Railway regulation: a comparative analysis of a diverging reality

Juan J. Montero, M. Finger
{"title":"Railway regulation: a comparative analysis of a diverging reality","authors":"Juan J. Montero, M. Finger","doi":"10.4337/9781789901788.00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Railway regulation is being evaluated all around the world. Over the past 40 years, regulatory reform has transformed railway systems in the most developed nations. Despite divergences in railway systems and the resulting divergences in regulatory reform, many countries are now evaluating the results and thinking about ways forward. The nations that lead in railway reforms, such as the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan, are now evaluating the results. The European Union, in turn, is completing the liberalization of the rail sector. Other countries are considering whether to implement similar reforms, at the same time as experimenting with their own transformations, with interesting lessons for everyone. The aim of this book is to provide readers with a comprehensive perspective on the debates about railway regulation across the world. Leading academics and practitioners from the main railway countries present the results of 40 years of railway regulatory reform. The chapters describe the current challenges in railway regulation, as well as suggestions for how to address them. Specific chapters are devoted to the most relevant challenges in railway regulation – namely, high-speed services, financing, tendering, technical specifications, digitalization, consumer protection, and the application of competition law. The scope of this introductory chapter is to provide an analytical perspective on the evolution and the challenges in matters of railway regulation in the world’s main railway countries. To this end, we naturally rely heavily on the different contributions to this book. In the book we will identify common themes, but more importantly, explain the divergences in railway regulation. We posit that these divergences emerged mainly after competition from road and later from aviation took place. Subsequently, many countries undertook railway reforms, the nature of which can typically be explained by the policy choices made by the different countries. In other words, and especially in railways, one size does not fit all. The remainder of this introductory chapter is structured as follows: in the next section we will describe the evolution of railways from its origins in the UK to “peak rail” in the early 20th century. In most countries, railways were initially built and operated by private companies: governments sometimes financially supported their construction, but most often granted concession to private companies who were in the lead. As railways became increasingly important for national development, whether in terms of transporting raw materials (such as coal), manufactured goods, or people, the national rail network grew denser and railways became subject to government regulation due to market abuse, high rates, and discriminatory rebates. In some countries, railways were even nationalized. The main differences between countries during this period concern the degree to which the network was developed. Section 1.3 describes how railway systems declined due to competition, first from road and then from aviation. Around the 1940s and 1950s, railway companies across the world were","PeriodicalId":359573,"journal":{"name":"Handbook on Railway Regulation","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook on Railway Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901788.00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Railway regulation is being evaluated all around the world. Over the past 40 years, regulatory reform has transformed railway systems in the most developed nations. Despite divergences in railway systems and the resulting divergences in regulatory reform, many countries are now evaluating the results and thinking about ways forward. The nations that lead in railway reforms, such as the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan, are now evaluating the results. The European Union, in turn, is completing the liberalization of the rail sector. Other countries are considering whether to implement similar reforms, at the same time as experimenting with their own transformations, with interesting lessons for everyone. The aim of this book is to provide readers with a comprehensive perspective on the debates about railway regulation across the world. Leading academics and practitioners from the main railway countries present the results of 40 years of railway regulatory reform. The chapters describe the current challenges in railway regulation, as well as suggestions for how to address them. Specific chapters are devoted to the most relevant challenges in railway regulation – namely, high-speed services, financing, tendering, technical specifications, digitalization, consumer protection, and the application of competition law. The scope of this introductory chapter is to provide an analytical perspective on the evolution and the challenges in matters of railway regulation in the world’s main railway countries. To this end, we naturally rely heavily on the different contributions to this book. In the book we will identify common themes, but more importantly, explain the divergences in railway regulation. We posit that these divergences emerged mainly after competition from road and later from aviation took place. Subsequently, many countries undertook railway reforms, the nature of which can typically be explained by the policy choices made by the different countries. In other words, and especially in railways, one size does not fit all. The remainder of this introductory chapter is structured as follows: in the next section we will describe the evolution of railways from its origins in the UK to “peak rail” in the early 20th century. In most countries, railways were initially built and operated by private companies: governments sometimes financially supported their construction, but most often granted concession to private companies who were in the lead. As railways became increasingly important for national development, whether in terms of transporting raw materials (such as coal), manufactured goods, or people, the national rail network grew denser and railways became subject to government regulation due to market abuse, high rates, and discriminatory rebates. In some countries, railways were even nationalized. The main differences between countries during this period concern the degree to which the network was developed. Section 1.3 describes how railway systems declined due to competition, first from road and then from aviation. Around the 1940s and 1950s, railway companies across the world were
铁路管制:一个分歧现实的比较分析
世界各地都在评估铁路监管。在过去的40年里,监管改革改变了大多数发达国家的铁路系统。尽管铁路系统存在分歧,监管改革也因此存在分歧,但许多国家目前正在评估结果并思考前进的道路。在铁路改革方面处于领先地位的国家,如美国、英国和日本,目前正在对改革成果进行评估。反过来,欧洲联盟正在完成铁路部门的自由化。其他国家正在考虑是否实施类似的改革,与此同时,他们也在尝试自己的改革,为每个人提供有趣的经验。本书的目的是为读者提供一个全面的视角,了解世界各地关于铁路监管的辩论。来自主要铁路国家的主要学者和实践者展示了40年来铁路监管改革的成果。这些章节描述了当前铁路监管面临的挑战,以及如何解决这些挑战的建议。具体章节专门讨论铁路监管中最相关的挑战,即高速服务、融资、招标、技术规范、数字化、消费者保护和竞争法的应用。本导论章的范围是对世界主要铁路国家的铁路监管问题的演变和挑战提供一个分析的视角。为此,我们很自然地依赖于对本书的不同贡献。在这本书中,我们将找出共同的主题,但更重要的是,解释铁路监管的分歧。我们认为,这些分歧主要是在公路和后来的航空竞争发生后出现的。随后,许多国家进行了铁路改革,其性质通常可以通过不同国家所作的政策选择来解释。换句话说,特别是在铁路领域,一种模式不可能适用于所有人。本导论章的其余部分结构如下:在下一节中,我们将描述铁路从英国起源到20世纪初的“高峰铁路”的演变。在大多数国家,铁路最初是由私营公司建造和运营的:政府有时会在财政上支持铁路建设,但大多数情况下,政府会把特许经营权授予领先的私营公司。随着铁路在国家发展中变得越来越重要,无论是在运输原材料(如煤炭)、制成品还是人员方面,国家铁路网变得更加密集,由于滥用市场、高费率和歧视性回扣,铁路成为政府监管的对象。在一些国家,铁路甚至被国有化。这一时期各国之间的主要差别在于网络的发展程度。第1.3节描述了铁路系统是如何由于竞争而衰落的,首先是来自公路,然后是来自航空。大约在20世纪40年代和50年代,世界各地的铁路公司都是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信