Radical Change in Faculty and Student Evaluation: A Justifiable Heresy?.

Jeffery Gentry
{"title":"Radical Change in Faculty and Student Evaluation: A Justifiable Heresy?.","authors":"Jeffery Gentry","doi":"10.5929/2011.1.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses the connection between two continuing trends in higher education: semester evaluation of faculty by students (SE’s) and grade inflation. The two phenomena are explored historically; then a two-part plan is proposed to enhance the evaluation of both students and faculty. This solution does not replace current evaluation practices; it merely\nadds information on each student’s relative performance. Although subject to criticism as radical reform, the plan is offered as a feasible check on grade inflation and diminished student responsibility—one that is consistent with long held higher education values, as well as recent calls for increased educational accountability. The author concludes that such efforts\noffer hope in reversing a set of disturbing trends in student achievement.\n\nKeywords: college grading, grade inflation, instructor evaluation, student achievement","PeriodicalId":189332,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Issues Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Issues Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5929/2011.1.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article addresses the connection between two continuing trends in higher education: semester evaluation of faculty by students (SE’s) and grade inflation. The two phenomena are explored historically; then a two-part plan is proposed to enhance the evaluation of both students and faculty. This solution does not replace current evaluation practices; it merely adds information on each student’s relative performance. Although subject to criticism as radical reform, the plan is offered as a feasible check on grade inflation and diminished student responsibility—one that is consistent with long held higher education values, as well as recent calls for increased educational accountability. The author concludes that such efforts offer hope in reversing a set of disturbing trends in student achievement. Keywords: college grading, grade inflation, instructor evaluation, student achievement
教师和学生评价的根本变化:一个正当的异端?
本文探讨了高等教育中两种持续趋势之间的联系:学生对教师的学期评价和成绩膨胀。这两种现象在历史上得到了探讨;在此基础上,提出了两部分方案,以提高学生和教师的评价。这个解决方案不能取代当前的评估实践;它只是增加了每个学生相对表现的信息。尽管被批评为激进的改革,但该计划被认为是对分数膨胀和学生责任感降低的一种可行的检查,这与长期以来的高等教育价值观是一致的,也是最近呼吁增加教育责任的。作者的结论是,这些努力为扭转学生成绩方面的一系列令人不安的趋势带来了希望。关键词:高校评分;成绩膨胀;教师评价
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信