Concomitant Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding and Hiatal Hernia Repair, A Retrospective Cohort Study

Z. Perry
{"title":"Concomitant Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding and Hiatal Hernia Repair, A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Z. Perry","doi":"10.13188/2377-9284.1000026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The recognition and management of diaphragmatic hernias during bariatric surgery remains a challenge and the need for its repair has changed during the last decade. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) is a viable solution for patients with a concomitant hiatal hernia discovered during surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study, which included the exposed group composed of patients who underwent LAGB between 2000 and 2016, with a concomitant hiatal hernia discovered during surgery. A control group was randomly chosen from a group of patients who underwent a primary LAGB between these years. The two groups were matched regarding basic demographic variables. Results: The study included 59 patients, 12 in the exposed group and 47 in the non-exposed (no hernia repair) group. In both groups, BMI decreased after the procedure without significant statistical differences. There was no significant difference in the BAROS score between the two groups. No pronounced difference was found in the general amount of post-surgical complications in the study group compared to the control group. Operating time was longer in the study group. Conclusion: Hiatal hernia repair during LAGB is as effective as primary LAGB without hiatal hernia. bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and the placement of adjustable gastric bands, all detected hiatal hernias should be repaired. But the level of evidence for these guidelines are considered not evidence based. We have shown in a previous study that the decision not to close a hiatal hernia discovered accidentally during LAGB, could have grave consequences [2]. The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons has also stated that laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair is as effective as open transabdominal repair, with a reduced rate of perioperative morbidity and with shorter hospital stays. It is the preferred approach for the majority of hiatal hernias, again with no real evidence for this. It seems that there is inadequate long-term data on which to base a recommendation either for or against the use of mesh at the hiatus. The ideal mesh, or way of hiatal closure, and technique are unknown at this point. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether hiatal hernia repair during a laparoscopic gastric band placement is a viable solution for patients with a concomitant hiatal hernia discovered during surgery.","PeriodicalId":139467,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obesity and Bariatrics","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obesity and Bariatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13188/2377-9284.1000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The recognition and management of diaphragmatic hernias during bariatric surgery remains a challenge and the need for its repair has changed during the last decade. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) is a viable solution for patients with a concomitant hiatal hernia discovered during surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study, which included the exposed group composed of patients who underwent LAGB between 2000 and 2016, with a concomitant hiatal hernia discovered during surgery. A control group was randomly chosen from a group of patients who underwent a primary LAGB between these years. The two groups were matched regarding basic demographic variables. Results: The study included 59 patients, 12 in the exposed group and 47 in the non-exposed (no hernia repair) group. In both groups, BMI decreased after the procedure without significant statistical differences. There was no significant difference in the BAROS score between the two groups. No pronounced difference was found in the general amount of post-surgical complications in the study group compared to the control group. Operating time was longer in the study group. Conclusion: Hiatal hernia repair during LAGB is as effective as primary LAGB without hiatal hernia. bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and the placement of adjustable gastric bands, all detected hiatal hernias should be repaired. But the level of evidence for these guidelines are considered not evidence based. We have shown in a previous study that the decision not to close a hiatal hernia discovered accidentally during LAGB, could have grave consequences [2]. The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons has also stated that laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair is as effective as open transabdominal repair, with a reduced rate of perioperative morbidity and with shorter hospital stays. It is the preferred approach for the majority of hiatal hernias, again with no real evidence for this. It seems that there is inadequate long-term data on which to base a recommendation either for or against the use of mesh at the hiatus. The ideal mesh, or way of hiatal closure, and technique are unknown at this point. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether hiatal hernia repair during a laparoscopic gastric band placement is a viable solution for patients with a concomitant hiatal hernia discovered during surgery.
腹腔镜下可调节胃束带和裂孔疝修补术的回顾性队列研究
背景:在减肥手术中膈疝的识别和处理仍然是一个挑战,在过去的十年中,对其修复的需求发生了变化。本研究的目的是评估腹腔镜下可调节胃束带(LAGB)对于手术中发现的伴有裂孔疝的患者是否是可行的解决方案。方法:回顾性队列研究,纳入2000年至2016年期间行LAGB手术并在手术中发现并发裂孔疝的暴露组。从这些年间经历过原发性LAGB的一组患者中随机选择一组对照组。这两组在基本人口统计变量上是匹配的。结果:共纳入59例患者,暴露组12例,未暴露组(无疝修补)47例。两组患者术后BMI均有所下降,但无统计学差异。两组患者BAROS评分差异无统计学意义。与对照组相比,研究组术后并发症的总体数量没有明显差异。实验组手术时间更长。结论:裂孔疝修补术与无裂孔疝的原发性裂孔疝修补术效果相同。旁路手术、袖式胃切除术和可调节胃束的放置,所有发现裂孔疝都应进行修复。但这些指南的证据水平被认为是没有证据基础的。我们在之前的一项研究中表明,在LAGB期间意外发现的裂孔疝,如果决定不关闭,可能会产生严重的后果[2]。美国胃肠和内窥镜外科学会也指出,腹腔镜裂孔疝修补术与开放式经腹修补术一样有效,而且围手术期发病率更低,住院时间更短。这是大多数裂孔疝的首选方法,同样没有真正的证据证明这一点。似乎没有足够的长期数据作为支持或反对在间歇期使用网格的建议的基础。理想的补片或裂孔闭合方式和技术目前尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估在腹腔镜胃带置入术中修补裂孔疝对手术中发现的伴有裂孔疝的患者是否可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信