax revenues are lost due to such corporate behaviour. Furthermore, the business models used by multinational enterprises to reduce tax payments (such as letterbox-type practices) have a detrimental impact on productive investment, on workers’ involvement in management’s decisions and on collective bargaining for a fair share of the wealth. Indeed, current international tax rules do not take into account the complex business and tax strategies in which multinationals are engaged at global level. First, a move towards a unitary taxation principle is required, which means that the profits of a multinational should be determined globally and shared out between countries in proportion to the real level of economic activity. Second, a global minimum tax rate should limit tax competition between countries and raise corporate tax revenues. And finally, greater transparency about tax practices, including a breakdown of revenues and profits by country (country-by-country reporting), is needed to enable workers’ representatives to understand the tax practices of their companies.
公平公司税:为什么以及如何改变国际税收规则
避税损害公共预算,据估计,至少20%的企业所得税收入因此类企业行为而损失。此外,跨国企业用于减少纳税的商业模式(如信箱式做法)对生产性投资、工人参与管理决策和为公平分享财富而进行的集体谈判产生了有害影响。事实上,目前的国际税收规则并没有考虑到跨国公司在全球范围内参与的复杂的商业和税收战略。首先,需要向单一税收原则迈进,这意味着跨国公司的利润应在全球范围内确定,并在各国之间按实际经济活动水平的比例分配。其次,全球最低税率应该限制国家之间的税收竞争,提高企业税收收入。最后,需要提高税收实践的透明度,包括按国家分列收入和利润(按国家报告),以使工人代表能够了解其公司的税收实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信