Chapter 3: What Do Judges Want? How to Model Judicial Preferences

C. Cameron, L. Kornhauser
{"title":"Chapter 3: What Do Judges Want? How to Model Judicial Preferences","authors":"C. Cameron, L. Kornhauser","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2979419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We discuss a central question in the study of courts: What do judges want? We suggest three different domains that might serve as the basic preferences of a judge: case dispositions and rules, caseloads and case mixes, and social consequences. We emphasize preferences over dispositions on the grounds of plausibility and tractability. We then identify desireable properties of dispositional utility functions and the relationship between dispositional utility and expected utility for rules. We examine the impact on expected rule utility from case distributions that are sensitive to the enforced rule. We illustrate how to combine dipositional utility with efforts costs and time constraints. We provide examples of case spaces, dispositional utility functions, and expected utility functions for enforced rules. \nThis essay is a draft chapter of a book-in-progress on the positive political theory of courts.","PeriodicalId":229524,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Public Law - Courts eJournal","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Public Law - Courts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2979419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We discuss a central question in the study of courts: What do judges want? We suggest three different domains that might serve as the basic preferences of a judge: case dispositions and rules, caseloads and case mixes, and social consequences. We emphasize preferences over dispositions on the grounds of plausibility and tractability. We then identify desireable properties of dispositional utility functions and the relationship between dispositional utility and expected utility for rules. We examine the impact on expected rule utility from case distributions that are sensitive to the enforced rule. We illustrate how to combine dipositional utility with efforts costs and time constraints. We provide examples of case spaces, dispositional utility functions, and expected utility functions for enforced rules. This essay is a draft chapter of a book-in-progress on the positive political theory of courts.
第三章:法官想要什么?如何模拟司法偏好
我们讨论了法院研究中的一个核心问题:法官想要什么?我们建议三个不同的领域可以作为法官的基本偏好:案件处理和规则,案件数量和案件组合,以及社会后果。基于合理性和可追溯性,我们强调偏好而不是倾向。然后,我们确定了配置效用函数的理想属性以及配置效用与规则期望效用之间的关系。我们研究了对强制规则敏感的案例分布对预期规则效用的影响。我们将说明如何将配置效用与努力成本和时间约束结合起来。我们提供了案例空间、配置效用函数和强制规则的预期效用函数的示例。这篇文章是一本正在出版的关于法院积极政治理论的书的草稿章节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信