“We hebben afgesproken dat…”: hoe verantwoorden zorgprofessionals hun handelen in rapportages?

Keun Young Sliedrecht, Els van der Pool
{"title":"“We hebben afgesproken dat…”: hoe verantwoorden zorgprofessionals hun handelen in rapportages?","authors":"Keun Young Sliedrecht, Els van der Pool","doi":"10.5117/tvt2021.2.006.youn","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n “We agreed to….”: how do health care professionals account for their performance in reports?\n \n For many health care professionals, reporting is a daily, necessary task. Reports play a key role in the accountability practice of the care provided, like quality assurance, evaluation, coordination and continuity of health care. However, to write an efficient report in the Electronic Client Dossier (ECD) is not an easy task for professionals. Research illuminates that health care reports do not meet the required quality level, stressing the importance to address writing skills of these professionals.\n In this study, consisting of 50 health reports of two mental health care organizations, we explore accountability practices of health care providers in reports. The analysis demonstrates how professionals actively give accounts for their performance at two levels, namely (1) the interaction: accounts for the accomplishment of mutual understanding and the unfolding of the institutional conversation and (2) the care content: accounts for the directions of the health care process and/or future steps. These practices of ‘being accountable’ illuminate how the writing process of professionals is embedded in the institutional context of health care. Therefore, to improve the efficiency and quality of reports, it is crucial to train the strategic competence of professionals instead of just training writing skills.","PeriodicalId":192335,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/tvt2021.2.006.youn","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“We agreed to….”: how do health care professionals account for their performance in reports? For many health care professionals, reporting is a daily, necessary task. Reports play a key role in the accountability practice of the care provided, like quality assurance, evaluation, coordination and continuity of health care. However, to write an efficient report in the Electronic Client Dossier (ECD) is not an easy task for professionals. Research illuminates that health care reports do not meet the required quality level, stressing the importance to address writing skills of these professionals. In this study, consisting of 50 health reports of two mental health care organizations, we explore accountability practices of health care providers in reports. The analysis demonstrates how professionals actively give accounts for their performance at two levels, namely (1) the interaction: accounts for the accomplishment of mutual understanding and the unfolding of the institutional conversation and (2) the care content: accounts for the directions of the health care process and/or future steps. These practices of ‘being accountable’ illuminate how the writing process of professionals is embedded in the institutional context of health care. Therefore, to improve the efficiency and quality of reports, it is crucial to train the strategic competence of professionals instead of just training writing skills.
“我们已经同意……”:医疗专业人员如何在报告中证明他们的行为是正当的?
“我们同意....:卫生保健专业人员如何在报告中说明他们的表现?对于许多卫生保健专业人员来说,报告是一项日常的、必要的任务。报告在提供保健的问责制实践中发挥关键作用,例如保健的质量保证、评价、协调和连续性。然而,对于专业人员来说,在电子客户档案(ECD)中编写有效的报告并不是一件容易的事情。在本研究中,由两家精神卫生保健机构的50份健康报告组成,我们探讨卫生保健提供者在报告中的问责做法。分析显示了专业人员如何积极地在两个层面上解释他们的表现,即(1)互动:说明相互理解的完成和机构对话的展开;(2)护理内容:说明卫生保健过程和/或未来步骤的方向。这些“负责任”的做法阐明了专业人员的写作过程如何嵌入卫生保健的制度背景。因此,为了提高报告的效率和质量,培养专业人员的战略能力是至关重要的,而不仅仅是培养写作技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信