Fear Without Rationality: Emotions in Lithuanian Foreign Policy

Benas Brunalas
{"title":"Fear Without Rationality: Emotions in Lithuanian Foreign Policy","authors":"Benas Brunalas","doi":"10.1515/lfpr-2017-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The paper reflects on the conception of the phenomenon of fear employed in the international relations theory. A critique of understanding of fear as a rational incentive of conventional international relations theories paves the way for the notion of fear as an emotion. It is argued that the behaviour of states in international politics should be explained via their psychological and emotional aspects. The paper proposes to connect the arising of and experiencing fear with collective memory and the imagery entrenched in nations’ subconscious. It also proposes to distinguish the two levels of arising of and experiencing the emotion of fear, namely the attempt to consciously arouse fear and its nonconscious experience. On the first level, mnemonic-emotive agents consciously activate collective emotions via the nation’s collective memory. On the second, once the contents/imagery of the society’s subconscious are activated, the aroused emotions are nonconsciously experienced by the society. The paper offers a case study from the Lithuanian foreign policy: its relations with Russia. Discourse analysis of Lithuania-Russia relations, where President Dalia Grybauskaitė plays an active and important role in discourse formation, suggests that the formation of Lithuanian foreign policy, with regard to Russia, is affected by the emotion of fear.","PeriodicalId":252461,"journal":{"name":"Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/lfpr-2017-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The paper reflects on the conception of the phenomenon of fear employed in the international relations theory. A critique of understanding of fear as a rational incentive of conventional international relations theories paves the way for the notion of fear as an emotion. It is argued that the behaviour of states in international politics should be explained via their psychological and emotional aspects. The paper proposes to connect the arising of and experiencing fear with collective memory and the imagery entrenched in nations’ subconscious. It also proposes to distinguish the two levels of arising of and experiencing the emotion of fear, namely the attempt to consciously arouse fear and its nonconscious experience. On the first level, mnemonic-emotive agents consciously activate collective emotions via the nation’s collective memory. On the second, once the contents/imagery of the society’s subconscious are activated, the aroused emotions are nonconsciously experienced by the society. The paper offers a case study from the Lithuanian foreign policy: its relations with Russia. Discourse analysis of Lithuania-Russia relations, where President Dalia Grybauskaitė plays an active and important role in discourse formation, suggests that the formation of Lithuanian foreign policy, with regard to Russia, is affected by the emotion of fear.
无理性的恐惧:立陶宛外交政策中的情绪
摘要本文对国际关系理论中恐惧现象的概念进行了反思。对将恐惧理解为传统国际关系理论的理性激励的批评,为恐惧作为一种情感的概念铺平了道路。有人认为,国家在国际政治中的行为应该从他们的心理和情感方面来解释。本文建议将恐惧的产生和经历与集体记忆和国家潜意识中根深蒂固的意象联系起来。它还建议区分恐惧情绪的产生和体验的两个层次,即有意识地唤起恐惧的尝试和它的无意识体验。在第一个层面上,助记情绪代理通过国家的集体记忆有意识地激活集体情绪。第二,一旦社会潜意识的内容/意象被激活,被唤起的情感就会被社会无意识地体验。本文提供了立陶宛外交政策的一个案例:立陶宛与俄罗斯的关系。对立陶宛与俄罗斯关系的话语分析表明,立陶宛对俄罗斯外交政策的形成受到恐惧情绪的影响。达利亚·格里包斯凯特斯总统在话语形成中发挥了积极而重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信