Clocked Population Protocols

J. Aspnes
{"title":"Clocked Population Protocols","authors":"J. Aspnes","doi":"10.1145/3087801.3087836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Population protocols are required to converge to the correct answer, and are subject to a fairness condition that guarantees eventual progress, but generally have no internal mechanism for detecting when this progress has occurred. We define an extension to the standard population protocol that provides each agent with a clock signal that indicates when the agent has waited long enough. To simplify the model, we represent \"long enough\" as an infinite time interval, and treat a clocked population protocol as operating over transfinite time. This gives a clean theoretical model that we show how to translate back into finite real-world executions where the clock ticks whenever the underlying protocol is looping or stuck. Over finite time intervals, the protocol behaves as in the standard model. At nonzero limit ordinals ω, ω2, etc., corresponding to clock ticks, the protocol switches to a limit of previous configurations supplemented by an signal registering in an extra component in some of the agents' states. Using transfinite times means that we can represent fairness over sequences of transitions that may include clock ticks with the same definition as over smaller intervals. Using arbitrary ordinals allows using times like ω2 or ω3 to represent convergence that depends on detecting convergence repeatedly at lower levels. We show that a clocked population protocol running in less than ωk time for any fixed k ≥ 2 is equivalent in power to a nondeterministic Turing machine with space complexity logarithmic in the size of the population. A consequence of this equivalence is that any symmetric predicate that can be computed in less than ωk time can be computed in less than ω2 time, which requires only finitely many clock ticks.","PeriodicalId":324970,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3087801.3087836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Population protocols are required to converge to the correct answer, and are subject to a fairness condition that guarantees eventual progress, but generally have no internal mechanism for detecting when this progress has occurred. We define an extension to the standard population protocol that provides each agent with a clock signal that indicates when the agent has waited long enough. To simplify the model, we represent "long enough" as an infinite time interval, and treat a clocked population protocol as operating over transfinite time. This gives a clean theoretical model that we show how to translate back into finite real-world executions where the clock ticks whenever the underlying protocol is looping or stuck. Over finite time intervals, the protocol behaves as in the standard model. At nonzero limit ordinals ω, ω2, etc., corresponding to clock ticks, the protocol switches to a limit of previous configurations supplemented by an signal registering in an extra component in some of the agents' states. Using transfinite times means that we can represent fairness over sequences of transitions that may include clock ticks with the same definition as over smaller intervals. Using arbitrary ordinals allows using times like ω2 or ω3 to represent convergence that depends on detecting convergence repeatedly at lower levels. We show that a clocked population protocol running in less than ωk time for any fixed k ≥ 2 is equivalent in power to a nondeterministic Turing machine with space complexity logarithmic in the size of the population. A consequence of this equivalence is that any symmetric predicate that can be computed in less than ωk time can be computed in less than ω2 time, which requires only finitely many clock ticks.
定时人口协议
人口协议需要收敛于正确答案,并受制于保证最终进展的公平条件,但通常没有内部机制来检测何时发生了这种进展。我们定义了标准填充协议的扩展,该扩展为每个代理提供时钟信号,指示代理何时等待的时间足够长。为了简化模型,我们将“足够长”表示为无限时间间隔,并将时钟种群协议视为在无限时间内运行。这提供了一个清晰的理论模型,我们展示了如何将其转换回有限的现实世界执行,其中每当底层协议循环或卡住时,时钟就会滴答滴答。在有限的时间间隔内,协议的行为与标准模型一致。在非零极限序数ω, ω2等处,对应时钟节拍,协议切换到先前配置的限制,并在某些代理状态的额外组件中注册信号。使用超限时间意味着我们可以表示转换序列的公平性,这些序列可能包括具有与较小间隔相同定义的时钟节拍。使用任意序数允许使用ω2或ω3这样的时间来表示收敛,这取决于在较低水平上重复检测收敛。我们证明,对于任何固定k≥2,在小于ωk时间内运行的时钟种群协议在功率上相当于具有种群大小的空间复杂度为对数的不确定性图灵机。这个等价的一个结果是,任何可以在小于ωk时间内计算的对称谓词都可以在小于ω2时间内计算,这只需要有限的时钟节拍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信