[A comparative study of the longacting neuroleptics perphenazin-enanthate and fluspirilene (author's transl)].

J Tegeler, L Floru
{"title":"[A comparative study of the longacting neuroleptics perphenazin-enanthate and fluspirilene (author's transl)].","authors":"J Tegeler,&nbsp;L Floru","doi":"10.1055/s-0028-1094631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The clinical profile and side-effects of perphenazin-enanthate and fluspirilene were compared in 45 female chronic schizophrenic patients. 100 mg perphenazin-enanthate fortnightly or 8 mg fluspirilene weekly were administered. During the four months' period the psychopathological and somatic symptoms were evaluated by means of the AMP-system and the self-evaluation scale PD-S (v. Zerssen). A covariance analysis was carried out covering 12 AMP syndromes and 6 PD-S factors. The antipsychotic effect of both drugs was similar concerning the paranoid, the hallucinatory-desintegrative and the catatonic syndromes. A significant difference with regard to perphenazin-enanthate was found in the AMP-syndromes of hostility, hypochondria, and autonomic symptoms. Neither drug induced any depression. In the self-rating scale, the factors anxiousness and depressivity were also significantly lower in the perphenazin-enanthate regime. The patients under perphenazin-enanthate required a smaller amount of antiparkinsonian drugs. The more pronounced sedative effect of perphenazin-enanthate can be recommended in hostile and restless schizophrenic patients, whereas fluspirilene should be given to inactive autistic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":76325,"journal":{"name":"Pharmakopsychiatrie, Neuro-Psychopharmakologie","volume":"12 5","pages":"357-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0028-1094631","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmakopsychiatrie, Neuro-Psychopharmakologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1094631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The clinical profile and side-effects of perphenazin-enanthate and fluspirilene were compared in 45 female chronic schizophrenic patients. 100 mg perphenazin-enanthate fortnightly or 8 mg fluspirilene weekly were administered. During the four months' period the psychopathological and somatic symptoms were evaluated by means of the AMP-system and the self-evaluation scale PD-S (v. Zerssen). A covariance analysis was carried out covering 12 AMP syndromes and 6 PD-S factors. The antipsychotic effect of both drugs was similar concerning the paranoid, the hallucinatory-desintegrative and the catatonic syndromes. A significant difference with regard to perphenazin-enanthate was found in the AMP-syndromes of hostility, hypochondria, and autonomic symptoms. Neither drug induced any depression. In the self-rating scale, the factors anxiousness and depressivity were also significantly lower in the perphenazin-enanthate regime. The patients under perphenazin-enanthate required a smaller amount of antiparkinsonian drugs. The more pronounced sedative effect of perphenazin-enanthate can be recommended in hostile and restless schizophrenic patients, whereas fluspirilene should be given to inactive autistic patients.

[长效抗精神病药奋那嗪-烯酸酯与氟替匹林的比较研究[作者译]。
对45例女性慢性精神分裂症患者的临床表现和副作用进行了比较。每两周给100mg奋那嗪-烯酸酯或每周给8mg氟替匹林。在4个月的时间里,采用AMP-system和PD-S (v. Zerssen)自评量表对精神病理和躯体症状进行评估。对12个AMP综合征和6个PD-S因子进行协方差分析。两种药物对偏执型、幻觉-解体型和紧张性症状的抗精神病作用相似。perphenazin-enanthate在敌意、疑病症和自主神经症状的amp综合征中有显著差异。这两种药物都没有引起抑郁症。在自评量表中,奋那嗪-烯酸组焦虑和抑郁因子也显著降低。服用奋那嗪-烯酸盐的患者需要较少的抗帕金森药物。perphenazin-enanthate的镇静效果更明显,可以推荐给敌对和不安的精神分裂症患者,而fluspirilene应该给不活跃的自闭症患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信