Sovereign Debt, Default Risk, and the Liquidity of Government Bonds

Gastón Chaumont
{"title":"Sovereign Debt, Default Risk, and the Liquidity of Government Bonds","authors":"Gastón Chaumont","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3714870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What is the role of liquidity in bond markets on government's debt issuances and default decisions? How do liquidity and risk premia interact in equilibrium and over the business cycle? To study these questions, this paper extends an incomplete markets model with endogenous default a la Eaton and Gersovitz (1981) by introducing liquidity frictions in sovereign bond markets. Liquidity frictions are endogenous in the model and determined by search frictions in sovereign debt markets. In order to trade, investors need to meet dealers in bond markets and, due to search frictions, trade is not guaranteed at each point in time. This assumption endogenously generates a liquidity premium on the price of debt. Moreover, search is assumed to be directed so investors willing to trade bonds face a trade-off between the amount of transaction fees that they are willing to pay and the probability of trading. As a result, in equilibrium, the optimal balance of this trade-off varies as the aggregate state of the economy evolves and liquidity varies endogenously over the business cycle. The model is used to study Greek's debt crisis in 2011-2012. We find that liquidity premium significantly contribute to debt spreads during that episode. Also, we Argentinian data to obtain results comparable to previous literature. The model is able to match liquidity measures while at the same time being able to reproduce standard business cycle moments of emerging economies.","PeriodicalId":244949,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3714870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

What is the role of liquidity in bond markets on government's debt issuances and default decisions? How do liquidity and risk premia interact in equilibrium and over the business cycle? To study these questions, this paper extends an incomplete markets model with endogenous default a la Eaton and Gersovitz (1981) by introducing liquidity frictions in sovereign bond markets. Liquidity frictions are endogenous in the model and determined by search frictions in sovereign debt markets. In order to trade, investors need to meet dealers in bond markets and, due to search frictions, trade is not guaranteed at each point in time. This assumption endogenously generates a liquidity premium on the price of debt. Moreover, search is assumed to be directed so investors willing to trade bonds face a trade-off between the amount of transaction fees that they are willing to pay and the probability of trading. As a result, in equilibrium, the optimal balance of this trade-off varies as the aggregate state of the economy evolves and liquidity varies endogenously over the business cycle. The model is used to study Greek's debt crisis in 2011-2012. We find that liquidity premium significantly contribute to debt spreads during that episode. Also, we Argentinian data to obtain results comparable to previous literature. The model is able to match liquidity measures while at the same time being able to reproduce standard business cycle moments of emerging economies.
主权债务、违约风险和政府债券的流动性
债券市场的流动性在政府债券发行和违约决策中的作用是什么?在均衡和商业周期中,流动性和风险溢价是如何相互作用的?为了研究这些问题,本文通过引入主权债券市场的流动性摩擦,扩展了Eaton和Gersovitz(1981)提出的具有内生违约的不完全市场模型。流动性摩擦在模型中是内生的,由主权债务市场的搜索摩擦决定。为了进行交易,投资者需要与债券市场的交易商见面,由于搜索摩擦,交易在每个时间点都不能得到保证。这一假设内生地产生了债务价格的流动性溢价。此外,假设搜索是定向的,因此愿意交易债券的投资者面临他们愿意支付的交易费用与交易概率之间的权衡。因此,在均衡中,这种权衡的最优平衡随着经济总体状态的演变和流动性在商业周期内的内生变化而变化。该模型用于研究2011-2012年的希腊债务危机。我们发现,在这一时期,流动性溢价对债务息差有显著贡献。同时,我们对阿根廷的数据进行分析,得到与以往文献相当的结果。该模型能够匹配流动性指标,同时能够重现新兴经济体的标准商业周期时刻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信