‘Though I Speak with the Tongues of Men and of Angels…’:

A. Sinclair
{"title":"‘Though I Speak with the Tongues of Men and of Angels…’:","authors":"A. Sinclair","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv16kkxf8.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay examines a variety of medical and religious texts from mid-nineteenth-century Spain. It explores the degree to which their writing--as a medium that betrays more than a simple message of content--indicates to us how far they were allied to other social authorities, and specifically to the Church, in a power structure sealed by language. In addition, these texts demonstrate that professional writing intended for popular dissemination had common elements of approach and expression that transcended disciplinary or confessional boundaries. Both medical and religious texts reveal a high level of concern with maintaining positions of authority. This is partly related to issues of social power (the habitual implied audiences of such texts being women, children, and the lower classes). At the same time, the concern with power provides exemplification of anxieties about gender and degeneration, against which the structures and skills of rhetoric are brought in as weapons of control. The body of the essay examines the ways in which the two fields of discourse converge, so that the Church speaks of matters of health while medical texts borrow theological terminology. This convergence is revealed further in the authorities they cite, and in their approach to linguistic register. Both employ Latin and complex syntax as ploys to exclude the unlettered and to designate an implied minority readership. The project of control of the readership through rhetoric is revealed as a prime reason for using it. At the same time, as revealed in later-nineteenth-century texts, the emotive powers of rhetoric contain the potential for a counter-control movement that stands in tension with the initial use of rhetoric to assert social power. ********** A commonplace in Spanish culture of the nineteenth century is the opposition not simply of political parties or tendencies, but of sectors of belief and non-belief. We tend rather readily when looking at this period to associate progress with liberal politics, and resistance to progress with the Catholic Church. Within such a division of tendencies, the sphere of medical knowledge, for example, would naturally be associated with the forces of progress. It is true that members of the medical profession in Spain were keenly interested in the work of their peers in other European countries, yet when we consider the nature of their writings, a different picture emerges. I shall be concerned in this essay less with the content of what they wrote about than with their manner of writing. To do so I shall refer to a variety of medical and religious texts produced in the second half of the nineteenth century. The majority of texts with which I am concerned were published between 1857 and 1868 (the last decade of the reign of Isabel II) and show a clear level of common elements of discourse. My aim is to explore the degree to which their writing--as a medium that betrays more than a simple message of content--indicates to us how far they were allied to other social authorities, and specifically to the Church, in a power structure sealed by language. In addition, these texts demonstrate that professional writing intended for popular dissemination had common elements of approach and expression that transcended disciplinary or confessional boundaries. Medical discourse in nineteenth-century Spain has come under scrutiny in recent years. Aldaraca (1989; 1992) has examined how the hysteric in Spain, as elsewhere, was constructed by the language that defined her, and how the construction of woman was along religious and social lines (1991); Valis (1992; 1994; 2000) provides a similar contextualization. Yet the most significant contribution to out familiarity with such discourse is the anthology compiled by Jagoe, Blanco, and Enriquez de Salamanca (1998). This anthology does not, however, provide us with much primary material in the field of religious discourse, the exception being Claret's views on what was needed in a woman's education (1862a). …","PeriodicalId":247246,"journal":{"name":"Putting it About","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Putting it About","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv16kkxf8.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay examines a variety of medical and religious texts from mid-nineteenth-century Spain. It explores the degree to which their writing--as a medium that betrays more than a simple message of content--indicates to us how far they were allied to other social authorities, and specifically to the Church, in a power structure sealed by language. In addition, these texts demonstrate that professional writing intended for popular dissemination had common elements of approach and expression that transcended disciplinary or confessional boundaries. Both medical and religious texts reveal a high level of concern with maintaining positions of authority. This is partly related to issues of social power (the habitual implied audiences of such texts being women, children, and the lower classes). At the same time, the concern with power provides exemplification of anxieties about gender and degeneration, against which the structures and skills of rhetoric are brought in as weapons of control. The body of the essay examines the ways in which the two fields of discourse converge, so that the Church speaks of matters of health while medical texts borrow theological terminology. This convergence is revealed further in the authorities they cite, and in their approach to linguistic register. Both employ Latin and complex syntax as ploys to exclude the unlettered and to designate an implied minority readership. The project of control of the readership through rhetoric is revealed as a prime reason for using it. At the same time, as revealed in later-nineteenth-century texts, the emotive powers of rhetoric contain the potential for a counter-control movement that stands in tension with the initial use of rhetoric to assert social power. ********** A commonplace in Spanish culture of the nineteenth century is the opposition not simply of political parties or tendencies, but of sectors of belief and non-belief. We tend rather readily when looking at this period to associate progress with liberal politics, and resistance to progress with the Catholic Church. Within such a division of tendencies, the sphere of medical knowledge, for example, would naturally be associated with the forces of progress. It is true that members of the medical profession in Spain were keenly interested in the work of their peers in other European countries, yet when we consider the nature of their writings, a different picture emerges. I shall be concerned in this essay less with the content of what they wrote about than with their manner of writing. To do so I shall refer to a variety of medical and religious texts produced in the second half of the nineteenth century. The majority of texts with which I am concerned were published between 1857 and 1868 (the last decade of the reign of Isabel II) and show a clear level of common elements of discourse. My aim is to explore the degree to which their writing--as a medium that betrays more than a simple message of content--indicates to us how far they were allied to other social authorities, and specifically to the Church, in a power structure sealed by language. In addition, these texts demonstrate that professional writing intended for popular dissemination had common elements of approach and expression that transcended disciplinary or confessional boundaries. Medical discourse in nineteenth-century Spain has come under scrutiny in recent years. Aldaraca (1989; 1992) has examined how the hysteric in Spain, as elsewhere, was constructed by the language that defined her, and how the construction of woman was along religious and social lines (1991); Valis (1992; 1994; 2000) provides a similar contextualization. Yet the most significant contribution to out familiarity with such discourse is the anthology compiled by Jagoe, Blanco, and Enriquez de Salamanca (1998). This anthology does not, however, provide us with much primary material in the field of religious discourse, the exception being Claret's views on what was needed in a woman's education (1862a). …
“我虽能说万人的方言,又能说天使的方言……”
这篇文章考察了19世纪中期西班牙的各种医学和宗教文献。它探讨了他们的写作在多大程度上——作为一种媒介,它背叛的不仅仅是简单的内容信息——向我们表明,在一个由语言密封的权力结构中,他们与其他社会权威,特别是教会的关系有多密切。此外,这些文本表明,旨在大众传播的专业写作具有超越学科或忏悔界限的共同方法和表达元素。医学和宗教文献都显示出对维持权威地位的高度关注。这在一定程度上与社会权力问题有关(此类文本的习惯性隐含受众是妇女、儿童和下层阶级)。与此同时,对权力的关注提供了对性别和退化的焦虑的例证,修辞的结构和技巧被作为控制的武器引入。文章的主体检查的方式,其中两个领域的话语汇合,使教会谈到健康问题,而医学文本借用神学术语。这种趋同在他们引用的权威文献和他们对语言语域的研究中得到了进一步的揭示。两者都使用拉丁语和复杂的语法作为排除非字母的策略,并指定一个隐含的少数读者。通过修辞来控制读者的目的是使用修辞的主要原因。与此同时,正如19世纪后期的文本所揭示的那样,修辞的情感力量包含了反控制运动的潜力,这种运动与最初使用修辞来维护社会权力之间存在紧张关系。**********在19世纪的西班牙文化中,一个司空见惯的现象是反对的不仅仅是政党或倾向,而是信仰和无信仰的部分。回顾这一时期,我们很容易将进步与自由主义政治联系起来,将对进步的抵制与天主教会联系起来。在这种倾向的划分中,例如,医学知识领域自然会与进步的力量联系在一起。的确,西班牙的医学专业人士对其他欧洲国家同行的工作非常感兴趣,然而,当我们考虑到他们作品的性质时,就会出现不同的情况。在这篇文章中,我关心的不是他们所写的内容,而是他们的写作方式。为此,我将参考19世纪下半叶产生的各种医学和宗教文献。我所关注的大多数文本出版于1857年至1868年之间(伊莎贝尔二世统治的最后十年),并显示了话语的共同元素的清晰水平。我的目的是探索他们的写作——作为一种媒介,它背叛的不仅仅是简单的内容信息——在多大程度上向我们表明,在一个由语言密封的权力结构中,他们与其他社会权威,特别是教会的关系有多密切。此外,这些文本表明,旨在大众传播的专业写作具有超越学科或忏悔界限的共同方法和表达元素。近年来,19世纪西班牙的医学论述受到了密切关注。Aldaraca (1989;1992)研究了西班牙和其他地方的歇斯底里是如何被定义她的语言所建构的,以及女性是如何沿着宗教和社会的界限被建构的(1991);瓦里(1992;1994;2000)提供了类似的情境化。然而,让我们熟悉这种话语的最重要贡献是雅戈、布兰科和恩里克斯·德·萨拉曼卡(1998)编写的选集。然而,这本选集并没有为我们提供太多宗教话语领域的原始材料,唯一的例外是克莱特关于女性教育需要什么的观点(1862a)。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信