ResEval: a web-based evaluation system for internal medicine house staff

H. Feldman, M. Triola
{"title":"ResEval: a web-based evaluation system for internal medicine house staff","authors":"H. Feldman, M. Triola","doi":"10.1145/1013367.1013463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation and assessment of physicians-in-training (house staff) is a complex task. Residency training programs are under increasing pressure [1] to provide accurate and comprehensive evaluations of performance of resident physicians [2,3]. For many years, the Internal Medicine training program at NYU School of Medicine used a single standardized paper form for all evaluation scenarios. This strategy was inadequate as physicians train in multiple diverse settings evaluation of physicians in the intensive care unit is quite different from those in the general clinics. The paper system resulted in poor compliance by house staff and faculty in the completion of evaluations. In addition, the data being collected from the paper forms was of poor quality due to the non-specific nature of the questions. A committee was formed in 2001, which created a new strategy for evaluating the core competencies of house staff. Given the ubiquity of web accessible computers in the clinical and non-clinical areas of hospitals and the flexibility a computerized system would provide, a web-based evaluation system was designed and implemented. This system allows for on-the-spot evaluations tailored to the evaluator, evaluatee and the venue of the evaluation. During the 2002 residency year, data was collected on satisfaction and use of the system and compared with the previous paper evaluation.","PeriodicalId":409891,"journal":{"name":"WWW Alt. '04","volume":"2017 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WWW Alt. '04","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1013367.1013463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The evaluation and assessment of physicians-in-training (house staff) is a complex task. Residency training programs are under increasing pressure [1] to provide accurate and comprehensive evaluations of performance of resident physicians [2,3]. For many years, the Internal Medicine training program at NYU School of Medicine used a single standardized paper form for all evaluation scenarios. This strategy was inadequate as physicians train in multiple diverse settings evaluation of physicians in the intensive care unit is quite different from those in the general clinics. The paper system resulted in poor compliance by house staff and faculty in the completion of evaluations. In addition, the data being collected from the paper forms was of poor quality due to the non-specific nature of the questions. A committee was formed in 2001, which created a new strategy for evaluating the core competencies of house staff. Given the ubiquity of web accessible computers in the clinical and non-clinical areas of hospitals and the flexibility a computerized system would provide, a web-based evaluation system was designed and implemented. This system allows for on-the-spot evaluations tailored to the evaluator, evaluatee and the venue of the evaluation. During the 2002 residency year, data was collected on satisfaction and use of the system and compared with the previous paper evaluation.
ResEval:一个基于网络的内科工作人员评估系统
对实习医师(住院医师)的评价和考核是一项复杂的任务。住院医师培训项目面临越来越大的压力[1],需要对住院医师的表现进行准确、全面的评估[2,3]。多年来,纽约大学医学院(NYU School of Medicine)的内科培训项目在所有评估方案中使用单一的标准化纸质表格。这种策略是不够的,因为医生在多种不同的环境中接受培训,重症监护病房的医生评估与普通诊所的医生评估有很大不同。纸质系统导致学院工作人员和教师在完成评估时不遵守规定。此外,由于问题的非特异性,从纸质表格中收集的数据质量较差。2001年成立了一个委员会,制定了评估院务人员核心能力的新策略。鉴于在医院的临床和非临床领域普遍存在可通过网络访问的计算机,以及计算机化系统将提供的灵活性,设计并实施了一个基于网络的评估系统。该系统允许根据评估者、被评估者和评估地点进行现场评估。在2002年住院医师年度,收集了系统满意度和使用情况的数据,并与之前的论文评估进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信