The Birth of Regional Arrangements and the Intersec- tion of Mutual Recognition: Connection-Comparison between the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty (1951) and the ROK-U.S. Mutual Defense Treaty (1953)

Soong-bae Kim
{"title":"The Birth of Regional Arrangements and the Intersec- tion of Mutual Recognition: Connection-Comparison between the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty (1951) and the ROK-U.S. Mutual Defense Treaty (1953)","authors":"Soong-bae Kim","doi":"10.33127/kdps.2023.44.2.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan, which was born in 1951, and the Mutual Defense Treaty Between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America, which was born in 1953, from the viewpoint of connection-comparison. First, in the background of the two treaties was the emphasis laid on the United Nations Charter, which advocated internationalism. Second, there was a difference in the concept of defense between the two treaties. The Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan was conscious of international communism, but placed more weight on securing the autonomy of US forces in Japan than on defense of Japan. On the other hand, the Mutual Defense Treaty Between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America, which declared joint defense and mutual aid, had a device to block international communism, Japanese right-wing totalitarianism, and South Korea's reunification of the North but there was a crack where the function of the Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan, which was concluded earlier, was added. Third, before signing the Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan, Shigeru Yoshida envisioned a regional security that would prohibit South Korea from possessing military power at the same level as Japan, which cannot have military power due to the Peace Constitution. To him, Korea was a buffer zone. Meanwhile, Syngman Rhee's multilateral regional security initiative also foundered, but his hope for a stronger treaty than the Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan was relatively fulfilled. However, even after the birth of the Mutual Defense Treaty Between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America, Syngman Rhee viewed Japan as a threatening country, and Yoshida viewed the power of the Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan as useful against Korea as well.","PeriodicalId":281089,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Association for Political and Diplomatic History","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Association for Political and Diplomatic History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33127/kdps.2023.44.2.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan, which was born in 1951, and the Mutual Defense Treaty Between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America, which was born in 1953, from the viewpoint of connection-comparison. First, in the background of the two treaties was the emphasis laid on the United Nations Charter, which advocated internationalism. Second, there was a difference in the concept of defense between the two treaties. The Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan was conscious of international communism, but placed more weight on securing the autonomy of US forces in Japan than on defense of Japan. On the other hand, the Mutual Defense Treaty Between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America, which declared joint defense and mutual aid, had a device to block international communism, Japanese right-wing totalitarianism, and South Korea's reunification of the North but there was a crack where the function of the Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan, which was concluded earlier, was added. Third, before signing the Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan, Shigeru Yoshida envisioned a regional security that would prohibit South Korea from possessing military power at the same level as Japan, which cannot have military power due to the Peace Constitution. To him, Korea was a buffer zone. Meanwhile, Syngman Rhee's multilateral regional security initiative also foundered, but his hope for a stronger treaty than the Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan was relatively fulfilled. However, even after the birth of the Mutual Defense Treaty Between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America, Syngman Rhee viewed Japan as a threatening country, and Yoshida viewed the power of the Security Treaty Between the United States and Japan as useful against Korea as well.
区域安排的诞生与互认的交汇:日美关系比较。《安保条约》(1951年)和《韩美安保条约》。共同防御条约(1953年)
本文从关联比较的角度考察了1951年签订的《美日安保条约》和1953年签订的《大韩民国与美利坚合众国共同防御条约》。首先,这两个条约的背景是强调《联合国宪章》,它提倡国际主义。其次,这两个条约在防御概念上存在差异。《美日安保条约》意识到国际共产主义,但更重视确保驻日美军的自治权,而不是保卫日本。另一方面,宣布共同防御和互助的《韩美共同防御条约》虽然有阻止国际共产主义、日本右翼极权主义、南朝鲜统一的手段,但在加入之前签订的《美日安保条约》的功能上存在漏洞。第三,在签署《美日安保条约》之前,吉田茂设想了一种地区安全,即禁止韩国拥有与根据《和平宪法》不能拥有军事力量的日本同等水平的军事力量。对他来说,韩国是一个缓冲地带。与此同时,李承晚的多边地区安全倡议也失败了,但他希望达成比《美日安保条约》更强有力的条约的愿望相对实现了。然而,即使在《韩美共同防御条约》诞生后,李承晚仍将日本视为威胁国家,吉田也将《美日安保条约》的力量视为对朝鲜有利的力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信