Analysis of Barriers and Drivers for BIM Adoption

Mansur Hamma-adama, T. Kouider, H. Salman
{"title":"Analysis of Barriers and Drivers for BIM Adoption","authors":"Mansur Hamma-adama, T. Kouider, H. Salman","doi":"10.54216/ijbes.030102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on 'digitalization and collaboration' in the construction industry has been gaining momentum in the recent academic engagements. Despite its existence in many industries (i.e. financial services, retailing, publishing and travelling) for over ten years, it is yet to catch up by the construction market; this is due to several challenges whose existence are more dynamic and contextual than generic to various countries. The problems are defined in many studies across borders, but their impacts varied with countries. This case is equally the same to drivers toward the adoption of BIM. This study analyses barriers and drivers to BIM adoption in the Nigerian construction industry from adopters and non-adopters perspectives as to allow an informed decision in developing a strategy for macro BIM adoption. Primary data fetched from professional stakeholders through an online questionnaire survey were analysed using SPSS software and Microsoft Excel. This investigation reveals the most significant barriers against BIM adoption as Lack of expertise, Lack of standardization and protocols to mention but a few. And, most influential drivers from both adopters and non-adopters as Availability of trained professionals to handle the tools, Proof of cost savings by its adoption, BIM Software affordability, and awareness of the technology among the industry stakeholders. The adopters and non-adopters groups have nearly equal Percentage Disagreement (PD) and Percentage Agreement (PA) for both the barriers and drivers to BIM adoption. Thus, this suggests that the adopters are still at the early stage of BIM adoption, so have nearly the same perceptions with the non-adopters. The study recommends proper consideration of the established barriers and drivers while developing any strategy for effective BIM adoption. Further face-to-face (interview) study is necessary to explore more and in-depth challenges to adoption of BIM in the industry; and as the industry is getting more aware of the BIM, periodic evaluation of the critical barriers and drivers is vital.","PeriodicalId":334453,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of BIM and Engineering Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54216/ijbes.030102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Research on 'digitalization and collaboration' in the construction industry has been gaining momentum in the recent academic engagements. Despite its existence in many industries (i.e. financial services, retailing, publishing and travelling) for over ten years, it is yet to catch up by the construction market; this is due to several challenges whose existence are more dynamic and contextual than generic to various countries. The problems are defined in many studies across borders, but their impacts varied with countries. This case is equally the same to drivers toward the adoption of BIM. This study analyses barriers and drivers to BIM adoption in the Nigerian construction industry from adopters and non-adopters perspectives as to allow an informed decision in developing a strategy for macro BIM adoption. Primary data fetched from professional stakeholders through an online questionnaire survey were analysed using SPSS software and Microsoft Excel. This investigation reveals the most significant barriers against BIM adoption as Lack of expertise, Lack of standardization and protocols to mention but a few. And, most influential drivers from both adopters and non-adopters as Availability of trained professionals to handle the tools, Proof of cost savings by its adoption, BIM Software affordability, and awareness of the technology among the industry stakeholders. The adopters and non-adopters groups have nearly equal Percentage Disagreement (PD) and Percentage Agreement (PA) for both the barriers and drivers to BIM adoption. Thus, this suggests that the adopters are still at the early stage of BIM adoption, so have nearly the same perceptions with the non-adopters. The study recommends proper consideration of the established barriers and drivers while developing any strategy for effective BIM adoption. Further face-to-face (interview) study is necessary to explore more and in-depth challenges to adoption of BIM in the industry; and as the industry is getting more aware of the BIM, periodic evaluation of the critical barriers and drivers is vital.
BIM采用的障碍和驱动因素分析
在最近的学术活动中,对建筑行业“数字化与协作”的研究势头日益强劲。尽管它在许多行业(如金融服务、零售、出版和旅游)已经存在了十多年,但它还没有赶上建筑市场;这是由于一些挑战的存在更具活力和背景,而不是各国的普遍性。这些问题在许多跨国研究中得到了界定,但它们的影响因国家而异。这种情况同样适用于推动BIM采用的因素。本研究从采用者和非采用者的角度分析了尼日利亚建筑行业采用BIM的障碍和驱动因素,以便在制定宏观BIM采用策略时做出明智的决策。通过在线问卷调查从专业利益相关者中获取的原始数据,使用SPSS软件和Microsoft Excel进行分析。这项调查揭示了BIM采用的最大障碍是缺乏专业知识,缺乏标准化和协议等等。并且,来自采用者和非采用者的最具影响力的驱动因素是训练有素的专业人员来处理工具的可用性,通过采用来节省成本的证明,BIM软件的可负担性以及行业利益相关者对该技术的认识。对于BIM采用的障碍和驱动因素,采用者和非采用者群体的分歧百分比(PD)和同意百分比(PA)几乎相等。因此,这表明采用者仍处于采用BIM的早期阶段,因此与非采用者有着几乎相同的看法。该研究建议在制定有效采用BIM的策略时,适当考虑现有的障碍和驱动因素。需要进一步的面对面(访谈)研究,以探索更多深入的行业采用BIM面临的挑战;随着行业对BIM越来越了解,定期评估关键障碍和驱动因素至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信