I'm tired of listening: The effects of supervisor appraisals of group voice on supervisor emotional exhaustion and performance.

Hudson Sessions, J. Nahrgang, Daniel W. Newton, Melissa Chamberlin
{"title":"I'm tired of listening: The effects of supervisor appraisals of group voice on supervisor emotional exhaustion and performance.","authors":"Hudson Sessions, J. Nahrgang, Daniel W. Newton, Melissa Chamberlin","doi":"10.1037/apl0000455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Employee voice, or speaking up with constructive expressions in the workplace, is beneficial to organizations as it is often a catalyst for positive change. Despite its benefits, voice may have mixed implications for supervisors who are frequently the targets of group members' ideas or concerns. We draw on the transactional theory of stress to examine the positive and negative effects of group promotive and prohibitive voice on supervisor emotional exhaustion and performance. Specifically, we theorize and find that supervisors appraise group promotive voice as fostering their well-being and personal growth (i.e., challenge appraisal) and, conversely, appraise group prohibitive voice as inhibiting their well-being and personal growth (i.e., hindrance appraisal). These appraisals, in turn, influence supervisors' emotional exhaustion and performance. Furthermore, we investigate a supervisor's personal sense of power as a boundary condition that influences the effects of group voice on supervisor appraisals of group voice and subsequent emotional exhaustion and performance. We test our model using a multiwave field sample design (Study 1) and an in-person experimental design (Study 2). Across these 2 studies, we find negative indirect effects of group promotive voice on supervisor emotional exhaustion through challenge appraisals of group voice and positive indirect effects of group prohibitive voice on supervisor emotional exhaustion through hindrance appraisals of group voice as well as conditional indirect effects of supervisors' personal sense of power. Our model offers novel insights into supervisors' appraisals of group voice and the implications for their emotional exhaustion and performance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":169654,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of applied psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of applied psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Employee voice, or speaking up with constructive expressions in the workplace, is beneficial to organizations as it is often a catalyst for positive change. Despite its benefits, voice may have mixed implications for supervisors who are frequently the targets of group members' ideas or concerns. We draw on the transactional theory of stress to examine the positive and negative effects of group promotive and prohibitive voice on supervisor emotional exhaustion and performance. Specifically, we theorize and find that supervisors appraise group promotive voice as fostering their well-being and personal growth (i.e., challenge appraisal) and, conversely, appraise group prohibitive voice as inhibiting their well-being and personal growth (i.e., hindrance appraisal). These appraisals, in turn, influence supervisors' emotional exhaustion and performance. Furthermore, we investigate a supervisor's personal sense of power as a boundary condition that influences the effects of group voice on supervisor appraisals of group voice and subsequent emotional exhaustion and performance. We test our model using a multiwave field sample design (Study 1) and an in-person experimental design (Study 2). Across these 2 studies, we find negative indirect effects of group promotive voice on supervisor emotional exhaustion through challenge appraisals of group voice and positive indirect effects of group prohibitive voice on supervisor emotional exhaustion through hindrance appraisals of group voice as well as conditional indirect effects of supervisors' personal sense of power. Our model offers novel insights into supervisors' appraisals of group voice and the implications for their emotional exhaustion and performance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
我听厌了:管理者对群体声音的评价对管理者情绪耗竭和绩效的影响。
员工的声音,或者在工作场所用建设性的表达方式说话,对组织是有益的,因为它通常是积极变化的催化剂。尽管声音有好处,但对于经常成为团队成员想法或关注点的目标的主管来说,声音可能有复杂的含义。我们利用压力的交易理论来研究群体促进和禁止的声音对管理者情绪耗竭和绩效的积极和消极影响。具体来说,我们理论化并发现主管将群体促进性声音评价为促进他们的幸福感和个人成长(即挑战评估),相反,将群体禁止性声音评价为抑制他们的幸福感和个人成长(即障碍评估)。这些评价反过来又影响管理者的情绪消耗和绩效。此外,我们还研究了管理者的个人权力感作为一个边界条件,它会影响管理者对群体声音的评价以及随后的情绪耗竭和绩效。我们使用多波场样本设计(研究1)和现场实验设计(研究2)对我们的模型进行了测试。在这两项研究中,我们发现群体促进性声音通过群体声音的挑战评价对主管情绪衰竭产生消极的间接影响,群体禁止性声音通过群体声音的障碍评价对主管情绪衰竭产生积极的间接影响,以及主管个人权力感的条件间接影响。我们的模型为管理者对群体声音的评价以及他们的情绪耗竭和表现的影响提供了新的见解。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2019 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信