Hardware-efficient and highly-reconfigurable 4- and 2-track fault-tolerant designs for mesh-connected multicomputers

N. Mahapatra, S. Dutt
{"title":"Hardware-efficient and highly-reconfigurable 4- and 2-track fault-tolerant designs for mesh-connected multicomputers","authors":"N. Mahapatra, S. Dutt","doi":"10.1109/FTCS.1996.535880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider m-track models for constructing fault-tolerant (FT) mesh systems which have one primary and m spare tracks per row and column, switches at the intersection of these tracks, and spare processors at the boundaries. A faulty system is reconfigured by finding for each fault u a reconfiguration path from the fault to a spare in which starting from the fault u, a processor is replaced or \"covered\" by the nearest \"available\" succeeding processor on the path-a processor on the path is not available if it is faulty or is used as a \"cover\" on some other reconfiguration path. In previous work, a 1-track design that can support any set of node-disjoint straight reconfiguration paths, and a more reliable 3-track design that can support any set of node-disjoint rectilinear reconfiguration paths have been proposed. In this paper; we present: (1) A fundamental result regarding the universality of simple \"one-to-one switches\" in m-track 2-D mesh designs in terms of their reconfigurabilities. (2) A 4-track mesh design that can support any set of edge-disjoint (a much less restrictive criterion than node-disjointness) rectilinear reconfiguration paths, and that has 34% less switching overhead and significantly higher actually close-to-optimal, reconfigurability compared to the previously proposed 3-track design. (3) A new 2-track design derived from the above 4-track design that we show can support the same set of reconfiguration paths as the preview 3-track design but with 33% less wiring overhead. (4) Results on the deterministic fault tolerance capabilities (the number of faults guaranteed reconfigurable) of our 4- and 2-track designs, and the previously proposed 1- and 3-track designs.","PeriodicalId":191163,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Annual Symposium on Fault Tolerant Computing","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Annual Symposium on Fault Tolerant Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FTCS.1996.535880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We consider m-track models for constructing fault-tolerant (FT) mesh systems which have one primary and m spare tracks per row and column, switches at the intersection of these tracks, and spare processors at the boundaries. A faulty system is reconfigured by finding for each fault u a reconfiguration path from the fault to a spare in which starting from the fault u, a processor is replaced or "covered" by the nearest "available" succeeding processor on the path-a processor on the path is not available if it is faulty or is used as a "cover" on some other reconfiguration path. In previous work, a 1-track design that can support any set of node-disjoint straight reconfiguration paths, and a more reliable 3-track design that can support any set of node-disjoint rectilinear reconfiguration paths have been proposed. In this paper; we present: (1) A fundamental result regarding the universality of simple "one-to-one switches" in m-track 2-D mesh designs in terms of their reconfigurabilities. (2) A 4-track mesh design that can support any set of edge-disjoint (a much less restrictive criterion than node-disjointness) rectilinear reconfiguration paths, and that has 34% less switching overhead and significantly higher actually close-to-optimal, reconfigurability compared to the previously proposed 3-track design. (3) A new 2-track design derived from the above 4-track design that we show can support the same set of reconfiguration paths as the preview 3-track design but with 33% less wiring overhead. (4) Results on the deterministic fault tolerance capabilities (the number of faults guaranteed reconfigurable) of our 4- and 2-track designs, and the previously proposed 1- and 3-track designs.
网格连接多计算机的硬件高效和高度可重构的四轨和二轨容错设计
我们考虑m轨道模型来构建容错(FT)网格系统,该系统每行和每列有一个主轨道和m个备用轨道,在这些轨道的交叉处有开关,在边界处有备用处理器。故障系统通过为每个故障u找到从故障到备用的重新配置路径来重新配置,其中从故障u开始,处理器被路径上最近的“可用”后续处理器替换或“覆盖”-如果路径上的处理器出现故障或被用作其他重新配置路径上的“覆盖”,则该路径上的处理器不可用。在之前的工作中,已经提出了一种支持任意一组节点不相交直线重构路径的1轨设计,以及一种更可靠的支持任意一组节点不相交直线重构路径的3轨设计。在本文中;我们提出:(1)关于m轨道二维网格设计中简单“一对一开关”在可重构性方面的通用性的一个基本结果。(2)一种4轨网格设计,可以支持任何一组边不相交(比节点不相交限制少得多)的直线重构路径,与之前提出的3轨设计相比,它的切换开销减少了34%,实际接近最优的可重构性也显著提高。(3)从上述4轨设计中衍生出的一种新的2轨设计,我们展示了它可以支持与预览3轨设计相同的重新配置路径,但布线开销减少了33%。(4)我们的4轨和2轨设计以及之前提出的1轨和3轨设计的确定性容错能力(保证可重构的故障数量)的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信