Alternative Dispute Resolution for Stakeholders in International Investment Law

D. Collins
{"title":"Alternative Dispute Resolution for Stakeholders in International Investment Law","authors":"D. Collins","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1788243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses several alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms that intend to address complaints from civil society stakeholder groups that may suffer as a consequence of foreign direct investment. ADR methods such as mediation are well suited to resolving international investment disputes of this nature because these methods are more accessible to such stakeholders in the developing world where conventional fora such as civil courts may be unavailable, not independent, or else too expensive. The article explores common stakeholder grievance procedures within the international development banks that fund investment projects in the developing world. It then examines the national contact points procedures established under the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development as well as a new office maintained by the Canadian government for complaints regarding foreign investment in the extractive sector. The article concludes by recommending ways in which participation in these types of processes by investors and other stakeholders can be improved through mandatory provisions in international investment agreements. The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.","PeriodicalId":243835,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Law eJournal","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1788243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article discusses several alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms that intend to address complaints from civil society stakeholder groups that may suffer as a consequence of foreign direct investment. ADR methods such as mediation are well suited to resolving international investment disputes of this nature because these methods are more accessible to such stakeholders in the developing world where conventional fora such as civil courts may be unavailable, not independent, or else too expensive. The article explores common stakeholder grievance procedures within the international development banks that fund investment projects in the developing world. It then examines the national contact points procedures established under the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development as well as a new office maintained by the Canadian government for complaints regarding foreign investment in the extractive sector. The article concludes by recommending ways in which participation in these types of processes by investors and other stakeholders can be improved through mandatory provisions in international investment agreements. The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.
国际投资法中利益相关者的替代性争议解决
本文讨论了几种替代性争议解决(ADR)机制,旨在解决可能因外国直接投资而蒙受损失的民间社会利益相关者团体的投诉。调解等ADR方法非常适合解决这种性质的国际投资争端,因为这些方法对发展中国家的利益相关者来说更容易获得,在这些国家,民事法院等传统法庭可能无法使用,不是独立的,或者过于昂贵。本文探讨了为发展中国家投资项目提供资金的国际开发银行中常见的利益相关者申诉程序。然后,它审查经济合作与发展组织设立的国家联络点程序,以及加拿大政府为处理有关采掘部门外国投资的投诉而设立的一个新办事处。文章最后建议通过国际投资协定中的强制性规定,改善投资者和其他利益相关者对这类过程的参与。作者2012。牛津大学出版社出版。版权所有。牛津大学出版社。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信