Mutation Testing for Artificial Neural Networks: An Empirical Evaluation

Lorenz Klampfl, Nour Chetouane, F. Wotawa
{"title":"Mutation Testing for Artificial Neural Networks: An Empirical Evaluation","authors":"Lorenz Klampfl, Nour Chetouane, F. Wotawa","doi":"10.1109/QRS51102.2020.00054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Testing AI-based systems and especially when they rely on machine learning is considered a challenging task. In this paper, we contribute to this challenge considering testing neural networks utilizing mutation testing. A former paper focused on applying mutation testing to the configuration of neural networks leading to the conclusion that mutation testing can be effectively used. In this paper, we discuss a substantially extended empirical evaluation where we considered different test data and the source code of neural network implementations. In particular, we discuss whether a mutated neural network can be distinguished from the original one after learning, only considering a test evaluation. Unfortunately, this is rarely the case leading to a low mutation score. As a consequence, we see that the testing method, which works well at the configuration level of a neural network, is not sufficient to test neural network libraries requiring substantially more testing effort for assuring quality.","PeriodicalId":301814,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS51102.2020.00054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Testing AI-based systems and especially when they rely on machine learning is considered a challenging task. In this paper, we contribute to this challenge considering testing neural networks utilizing mutation testing. A former paper focused on applying mutation testing to the configuration of neural networks leading to the conclusion that mutation testing can be effectively used. In this paper, we discuss a substantially extended empirical evaluation where we considered different test data and the source code of neural network implementations. In particular, we discuss whether a mutated neural network can be distinguished from the original one after learning, only considering a test evaluation. Unfortunately, this is rarely the case leading to a low mutation score. As a consequence, we see that the testing method, which works well at the configuration level of a neural network, is not sufficient to test neural network libraries requiring substantially more testing effort for assuring quality.
人工神经网络的突变检测:一个经验评价
测试基于人工智能的系统,特别是当它们依赖于机器学习时,被认为是一项具有挑战性的任务。在本文中,我们考虑使用突变测试来测试神经网络,从而应对这一挑战。以前的一篇论文着重于将突变测试应用于神经网络的配置,得出了突变测试可以有效使用的结论。在本文中,我们讨论了一个实质性扩展的经验评估,其中我们考虑了不同的测试数据和神经网络实现的源代码。特别地,我们讨论了在只考虑测试评价的情况下,一个突变的神经网络在学习后是否能与原始的神经网络区分开来。不幸的是,这种情况很少会导致低突变分数。因此,我们看到测试方法,它在神经网络的配置级别上工作得很好,不足以测试神经网络库,需要大量的测试工作来保证质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信