Selected issues of Al Hadith sciences in which Imam Ibn Katheer disagreed with Imam Ibn al-Salah in his Book “The Shortening of of Al Hadith Sciences”:
A comparative study
{"title":"Selected issues of Al Hadith sciences in which Imam Ibn Katheer disagreed with Imam Ibn al-Salah in his Book “The Shortening of of Al Hadith Sciences”:\nA comparative study","authors":"Ali Mohammed Sulaiman Fareed Alobaidi","doi":"10.37940/rjis.2022.2.2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Al-Hafiz Ibn Katheer summarized Ibn Al-Salah’s book titled (muqadimat abn alsalah) in the sciences of Al hadith. Although he summarized what he explained, however he was not satisfied with summarizing it only, but Ibn Kathir had his own opinions in which Ibn Al-Salah disagreed with. The issues they disagreed with reached eighteen. This research deals with the study of three models of those issues, which are: (1) judging the validity of the hadith based on the validity of its chain of transmission, (2) Judging on Al hadiths of the Mustadrak by the ruler Abi Abdullah, and (3) Judging on the novel of the innovator who does not atone his innovation.","PeriodicalId":345101,"journal":{"name":"Researcher Journal For Islamic Sciences","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Researcher Journal For Islamic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37940/rjis.2022.2.2.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Al-Hafiz Ibn Katheer summarized Ibn Al-Salah’s book titled (muqadimat abn alsalah) in the sciences of Al hadith. Although he summarized what he explained, however he was not satisfied with summarizing it only, but Ibn Kathir had his own opinions in which Ibn Al-Salah disagreed with. The issues they disagreed with reached eighteen. This research deals with the study of three models of those issues, which are: (1) judging the validity of the hadith based on the validity of its chain of transmission, (2) Judging on Al hadiths of the Mustadrak by the ruler Abi Abdullah, and (3) Judging on the novel of the innovator who does not atone his innovation.
哈菲兹·伊本·凯瑟总结了伊本·萨拉赫在圣训科学中的著作《muqadimat abn alsalah》。虽然他总结了他所解释的内容,但是他并不满足于仅仅总结,但是伊本·凯希尔有他自己的观点,而伊本·萨拉赫不同意。他们不同意的问题达到了18个。本研究研究了这些问题的三种模式,即:(1)根据其传播链的有效性来判断圣训的有效性,(2)判断统治者阿比·阿卜杜拉(Abi Abdullah)的穆斯塔德拉克(Mustadrak)的圣训,以及(3)判断创新者的小说而不补偿他的创新。