Comparative analysis of internet topology data sets

M. A. Canbaz, Jay Thom, M. H. Gunes
{"title":"Comparative analysis of internet topology data sets","authors":"M. A. Canbaz, Jay Thom, M. H. Gunes","doi":"10.1109/INFCOMW.2017.8116451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several platforms continuously collect and provide Internet topology measurement data to the public. In this paper, we analyze the data provided by such public Internet topology measurement platforms. In particular, we analyze the router level probe data sets from USC/ISI Ant census, CAIDA Archipelago (Ark), UW information Plane (iPlane), Measurement Lab (M-Lab), and RIPE NCC Atlas and Autonomous System level BGP data sets from CAIDA, Internet Research Lab (IRL), and CIDR. We provide insights into the characteristics of the platforms and the properties of the data sets sampled by these platforms. We further compare the topology coverage of these platforms.","PeriodicalId":306731,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOMW.2017.8116451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Several platforms continuously collect and provide Internet topology measurement data to the public. In this paper, we analyze the data provided by such public Internet topology measurement platforms. In particular, we analyze the router level probe data sets from USC/ISI Ant census, CAIDA Archipelago (Ark), UW information Plane (iPlane), Measurement Lab (M-Lab), and RIPE NCC Atlas and Autonomous System level BGP data sets from CAIDA, Internet Research Lab (IRL), and CIDR. We provide insights into the characteristics of the platforms and the properties of the data sets sampled by these platforms. We further compare the topology coverage of these platforms.
互联网拓扑数据集的比较分析
多个平台不断收集并向公众提供互联网拓扑测量数据。本文对这些公共互联网拓扑测量平台提供的数据进行了分析。我们特别分析了来自USC/ISI Ant普查、CAIDA群岛(Ark)、UW信息平面(iPlane)、测量实验室(M-Lab)和RIPE NCC Atlas的路由器级探测数据集,以及来自CAIDA、互联网研究实验室(IRL)和CIDR的自治系统级BGP数据集。我们提供了对这些平台的特征和这些平台采样数据集的属性的见解。我们进一步比较了这些平台的拓扑覆盖范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信