The Program on the Surgical Control of the Hyperlipidemias (POSCH) and the Lipid Regulatory Hypothesis

William E. Feeman, Jr., Stanley E. Williams, H. Buchwald
{"title":"The Program on the Surgical Control of the Hyperlipidemias (POSCH) and the Lipid Regulatory Hypothesis","authors":"William E. Feeman, Jr., Stanley E. Williams, H. Buchwald","doi":"10.33590/emjcardiol/10313436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Lipid Regulatory Hypothesis (LRH) states that the best way to regress atherosclerotic plaque is to simultaneously decrease the cholesterol being transported into the arterial wall by low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and increase the cholesterol being removed from the arterial wall, via reverse cholesterol transport, by high-density lipoprotein (HDL). The cholesterol retention fraction (CRF) is defined as (LDL cholesterol minus HDL cholesterol) divided by LDL cholesterol. The Program on the Surgical Control of the Hyperlipidemias (POSCH), which employed partial ileal bypass as the intervention modality, was selected for verification of the LRH and the validity of the CRF.\nMethods: POSCH coronary arteriographic plaque progression or non-progression (stabilisation/regression) from baseline to 3 years was stratified on a five-by-five factorial grid with 25 cohort cells combining LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol changes from baseline to 1 year following intervention. Predictive capacity for arteriography changes of LDL cholesterol and CRF were compared. Statistics used were logistic regressions.\nResults: There were 731 paired arteriographic assessments of individual POSCH patients: 163 progression (22%) and 568 non-progression (stabilisation/regression) (78%). A reciprocal LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol relationship represented as a five-by-five factorial showed non-progression above and progression below the dividing diagonal. 100% (163/163) of patients with plaque progression had a rise in their CRF; and 100% (568/568) of patients with plaque non-progression had a fall in their CRF. LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and CRF were all highly significant predictors of plaque progression and non-progression (p<0.0001).\nConclusion: In POSCH, the partial ileal bypass-induced changes in the LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and the CRF are highly correlated with the sequential coronary arteriography changes of plaque progression and non-progression. This study affirms that individual patient prognosis can be predicted by the magnitude of response to lipid intervention.","PeriodicalId":284912,"journal":{"name":"EMJ Cardiology","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMJ Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjcardiol/10313436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The Lipid Regulatory Hypothesis (LRH) states that the best way to regress atherosclerotic plaque is to simultaneously decrease the cholesterol being transported into the arterial wall by low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and increase the cholesterol being removed from the arterial wall, via reverse cholesterol transport, by high-density lipoprotein (HDL). The cholesterol retention fraction (CRF) is defined as (LDL cholesterol minus HDL cholesterol) divided by LDL cholesterol. The Program on the Surgical Control of the Hyperlipidemias (POSCH), which employed partial ileal bypass as the intervention modality, was selected for verification of the LRH and the validity of the CRF. Methods: POSCH coronary arteriographic plaque progression or non-progression (stabilisation/regression) from baseline to 3 years was stratified on a five-by-five factorial grid with 25 cohort cells combining LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol changes from baseline to 1 year following intervention. Predictive capacity for arteriography changes of LDL cholesterol and CRF were compared. Statistics used were logistic regressions. Results: There were 731 paired arteriographic assessments of individual POSCH patients: 163 progression (22%) and 568 non-progression (stabilisation/regression) (78%). A reciprocal LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol relationship represented as a five-by-five factorial showed non-progression above and progression below the dividing diagonal. 100% (163/163) of patients with plaque progression had a rise in their CRF; and 100% (568/568) of patients with plaque non-progression had a fall in their CRF. LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and CRF were all highly significant predictors of plaque progression and non-progression (p<0.0001). Conclusion: In POSCH, the partial ileal bypass-induced changes in the LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and the CRF are highly correlated with the sequential coronary arteriography changes of plaque progression and non-progression. This study affirms that individual patient prognosis can be predicted by the magnitude of response to lipid intervention.
高脂血症手术控制计划(POSCH)和脂质调节假说
背景:脂质调节假说(LRH)认为,恢复动脉粥样硬化斑块的最佳方法是同时减少通过低密度脂蛋白(LDL)转运到动脉壁的胆固醇,同时增加高密度脂蛋白(HDL)通过逆向胆固醇转运从动脉壁移除的胆固醇。胆固醇保留分数(CRF)定义为(LDL胆固醇减去HDL胆固醇)除以LDL胆固醇。选择采用部分回肠旁路作为干预方式的高脂血症手术控制项目(Program on The Surgical Control of The hyperlipide血症,POSCH)来验证LRH和CRF的有效性。方法:从基线到3年的POSCH冠状动脉斑块进展或无进展(稳定/消退)在5乘5的因子网格上分层,25个队列细胞结合LDL胆固醇和HDL胆固醇从基线到干预后1年的变化。比较LDL胆固醇和CRF对动脉造影变化的预测能力。使用的统计数据为逻辑回归。结果:对单个POSCH患者进行了731次配对动脉造影评估:163例进展(22%)和568例无进展(稳定/退化)(78%)。用5乘5的阶乘表示的LDL胆固醇和HDL胆固醇的倒数关系显示,在分割对角线上没有进展,在对角线下则有进展。100%(163/163)的斑块进展患者的CRF升高;100%(568/568)斑块无进展患者的CRF下降。LDL胆固醇、HDL胆固醇和CRF都是斑块进展和非进展的高度显著预测因子(p<0.0001)。结论:在POSCH中,部分回肠旁路引起的LDL胆固醇、HDL胆固醇和CRF的变化与斑块进展和非进展的序贯冠状动脉造影变化高度相关。本研究证实,个体患者的预后可以通过对脂质干预的反应程度来预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信