Scaling up evaluation of code search tools through developer usage metrics

Kostadin Damevski, D. Shepherd, L. Pollock
{"title":"Scaling up evaluation of code search tools through developer usage metrics","authors":"Kostadin Damevski, D. Shepherd, L. Pollock","doi":"10.1109/SANER.2015.7081828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Code search is a fundamental part of program understanding and software maintenance and thus researchers have developed many techniques to improve its performance, such as corpora preprocessing and query reformulation. Unfortunately, to date, evaluations of code search techniques have largely been in lab settings, while scaling and transitioning to effective practical use demands more empirical feedback from the field. This paper addresses that need by studying metrics based on automatically-gathered anonymous field data from code searches to infer user satisfaction. We describe techniques for addressing important concerns, such as how privacy is retained and how the overhead on the interactive system is minimized. We perform controlled user and field studies which identify metrics that correlate with user satisfaction, enabling the future evaluation of search tools through anonymous usage data. In comparing our metrics to similar metrics used in Internet search we observe differences in the relationship of some of the metrics to user satisfaction. As we further explore the data, we also present a predictive multi-metric model that achieves accuracy of over 70% in determining query satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":355949,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2015.7081828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Code search is a fundamental part of program understanding and software maintenance and thus researchers have developed many techniques to improve its performance, such as corpora preprocessing and query reformulation. Unfortunately, to date, evaluations of code search techniques have largely been in lab settings, while scaling and transitioning to effective practical use demands more empirical feedback from the field. This paper addresses that need by studying metrics based on automatically-gathered anonymous field data from code searches to infer user satisfaction. We describe techniques for addressing important concerns, such as how privacy is retained and how the overhead on the interactive system is minimized. We perform controlled user and field studies which identify metrics that correlate with user satisfaction, enabling the future evaluation of search tools through anonymous usage data. In comparing our metrics to similar metrics used in Internet search we observe differences in the relationship of some of the metrics to user satisfaction. As we further explore the data, we also present a predictive multi-metric model that achieves accuracy of over 70% in determining query satisfaction.
通过开发人员使用度量来扩大代码搜索工具的评估
代码搜索是程序理解和软件维护的基本组成部分,因此研究人员开发了许多技术来提高其性能,如语料库预处理和查询重构。不幸的是,到目前为止,代码搜索技术的评估主要是在实验室环境中进行的,而扩展和过渡到有效的实际使用需要更多来自该领域的经验反馈。本文通过研究基于从代码搜索中自动收集的匿名字段数据的度量来推断用户满意度,从而解决了这一需求。我们描述了解决重要问题的技术,例如如何保留隐私以及如何最小化交互系统的开销。我们进行受控的用户和现场研究,确定与用户满意度相关的指标,从而通过匿名使用数据对搜索工具进行未来评估。在将我们的指标与互联网搜索中使用的类似指标进行比较时,我们观察到一些指标与用户满意度之间的关系存在差异。随着我们对数据的进一步研究,我们还提出了一个预测多度量模型,在确定查询满意度方面达到了70%以上的准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信