What Next After a Decade With Significant Advances in the Application of Ultradeep Azimuthal Resistivity Measurements?

F. Antonsen, B. Danielsen, Kåre Røsvik Jensen, Marta Prymak-Moyle, J. K. Lotsberg, Maria Emilia Teixeira De Oliveira, Monica Vik Constable
{"title":"What Next After a Decade With Significant Advances in the Application of Ultradeep Azimuthal Resistivity Measurements?","authors":"F. Antonsen, B. Danielsen, Kåre Røsvik Jensen, Marta Prymak-Moyle, J. K. Lotsberg, Maria Emilia Teixeira De Oliveira, Monica Vik Constable","doi":"10.30632/pjv63n6-2022a12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Equinor has played an important role in the last decade in the testing and development of ultradeep azimuthal resistivity (UDAR) measurements both for look-ahead and look-around applications. Today, UDAR technology is applied in more than 70% of Equinor’s high-angle or horizontal wells. In this paper, the authors will review the use of UDAR in Equinor over the last decade and highlight both successful use and real-time challenges related to the interpretation of the inversion results. UDAR technology and inversion algorithms have been very powerful for reservoir mapping to geosteer or geostop according to plan. However, we forget far too often the fact that we need a good understanding of the reservoir to interpret and evaluate the uncertainty in the inversion result. The number one mistake in a real-time setting is to interpret a resistivity contrast as a specific layer in the reservoir (for instance, top reservoir) and hold on to that same interpretation, even if we drill away from that contrast and may cross multiple layers as distance to the observed contrast increases. Other challenging real-time UDAR exercises relate to uncertainties in the prediction of resistivity inside the reservoir and reservoir thickness from inversion results when still drilling above the reservoir. A third mistake often seen in real time is the detailed interpretation of one-dimensional (1D) inversion results, even when other indicators are pointing towards two-dimensional (2D)/three-dimensional (3D) complexities in the reservoir. Equinor and other operators have pushed for more and more advanced inversion solutions, leading to 3D mapping capabilities for more complex reservoirs. The UDAR advances over the last few years are important for Equinor’s planned roadmap ahead. However, 1D through 3D inversion results can result in bad decisions if the uncertainty in the inversion result is not managed correctly. We see a need to investigate how to best exploit UDAR technology and inversion results without extending assumptions beyond an acceptable uncertainty level. Better handling of uncertainties in geosteering operations will become increasingly important for the well economy with smaller targets, complex geological settings, and varying sweep efficiencies. How can we best handle the uncertainty in inversion results in real-time operations to avoid inaccurate decisions that can potentially destroy well economy? This is an important question that will be addressed and should be handled in the future if UDAR technology is to continue its important role in well placement in the next decades.","PeriodicalId":170688,"journal":{"name":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv63n6-2022a12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Equinor has played an important role in the last decade in the testing and development of ultradeep azimuthal resistivity (UDAR) measurements both for look-ahead and look-around applications. Today, UDAR technology is applied in more than 70% of Equinor’s high-angle or horizontal wells. In this paper, the authors will review the use of UDAR in Equinor over the last decade and highlight both successful use and real-time challenges related to the interpretation of the inversion results. UDAR technology and inversion algorithms have been very powerful for reservoir mapping to geosteer or geostop according to plan. However, we forget far too often the fact that we need a good understanding of the reservoir to interpret and evaluate the uncertainty in the inversion result. The number one mistake in a real-time setting is to interpret a resistivity contrast as a specific layer in the reservoir (for instance, top reservoir) and hold on to that same interpretation, even if we drill away from that contrast and may cross multiple layers as distance to the observed contrast increases. Other challenging real-time UDAR exercises relate to uncertainties in the prediction of resistivity inside the reservoir and reservoir thickness from inversion results when still drilling above the reservoir. A third mistake often seen in real time is the detailed interpretation of one-dimensional (1D) inversion results, even when other indicators are pointing towards two-dimensional (2D)/three-dimensional (3D) complexities in the reservoir. Equinor and other operators have pushed for more and more advanced inversion solutions, leading to 3D mapping capabilities for more complex reservoirs. The UDAR advances over the last few years are important for Equinor’s planned roadmap ahead. However, 1D through 3D inversion results can result in bad decisions if the uncertainty in the inversion result is not managed correctly. We see a need to investigate how to best exploit UDAR technology and inversion results without extending assumptions beyond an acceptable uncertainty level. Better handling of uncertainties in geosteering operations will become increasingly important for the well economy with smaller targets, complex geological settings, and varying sweep efficiencies. How can we best handle the uncertainty in inversion results in real-time operations to avoid inaccurate decisions that can potentially destroy well economy? This is an important question that will be addressed and should be handled in the future if UDAR technology is to continue its important role in well placement in the next decades.
在超深方位电阻率测量取得重大进展的十年后,下一步是什么?
在过去的十年中,Equinor在超深方位电阻率(UDAR)测量的测试和开发中发挥了重要作用,无论是向前还是四周的应用。如今,超过70%的Equinor大角度井或水平井采用了UDAR技术。在本文中,作者将回顾过去十年中UDAR在Equinor的应用,并重点介绍了UDAR的成功应用以及与反演结果解释相关的实时挑战。UDAR技术和反演算法在储层测绘中起到了非常强大的作用,可以根据计划进行地质导向或地质停止。然而,我们常常忘记了这样一个事实,即我们需要对储层有很好的了解,才能解释和评估反演结果中的不确定性。在实时设置中,最大的错误是将电阻率对比解释为储层中的特定层(例如,顶部储层),并坚持相同的解释,即使我们钻探远离该对比,并且随着距离观察到的对比的距离增加,可能会跨越多个层。其他具有挑战性的实时UDAR练习涉及在储层上方钻探时,根据反演结果预测储层内部电阻率和储层厚度的不确定性。第三个常见的错误是对一维(1D)反演结果的详细解释,即使其他指标指向油藏的二维(2D)/三维(3D)复杂性。Equinor和其他运营商一直在推动越来越先进的反演解决方案,为更复杂的储层提供3D测绘能力。过去几年的UDAR进展对Equinor未来的规划路线图非常重要。然而,如果反演结果中的不确定性处理不当,从一维到三维的反演结果可能导致错误的决策。我们认为有必要研究如何在不超出可接受的不确定性水平的情况下,最好地利用UDAR技术和反演结果。对于较小的目标、复杂的地质环境和不同的波及效率,更好地处理地质导向作业中的不确定性对于井的经济效益将变得越来越重要。在实时作业中,我们如何才能最好地处理反演结果中的不确定性,以避免可能破坏油井经济效益的不准确决策?如果UDAR技术要在未来几十年继续在井眼定位中发挥重要作用,这是一个需要解决和处理的重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信