A Comparative Analysis of Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchyand Power Efficient Gathering in Sensor Information System Progressive Conventions

M. Sumathi, H.S Lakmisagar, S. Sandeep, H. Kelagadi
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchyand Power Efficient Gathering in Sensor Information System Progressive Conventions","authors":"M. Sumathi, H.S Lakmisagar, S. Sandeep, H. Kelagadi","doi":"10.1109/RTEICT52294.2021.9573558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) is a web of sensors installed in a random fashion over an area that monitors the physical environmental conditions and parameters like pressure, temperature and moisture. The sensor nodes initially fetch the data from the immediate surroundings which is then aggregated in order to send it to the base station or the sink node. As sensors characteristically are resource-constrained in nature, reducing the energy consumed by the node becomes a challenge. The process used to transfer data from a source to what is known as a route protocol. The three types of succession channels are flat protocols, high-level and local-based protocols. Numerous studies have shown that high-speed traffic improvements improve tracking protocols in terms of deterioration and energy efficiency. Two factors namely energy efficiency and network life time play a very important role in determining the efficiency and capability of the route protocol. In this paper, we emphasize two such principles - LEACH and PEGASIS. In the LEACH protocol, the sensor nodes restructure themselves into groups called clusters and each of these structures are designated with a cluster head node. On the other hand, PEGASIS uses a technique where each individual sensor node communicates solely with its respective neighbour node and inherently. PEGASIS facilitates a chain-based communication structure where turns are taken by each node to transmit data to the base station. In this paper, comparisons between LEACH and PEGASIS protocols are based on network characteristics such as power consumption, packet delivery rate, transmission delays, passing, high percentage and dead node.","PeriodicalId":191410,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT)","volume":"219 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTEICT52294.2021.9573558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) is a web of sensors installed in a random fashion over an area that monitors the physical environmental conditions and parameters like pressure, temperature and moisture. The sensor nodes initially fetch the data from the immediate surroundings which is then aggregated in order to send it to the base station or the sink node. As sensors characteristically are resource-constrained in nature, reducing the energy consumed by the node becomes a challenge. The process used to transfer data from a source to what is known as a route protocol. The three types of succession channels are flat protocols, high-level and local-based protocols. Numerous studies have shown that high-speed traffic improvements improve tracking protocols in terms of deterioration and energy efficiency. Two factors namely energy efficiency and network life time play a very important role in determining the efficiency and capability of the route protocol. In this paper, we emphasize two such principles - LEACH and PEGASIS. In the LEACH protocol, the sensor nodes restructure themselves into groups called clusters and each of these structures are designated with a cluster head node. On the other hand, PEGASIS uses a technique where each individual sensor node communicates solely with its respective neighbour node and inherently. PEGASIS facilitates a chain-based communication structure where turns are taken by each node to transmit data to the base station. In this paper, comparisons between LEACH and PEGASIS protocols are based on network characteristics such as power consumption, packet delivery rate, transmission delays, passing, high percentage and dead node.
传感器信息系统递进惯例中低能量自适应聚类层次与高效聚类的比较分析
无线传感器网络(WSN)是一个传感器网络,以随机方式安装在一个区域,监测物理环境条件和参数,如压力、温度和湿度。传感器节点最初从周围环境中获取数据,然后将其聚合,以便将其发送到基站或接收节点。由于传感器本质上是资源受限的,因此降低节点消耗的能量成为一个挑战。用于将数据从一个源传输到路由协议的过程。三种类型的继承通道分别是平面协议、高级协议和基于本地的协议。大量研究表明,高速交通的改善改善了跟踪协议在退化和能源效率方面的表现。能源效率和网络寿命是决定路由协议效率和性能的重要因素。在本文中,我们强调两个这样的原则- LEACH和PEGASIS。在LEACH协议中,传感器节点将自己重组为称为簇的组,每个这些结构都指定一个簇头节点。另一方面,PEGASIS使用了一种技术,其中每个单独的传感器节点仅与各自的邻居节点和固有节点通信。PEGASIS促进了基于链的通信结构,其中每个节点轮流向基站传输数据。本文从功耗、分组传输率、传输延迟、传输率、高百分比和死节点等网络特性对LEACH协议和PEGASIS协议进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信