Systems architecting: an emergent discipline?

M. Maier
{"title":"Systems architecting: an emergent discipline?","authors":"M. Maier","doi":"10.1109/AERO.1996.496066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Systems architecting applies the spirit of civil and naval architecture to complex, multi-disciplinary systems in aerospace, electronics, and information processing, The system architect is responsible for the beginning and end of a systems development cycle. The architect emphasizes blending of client needs and technical capabilities to outline a feasible system concept, following the heuristic \"All the really important mistakes are made the first day.\" The architects second major responsibility is to certify the built system as fit for use. Are these activities distinct from other system engineering activities? Is there a recognizable approach to doing them, an architecting approach? The author, along with a group centered at the University of Southern California, thinks so. This paper makes the case.","PeriodicalId":262646,"journal":{"name":"1996 IEEE Aerospace Applications Conference. Proceedings","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1996 IEEE Aerospace Applications Conference. Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.1996.496066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Systems architecting applies the spirit of civil and naval architecture to complex, multi-disciplinary systems in aerospace, electronics, and information processing, The system architect is responsible for the beginning and end of a systems development cycle. The architect emphasizes blending of client needs and technical capabilities to outline a feasible system concept, following the heuristic "All the really important mistakes are made the first day." The architects second major responsibility is to certify the built system as fit for use. Are these activities distinct from other system engineering activities? Is there a recognizable approach to doing them, an architecting approach? The author, along with a group centered at the University of Southern California, thinks so. This paper makes the case.
系统架构:一门新兴学科?
系统架构将民用和海军架构的精神应用于航空航天、电子和信息处理中的复杂的、多学科的系统。系统架构师负责系统开发周期的开始和结束。架构师强调客户需求和技术能力的融合,以勾勒出一个可行的系统概念,遵循启发式“所有真正重要的错误都是在第一天犯的”。架构师的第二个主要职责是证明所构建的系统适合使用。这些活动与其他系统工程活动不同吗?是否有一种可识别的方法来完成它们,一种架构方法?作者和以南加州大学(University of Southern California)为中心的一个研究小组是这么认为的。本文证明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信