On allocation of the transmission network losses using game theory

M. Bockarjova, M. Zima, G. Andersson
{"title":"On allocation of the transmission network losses using game theory","authors":"M. Bockarjova, M. Zima, G. Andersson","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2008.4579072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of key elements of liberalized markets being faced by consumer is a transparent cost structure of electricity supply. Part of this cost corresponds to the coverage of losses in the network. Several approaches to loss allocation exist, most commonly such as, charging in proportion to consumed energy or location marginal pricing. The first method fails to accurately link the consumption with the cause of losses. The second approach tends to be very sensitive to the change of parameters of the problem. Therefore, they do not fully satisfy criteria imposed on an allocation method: transparency and fairness. According to game theory, a fair and a transparent allocation of cost can be achieved using a concept of Shapley value. This paper presents a methodology and studies some properties of loss allocation mechanism using Shapley value.","PeriodicalId":118618,"journal":{"name":"2008 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2008.4579072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

One of key elements of liberalized markets being faced by consumer is a transparent cost structure of electricity supply. Part of this cost corresponds to the coverage of losses in the network. Several approaches to loss allocation exist, most commonly such as, charging in proportion to consumed energy or location marginal pricing. The first method fails to accurately link the consumption with the cause of losses. The second approach tends to be very sensitive to the change of parameters of the problem. Therefore, they do not fully satisfy criteria imposed on an allocation method: transparency and fairness. According to game theory, a fair and a transparent allocation of cost can be achieved using a concept of Shapley value. This paper presents a methodology and studies some properties of loss allocation mechanism using Shapley value.
基于博弈论的输电网损耗分配研究
消费者面临的自由化市场的关键因素之一是电力供应的透明成本结构。这部分费用对应于网络中损失的覆盖范围。目前存在几种损失分配方法,最常见的是按能耗比例收费或按地点边际定价。第一种方法不能准确地将消耗与损失的原因联系起来。第二种方法往往对问题参数的变化非常敏感。因此,它们不能完全满足分配方法的标准:透明度和公平性。根据博弈论,利用Shapley值的概念可以实现公平透明的成本分配。本文提出了一种方法,并利用Shapley值研究了损失分配机制的一些性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信