{"title":"Hardware-efficient and highly-reconfigurable 4- and 2-track fault-tolerant designs for mesh-connected multicomputers","authors":"N. Mahapatra, S. Dutt","doi":"10.1109/FTCS.1996.535880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider m-track models for constructing fault-tolerant (FT) mesh systems which have one primary and m spare tracks per row and column, switches at the intersection of these tracks, and spare processors at the boundaries. A faulty system is reconfigured by finding for each fault u a reconfiguration path from the fault to a spare in which starting from the fault u, a processor is replaced or \"covered\" by the nearest \"available\" succeeding processor on the path-a processor on the path is not available if it is faulty or is used as a \"cover\" on some other reconfiguration path. In previous work, a 1-track design that can support any set of node-disjoint straight reconfiguration paths, and a more reliable 3-track design that can support any set of node-disjoint rectilinear reconfiguration paths have been proposed. In this paper; we present: (1) A fundamental result regarding the universality of simple \"one-to-one switches\" in m-track 2-D mesh designs in terms of their reconfigurabilities. (2) A 4-track mesh design that can support any set of edge-disjoint (a much less restrictive criterion than node-disjointness) rectilinear reconfiguration paths, and that has 34% less switching overhead and significantly higher actually close-to-optimal, reconfigurability compared to the previously proposed 3-track design. (3) A new 2-track design derived from the above 4-track design that we show can support the same set of reconfiguration paths as the preview 3-track design but with 33% less wiring overhead. (4) Results on the deterministic fault tolerance capabilities (the number of faults guaranteed reconfigurable) of our 4- and 2-track designs, and the previously proposed 1- and 3-track designs.","PeriodicalId":191163,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Annual Symposium on Fault Tolerant Computing","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Annual Symposium on Fault Tolerant Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FTCS.1996.535880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
We consider m-track models for constructing fault-tolerant (FT) mesh systems which have one primary and m spare tracks per row and column, switches at the intersection of these tracks, and spare processors at the boundaries. A faulty system is reconfigured by finding for each fault u a reconfiguration path from the fault to a spare in which starting from the fault u, a processor is replaced or "covered" by the nearest "available" succeeding processor on the path-a processor on the path is not available if it is faulty or is used as a "cover" on some other reconfiguration path. In previous work, a 1-track design that can support any set of node-disjoint straight reconfiguration paths, and a more reliable 3-track design that can support any set of node-disjoint rectilinear reconfiguration paths have been proposed. In this paper; we present: (1) A fundamental result regarding the universality of simple "one-to-one switches" in m-track 2-D mesh designs in terms of their reconfigurabilities. (2) A 4-track mesh design that can support any set of edge-disjoint (a much less restrictive criterion than node-disjointness) rectilinear reconfiguration paths, and that has 34% less switching overhead and significantly higher actually close-to-optimal, reconfigurability compared to the previously proposed 3-track design. (3) A new 2-track design derived from the above 4-track design that we show can support the same set of reconfiguration paths as the preview 3-track design but with 33% less wiring overhead. (4) Results on the deterministic fault tolerance capabilities (the number of faults guaranteed reconfigurable) of our 4- and 2-track designs, and the previously proposed 1- and 3-track designs.