Introduction: Historicism, Modernity and Religion

Monica M. Ringer
{"title":"Introduction: Historicism, Modernity and Religion","authors":"Monica M. Ringer","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474478731.003.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historicism, as the premise of historical context, together with ideas of universalism and progress, created a new epistemological and methodological landscape that by the 19th century demanded a redefinition and reconceptualization of the nature and function of religion. Muslim intellectuals, like modernists in other religious traditions, historicized Islamic history and proposed a new approach to the Quran, Hadith and the nature of tradition itself. They rejected tradition as historically constructed and thus contingent, proposing that tradition as content, and precedent as method, be discarded in favor of the reinterpretation of the ‘essence’ of Islam according to contemporary needs. Studies of modernity should shift from an attempt to align definitions with empirical realities, and instead focus on the emergence of claims to the modern. This enables us to understand commonalities and differences among various modernities – and to avoid falling into worn paths of seeing modernity as a process of diffusion from the West to the ‘Rest’ while also not asserting the irrelevance of Europe. Islamic modernism has been treated as an instrumentalist language in the historiography of Middle Eastern modernization projects, and not appreciated for its deeply theological innovations and participatory role in engendering modernity.","PeriodicalId":128040,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Modernism and the Re-Enchantment of the Sacred in the Age of History","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Modernism and the Re-Enchantment of the Sacred in the Age of History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474478731.003.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historicism, as the premise of historical context, together with ideas of universalism and progress, created a new epistemological and methodological landscape that by the 19th century demanded a redefinition and reconceptualization of the nature and function of religion. Muslim intellectuals, like modernists in other religious traditions, historicized Islamic history and proposed a new approach to the Quran, Hadith and the nature of tradition itself. They rejected tradition as historically constructed and thus contingent, proposing that tradition as content, and precedent as method, be discarded in favor of the reinterpretation of the ‘essence’ of Islam according to contemporary needs. Studies of modernity should shift from an attempt to align definitions with empirical realities, and instead focus on the emergence of claims to the modern. This enables us to understand commonalities and differences among various modernities – and to avoid falling into worn paths of seeing modernity as a process of diffusion from the West to the ‘Rest’ while also not asserting the irrelevance of Europe. Islamic modernism has been treated as an instrumentalist language in the historiography of Middle Eastern modernization projects, and not appreciated for its deeply theological innovations and participatory role in engendering modernity.
导论:历史主义、现代性与宗教
历史主义,作为历史背景的前提,与普遍主义和进步思想一起,创造了一种新的认识论和方法论景观,到19世纪,要求对宗教的性质和功能进行重新定义和重新概念化。与其他宗教传统的现代主义者一样,穆斯林知识分子将伊斯兰历史历史化,并对《古兰经》、《圣训》和传统本身的本质提出了新的看法。他们拒绝传统,认为传统是历史建构的,因此是偶然的,建议放弃传统作为内容,先例作为方法,以支持根据当代需要重新解释伊斯兰教的“本质”。现代性研究应该从试图将定义与经验现实结合起来,转而关注对现代性的要求的出现。这使我们能够理解各种现代性之间的共性和差异,并避免陷入将现代性视为从西方向“其他地区”扩散的过程的老路,同时也不会断言欧洲的无关性。伊斯兰现代主义在中东现代化项目的历史编纂中被视为一种工具主义语言,并没有因其深刻的神学创新和在产生现代性方面的参与作用而受到赞赏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信