The Private Sector Role in Offensive Cyber Operations: Benefits, Issues and Challenges

Irving Lachow
{"title":"The Private Sector Role in Offensive Cyber Operations: Benefits, Issues and Challenges","authors":"Irving Lachow","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2836201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the role that companies play in supporting offensive cyber operations. It finds that contractors play critical roles in two key functions: intelligence/reconnaissance and planning/mission support. The reliance of the U.S. military on cyber contractors brings both benefits and risks. Benefits include access to rapidly evolving technologies and the ability to obtain access to in-demand skills sets quickly and easily. Challenges fall into two categories: domestic policy and international relations. In the former case, the main issues are over-reliance on non-government personnel and challenges in oversight of cyber contractors, which could result in undesirable financial and strategic outcomes. Within the international arena, cyber contractors may affect the balance of power of states. The most likely outcome is that the use of contractors will exacerbate existing power discrepancies between developed and developing countries. However, it is possible that wealthy but less developed states could rely on private sector capability to quickly develop their cyber attack capabilities. Another issue that may affect international relations is uncertainty about the legal status of cyber contractors as combatants. A final concern surrounds the observation that companies may find themselves on both sides of a cyber operation. To accrue the benefits and address the challenges posed by contractor support to offensive cyber operations, several actions should be taken. There needs to be a public debate about the proper role of cyber contractors in military operations. Companies should have a voice in this debate due to their increasingly important role in cyberspace. In addition, the US government and international community must provide guidance to cyber contractors on the role that they should play in offensive cyber operations. Export controls are helpful but they are blunt tools that often bring heavy costs and do not always accomplish their desired outcomes. More precise direction is needed, most likely beginning with norms of behavior.","PeriodicalId":118928,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Cyber-Conflict (Inter-State) (Topic)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Cyber-Conflict (Inter-State) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2836201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper explores the role that companies play in supporting offensive cyber operations. It finds that contractors play critical roles in two key functions: intelligence/reconnaissance and planning/mission support. The reliance of the U.S. military on cyber contractors brings both benefits and risks. Benefits include access to rapidly evolving technologies and the ability to obtain access to in-demand skills sets quickly and easily. Challenges fall into two categories: domestic policy and international relations. In the former case, the main issues are over-reliance on non-government personnel and challenges in oversight of cyber contractors, which could result in undesirable financial and strategic outcomes. Within the international arena, cyber contractors may affect the balance of power of states. The most likely outcome is that the use of contractors will exacerbate existing power discrepancies between developed and developing countries. However, it is possible that wealthy but less developed states could rely on private sector capability to quickly develop their cyber attack capabilities. Another issue that may affect international relations is uncertainty about the legal status of cyber contractors as combatants. A final concern surrounds the observation that companies may find themselves on both sides of a cyber operation. To accrue the benefits and address the challenges posed by contractor support to offensive cyber operations, several actions should be taken. There needs to be a public debate about the proper role of cyber contractors in military operations. Companies should have a voice in this debate due to their increasingly important role in cyberspace. In addition, the US government and international community must provide guidance to cyber contractors on the role that they should play in offensive cyber operations. Export controls are helpful but they are blunt tools that often bring heavy costs and do not always accomplish their desired outcomes. More precise direction is needed, most likely beginning with norms of behavior.
私营部门在进攻性网络作战中的作用:利益、问题和挑战
本文探讨了企业在支持进攻性网络作战中所扮演的角色。报告发现,承包商在情报/侦察和规划/任务支助两个关键职能方面发挥关键作用。美国军方对网络承包商的依赖既有好处,也有风险。好处包括获得快速发展的技术,以及能够快速、轻松地获得所需的技能集。挑战分为两类:国内政策和国际关系。在前一种情况下,主要问题是过度依赖非政府人员和网络承包商监管方面的挑战,这可能导致不良的财务和战略结果。在国际舞台上,网络承包商可能会影响国家的力量平衡。最可能的结果是,使用承包商将加剧发达国家和发展中国家之间现有的权力差距。然而,富裕但欠发达的国家有可能依靠私营部门的能力,迅速发展自己的网络攻击能力。另一个可能影响国际关系的问题是网络承包商作为战斗人员的法律地位的不确定性。最后一个担忧是,人们观察到,企业可能会发现自己处于网络行动的两面。为了积累收益并应对承包商支持进攻性网络行动所带来的挑战,应采取若干行动。有必要就网络承包商在军事行动中的适当角色展开公开辩论。公司应该在这场辩论中有发言权,因为它们在网络空间中扮演着越来越重要的角色。此外,美国政府和国际社会必须就网络承包商在进攻性网络行动中应发挥的作用向其提供指导。出口管制是有帮助的,但它们是生硬的工具,往往会带来沉重的成本,而且并不总能实现预期的结果。需要更精确的指导,最有可能从行为规范开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信