Views and Tendencies of Introducing Computational Thinking in Australian Schools [Research in Progress]

Dorian Stoilescu
{"title":"Views and Tendencies of Introducing Computational Thinking in Australian Schools [Research in Progress]","authors":"Dorian Stoilescu","doi":"10.28945/4348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose: This paper discusses theoretical and curricular aspects of computational thinking in curriculum and challenges noticed on introducing recent ICT perspectives in Australian Schools.\n\nBackground: It presents the way computational thinking is defined and understood in curriculum documents and a set of relatively new implementations that were de-signed nationally and in the New South Wales state. \n\nMethodology: This paper uses qualitative research methods such as content analysis and text analysis methods.\nContribution This research analyzes some recent trends in introducing computational thinking and explore the was these reforms are described in the official documents. \n\nFindings: It was noticed that although the importance of computational thinking was highly emphasized, the documents cannot describe a consistent implementation of this set of educational policies, as at this time implementing computational thinking largely underperforming.\n\nRecommendations for Practitioners: It is recommended a more systemic way of designing policies and curriculum content for the integration of computational thinking in Australian schools.\n\nFuture Research: Future research needs to explore reasons for delaying these reforms of introduc-ing computational thinking.","PeriodicalId":249265,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 InSITE Conference","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 InSITE Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: This paper discusses theoretical and curricular aspects of computational thinking in curriculum and challenges noticed on introducing recent ICT perspectives in Australian Schools. Background: It presents the way computational thinking is defined and understood in curriculum documents and a set of relatively new implementations that were de-signed nationally and in the New South Wales state. Methodology: This paper uses qualitative research methods such as content analysis and text analysis methods. Contribution This research analyzes some recent trends in introducing computational thinking and explore the was these reforms are described in the official documents. Findings: It was noticed that although the importance of computational thinking was highly emphasized, the documents cannot describe a consistent implementation of this set of educational policies, as at this time implementing computational thinking largely underperforming. Recommendations for Practitioners: It is recommended a more systemic way of designing policies and curriculum content for the integration of computational thinking in Australian schools. Future Research: Future research needs to explore reasons for delaying these reforms of introduc-ing computational thinking.
澳大利亚学校引入计算思维的观点与趋势[研究进展]
目的/目的:本文讨论了课程中计算思维的理论和课程方面,以及在澳大利亚学校引入最新ICT观点时注意到的挑战。背景:它展示了计算思维在课程文件中的定义和理解方式,以及在全国和新南威尔士州设计的一套相对较新的实施方法。研究方法:采用内容分析法、文本分析法等定性研究方法。本研究分析了最近引入计算思维的一些趋势,并探讨了这些改革在官方文件中的描述。研究发现:值得注意的是,尽管计算思维的重要性被高度强调,但文件无法描述这组教育政策的一致实施,因为此时实施计算思维在很大程度上表现不佳。对实践者的建议:建议采用一种更系统的方式来设计政策和课程内容,以便在澳大利亚学校中整合计算思维。未来研究:未来的研究需要探索延迟引入计算思维的这些改革的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信