EVALUATION OF URBAN PUBLIC SPACES’ LANDSCAPE DESIGN PERCEPTIONS WITH SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIATION TECHNIQUE: THE CASE OF ELAZIG CITY

Müge ÜNAL ÇİLEK, Esra ÇETİNKAYA ÖZKAN, Ruya Ardicoglu
{"title":"EVALUATION OF URBAN PUBLIC SPACES’ LANDSCAPE DESIGN PERCEPTIONS WITH SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIATION TECHNIQUE: THE CASE OF ELAZIG CITY","authors":"Müge ÜNAL ÇİLEK, Esra ÇETİNKAYA ÖZKAN, Ruya Ardicoglu","doi":"10.17365/tmd.2022.turkey.27.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: In this study, spatial designers and design students evaluated the perception of three public spaces in Elazig City to determine the similarities and differences in perception. Method: The method of the study consists of four steps: (1) determination of public spaces to evaluate visual perception; (2) scoring the visual perceptions with the semantic differentiation technique using 18 bipolar pairs to evaluate the design characteristics of space. Each bipolar pair was scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1=Negative, 7=Positive). (3) Preparation and application of visual perception questionnaires; (4) performed the statistical analysis. At this stage, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to group the bipolar pairs that are dominant in participant perceptions. MANOVA was used to determine whether the factors changed according to socio-demographic characteristics. Results: The answers of 209 participants studying different design disciplines were evaluated in the study. As a result of the EFA, carried out separately for each public space, the bipolar pairs were classified into three groups: feelings of pleasure, excitation, and dominance. Conclusion: Excitation and dominance in area 1, excitation-dominance and satisfaction in area 2, and excitation and pleasure-dominance in area 3 were determined as factors affecting perception. According to the MANOVA results, while there was no statistical significance between the occupational disciplines and the participants who had not visited the field before (p>0.05), significant differences were found between the participants who were at different levels of design training (p<0.05).","PeriodicalId":142407,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL REFEREED JOURNAL OF DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL REFEREED JOURNAL OF DESIGN AND ARCHITECTURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17365/tmd.2022.turkey.27.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: In this study, spatial designers and design students evaluated the perception of three public spaces in Elazig City to determine the similarities and differences in perception. Method: The method of the study consists of four steps: (1) determination of public spaces to evaluate visual perception; (2) scoring the visual perceptions with the semantic differentiation technique using 18 bipolar pairs to evaluate the design characteristics of space. Each bipolar pair was scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1=Negative, 7=Positive). (3) Preparation and application of visual perception questionnaires; (4) performed the statistical analysis. At this stage, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to group the bipolar pairs that are dominant in participant perceptions. MANOVA was used to determine whether the factors changed according to socio-demographic characteristics. Results: The answers of 209 participants studying different design disciplines were evaluated in the study. As a result of the EFA, carried out separately for each public space, the bipolar pairs were classified into three groups: feelings of pleasure, excitation, and dominance. Conclusion: Excitation and dominance in area 1, excitation-dominance and satisfaction in area 2, and excitation and pleasure-dominance in area 3 were determined as factors affecting perception. According to the MANOVA results, while there was no statistical significance between the occupational disciplines and the participants who had not visited the field before (p>0.05), significant differences were found between the participants who were at different levels of design training (p<0.05).
基于语义分异技术的城市公共空间景观设计感知评价——以拉兹格市为例
目的:在本研究中,空间设计师和设计专业学生对埃拉兹格市三个公共空间的感知进行了评估,以确定感知的异同。方法:研究方法分为四个步骤:(1)确定公共空间,评价视觉感知;(2)利用语义分异技术对空间的视觉感知进行评分,评价空间的设计特征。每一对双相情感障碍以7分的李克特量表评分(1=负,7=正)。(3)视觉感知问卷的编制与应用;(4)进行统计分析。在这个阶段,探索性因素分析(EFA)被用于分组双相情感对是主导参与者的看法。采用方差分析确定这些因素是否随社会人口统计学特征而变化。结果:本研究评估了209名不同设计学科的参与者的回答。作为EFA的结果,每个公共空间都单独进行,双相情感被分为三组:愉悦感、兴奋感和支配感。结论:1区的兴奋和优势、2区的兴奋-优势和满意、3区的兴奋和快乐-优势是影响感知的因素。方差分析结果显示,职业学科与未实地考察的被试之间差异无统计学意义(p>0.05),不同设计训练水平的被试之间差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信