HOW MEANINGFUL WORK AND SOURCES OF MEANING CHANGED DURING THE PANDEMIC: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY

F. Tommasi, Andrea Ceschi, R. Sartori, Giorgia Giusto, Sofia Morandini, Beniamino Caputo, Marija Gostimir
{"title":"HOW MEANINGFUL WORK AND SOURCES OF MEANING CHANGED DURING THE PANDEMIC: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY","authors":"F. Tommasi, Andrea Ceschi, R. Sartori, Giorgia Giusto, Sofia Morandini, Beniamino Caputo, Marija Gostimir","doi":"10.36315/2022v2end095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"The COVID-19 pandemic has affected many aspects of our life leading to a completely new world, increasingly complex and uncertain. This is also evident in the workplace, especially on how employees experience and perceive their work. Indeed, it is not surprising that current critical reflections in the study of work and organizations give attention on the challenges on individuals’ wish for meaningful experiences at work. The current debate focuses on how employees can get lost in terms of their sense of work in the face of job demands, responsibilities and working hours. From here, it is central that in the face of new working methods and conditions, organizations behave to guarantee the quality of work and the degree to which work can be a source of meaning. This study has exploratory purposes and intends to investigate the relationship between the dimensions of quality of work and the dimension of meaningful work in the context of the post-pandemic. The data were obtained with a pre-test–post-test design, i.e., before and after restrictions due to the pandemic, through a survey administered online to about 145 workers. We investigated (a) the level of quality at work considering the dimensions of training, safety and communication at work, and (b) the Meaning in Work construct and the related sources of coherence, significance, purpose and belonging. We analysed data via the Structural Equation Modelling to explore the predictive role of job quality for meaning in work dimensions. The results indicate that the latent variable of job quality, described by the observed dimensions of organizational safety and training resources, at time 1 affect meaning in work dimensions respectively at time 1 and time 2. The results of the present study are relevant both for directing further studies on the topic of meaningful work and for organisations wishing to foster meaningful work and link sources. In the context of top-down work redesign process, our results offer initial implications about the role of job quality for sustaining employees’ wish for meaning in their work. The present study represents one of the limited studies on the sources of meaningful work and posit initial insights on how to foster meaningful work. Moreover, this happens in the context of the post-pandemic, supporting initial comprehension about whether organizations can support individuals’ quest for meaning in this uncertain time.\"","PeriodicalId":404891,"journal":{"name":"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022v2end095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"The COVID-19 pandemic has affected many aspects of our life leading to a completely new world, increasingly complex and uncertain. This is also evident in the workplace, especially on how employees experience and perceive their work. Indeed, it is not surprising that current critical reflections in the study of work and organizations give attention on the challenges on individuals’ wish for meaningful experiences at work. The current debate focuses on how employees can get lost in terms of their sense of work in the face of job demands, responsibilities and working hours. From here, it is central that in the face of new working methods and conditions, organizations behave to guarantee the quality of work and the degree to which work can be a source of meaning. This study has exploratory purposes and intends to investigate the relationship between the dimensions of quality of work and the dimension of meaningful work in the context of the post-pandemic. The data were obtained with a pre-test–post-test design, i.e., before and after restrictions due to the pandemic, through a survey administered online to about 145 workers. We investigated (a) the level of quality at work considering the dimensions of training, safety and communication at work, and (b) the Meaning in Work construct and the related sources of coherence, significance, purpose and belonging. We analysed data via the Structural Equation Modelling to explore the predictive role of job quality for meaning in work dimensions. The results indicate that the latent variable of job quality, described by the observed dimensions of organizational safety and training resources, at time 1 affect meaning in work dimensions respectively at time 1 and time 2. The results of the present study are relevant both for directing further studies on the topic of meaningful work and for organisations wishing to foster meaningful work and link sources. In the context of top-down work redesign process, our results offer initial implications about the role of job quality for sustaining employees’ wish for meaning in their work. The present study represents one of the limited studies on the sources of meaningful work and posit initial insights on how to foster meaningful work. Moreover, this happens in the context of the post-pandemic, supporting initial comprehension about whether organizations can support individuals’ quest for meaning in this uncertain time."
大流行期间有意义的工作和意义来源发生了怎样的变化:一项探索性研究
“2019冠状病毒病大流行影响了我们生活的许多方面,导致一个全新的世界,越来越复杂和不确定。这在工作场所也很明显,尤其是在员工如何体验和看待他们的工作上。事实上,在工作和组织研究中,当前的批判性反思关注个人在工作中获得有意义体验的愿望所面临的挑战,这并不奇怪。目前的争论集中在员工在面对工作要求、责任和工作时间时是如何迷失工作感的。从这里开始,面对新的工作方法和条件,组织的行为是保证工作质量和工作可以成为意义来源的程度,这是核心。本研究具有探索性目的,旨在调查大流行后背景下工作质量维度与有意义工作维度之间的关系。这些数据是通过对约145名工人进行的在线调查,采用前测试-后测试设计获得的,即在大流行限制之前和之后。我们调查了(a)考虑到工作中的培训、安全和沟通维度的工作质量水平,以及(b)工作意义结构和相关的连贯性、重要性、目的和归属感来源。我们通过结构方程模型分析数据,探索工作质量对工作维度意义的预测作用。结果表明,时间1的工作质量潜变量(由观察到的组织安全和培训资源维度描述)分别影响时间1和时间2的工作维度意义。本研究的结果对于指导关于有意义的工作主题的进一步研究以及希望促进有意义的工作和链接资源的组织都是相关的。在自上而下的工作重新设计过程的背景下,我们的研究结果对工作质量在维持员工对工作意义的愿望方面的作用提供了初步的启示。本研究代表了对有意义工作来源的有限研究之一,并对如何培养有意义工作提出了初步见解。此外,这发生在大流行后的背景下,有助于初步理解组织是否能够在这个不确定的时期支持个人对意义的追求。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信