Analysis of sfqCoDel for Active Queue Management

V. Rao, M. Tahiliani, Udaya Kumar K. Shenoy
{"title":"Analysis of sfqCoDel for Active Queue Management","authors":"V. Rao, M. Tahiliani, Udaya Kumar K. Shenoy","doi":"10.1109/ICADIWT.2014.6814669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The availability of cheaper and high capacity Random Access Memory (RAM) has resulted in the growth of buffer size in all the computing devices. This aberrant increase of buffer capacity in network devices has resulted into high latency, leading to reduced throughput; thus decreasing the tendency of absorbing spontaneous burst of traffic. The requirement for Active Queue Management (AQM) has been evident for decades. These solutions require various parameter configuration and are dependent on a particular network condition to work efficiently. Hence an algorithm which is simple, efficient, does not require setting of parameters and works seamlessly irrespective of the network condition is required. Even though Controlled Delay (CoDel) is parameterless and adapts to dynamically changing link rates with no negative impact on utilization, it deviates from its primary purpose of reducing congestion when there is an increase in RTT and when congestion level varies abruptly. As a consequence, a variant of CoDel called Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel (sfqCoDel) is simulated and compared. The Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel proactively drops packets which occupy reasonably larger bandwidth as compared to CoDel, which proactively drops packet irrespective of the bandwidth consumption by packets. This paper aims to perform a comprehensive analysis of Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel for Active Queue Management. A comparison is also carried out between sfqCoDel with CoDel. The sfqCoDel appears to be much better than CoDel in certain areas where CoDel fails to perform well.","PeriodicalId":339627,"journal":{"name":"The Fifth International Conference on the Applications of Digital Information and Web Technologies (ICADIWT 2014)","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Fifth International Conference on the Applications of Digital Information and Web Technologies (ICADIWT 2014)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICADIWT.2014.6814669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The availability of cheaper and high capacity Random Access Memory (RAM) has resulted in the growth of buffer size in all the computing devices. This aberrant increase of buffer capacity in network devices has resulted into high latency, leading to reduced throughput; thus decreasing the tendency of absorbing spontaneous burst of traffic. The requirement for Active Queue Management (AQM) has been evident for decades. These solutions require various parameter configuration and are dependent on a particular network condition to work efficiently. Hence an algorithm which is simple, efficient, does not require setting of parameters and works seamlessly irrespective of the network condition is required. Even though Controlled Delay (CoDel) is parameterless and adapts to dynamically changing link rates with no negative impact on utilization, it deviates from its primary purpose of reducing congestion when there is an increase in RTT and when congestion level varies abruptly. As a consequence, a variant of CoDel called Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel (sfqCoDel) is simulated and compared. The Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel proactively drops packets which occupy reasonably larger bandwidth as compared to CoDel, which proactively drops packet irrespective of the bandwidth consumption by packets. This paper aims to perform a comprehensive analysis of Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel for Active Queue Management. A comparison is also carried out between sfqCoDel with CoDel. The sfqCoDel appears to be much better than CoDel in certain areas where CoDel fails to perform well.
主动队列管理sfqCoDel分析
廉价和高容量随机存取存储器(RAM)的可用性导致了所有计算设备中缓冲区大小的增长。网络设备中缓冲区容量的异常增加导致了高延迟,从而降低了吞吐量;从而减少了吸收自发突发交通的倾向。对活动队列管理(AQM)的需求几十年来一直很明显。这些解决方案需要各种参数配置,并且依赖于特定的网络条件才能有效地工作。因此,该算法简单,高效,不需要设置参数,无论网络条件如何都能无缝工作。尽管可控延迟(CoDel)是无参数的,能够适应动态变化的链路速率,对利用率没有负面影响,但当RTT增加和拥塞水平突然变化时,它偏离了减少拥塞的主要目的。因此,模拟和比较了CoDel的一种变体,称为随机公平队列CoDel (sfqCoDel)。与CoDel相比,随机公平队列CoDel主动丢弃占用较大带宽的数据包,而CoDel不考虑数据包的带宽消耗而主动丢弃数据包。本文旨在对主动队列管理中的随机公平队列编码进行全面分析。并对sfqCoDel和CoDel进行了比较。sfqCoDel在某些CoDel表现不佳的领域似乎比CoDel要好得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信