A Max-Min Approach to the Output Evaluation of Knowledge Interaction

Travis K. Huang, E. Huang
{"title":"A Max-Min Approach to the Output Evaluation of Knowledge Interaction","authors":"Travis K. Huang, E. Huang","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2009.531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of knowledge management has been flowering as information management matures. Nevertheless, up until now, more attention has been focused on knowledge management inside organizations and less on knowledge management across organizational boundaries. Attempting to fill this gap and address the problems of cross-boundary knowledge management, this research first identified key boundary objects in the context of knowledge management, and then studies how actors from different organizations interact through boundary objects. The result links the performance of collaborative acts to the frequency of boundary object encountering in the course of interaction. In this study, although the context is described with \"actors\" in mind, the unit of analysis is \"knowledge\" itself, rather than \"actors,\" and the interaction is termed \"knowledge interaction\". Student assignments of information system projects serve as the cases of analysis. To analyze the performance of ten types of knowledge interactions, a max-min approach is applied, with one output factor, namely project performance, and four input factors, which are the frequencies of the encountering of four boundary objects. The result strongly suggests that identifying, creating, and facilitating useful boundary objects is the key to successful projects. Whether tacit knowledge is converted into explicit knowledge during the process is less important in achieving effective collaboration. Also, it is not always necessary to identify specific tacit knowledge in each organization.","PeriodicalId":211759,"journal":{"name":"2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","volume":"48 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2009.531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The concept of knowledge management has been flowering as information management matures. Nevertheless, up until now, more attention has been focused on knowledge management inside organizations and less on knowledge management across organizational boundaries. Attempting to fill this gap and address the problems of cross-boundary knowledge management, this research first identified key boundary objects in the context of knowledge management, and then studies how actors from different organizations interact through boundary objects. The result links the performance of collaborative acts to the frequency of boundary object encountering in the course of interaction. In this study, although the context is described with "actors" in mind, the unit of analysis is "knowledge" itself, rather than "actors," and the interaction is termed "knowledge interaction". Student assignments of information system projects serve as the cases of analysis. To analyze the performance of ten types of knowledge interactions, a max-min approach is applied, with one output factor, namely project performance, and four input factors, which are the frequencies of the encountering of four boundary objects. The result strongly suggests that identifying, creating, and facilitating useful boundary objects is the key to successful projects. Whether tacit knowledge is converted into explicit knowledge during the process is less important in achieving effective collaboration. Also, it is not always necessary to identify specific tacit knowledge in each organization.
知识交互输出评价的最大-最小方法
随着信息管理的成熟,知识管理的概念也逐渐成熟。然而,到目前为止,人们对组织内部知识管理的关注较多,对跨组织边界知识管理的关注较少。为了填补这一空白,解决跨界知识管理的问题,本研究首先确定了知识管理背景下的关键边界对象,然后研究不同组织的行动者如何通过边界对象进行交互。研究结果将协同行为的表现与交互过程中边界对象相遇的频率联系起来。在本研究中,虽然语境是用“行动者”来描述的,但分析的单位是“知识”本身,而不是“行动者”,这种互动被称为“知识互动”。信息系统项目的学生作业作为分析案例。为了分析十种类型的知识交互的性能,采用了最大最小方法,其中一个输出因素即项目绩效,四个输入因素即四个边界对象的相遇频率。结果强烈表明,识别、创建和促进有用的边界对象是项目成功的关键。在此过程中,隐性知识是否转化为显性知识,对于实现有效的协作并不重要。此外,并不总是需要在每个组织中识别特定的隐性知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信