Evaluation of Fatigue’s Effect and Severity in Hemodialysis Patients

S. Mıstık, D. Unalan, Humeyra Aslaner, B. Tokgoz
{"title":"Evaluation of Fatigue’s Effect and Severity in Hemodialysis Patients","authors":"S. Mıstık, D. Unalan, Humeyra Aslaner, B. Tokgoz","doi":"10.33880/ejfm.2022110208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effect and severity of fatigue levels in hemodialysis patients.\n\nMethods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 130 patients who applied to Hemodialysis units between 01 November-01 December 2019. Piper Fatigue Scale, Fatigue Impact Scale, and Fatigue Severity Scale were used as data collection tools. In statistical analysis, Student's t-test and variance analysis were used. Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the relationship between the variables. \n\nResults: It is found that hemodialysis patients got the highest score on Piper Fatigue Scale from Piper Fatigue Scale - Affect (5.48±2.85) and patients felt moderately tired. Of the patients, 43.1% stated that ‘dialysis’ was the most important reason that contributes directly or causes their fatigue, and 23.1% stated that the best thing they found to reduce their fatigue was to sleep. Hemodialysis patients got the highest score on the Fatigue Impact Scale from the psychosocial (35.42±18.67) effect dimension. The mean score of the patients' Fatigue Impact Scale was 4.84±1.93. The Piper Fatigue Scale - Behavior, Piper Fatigue Scale - Affective, Piper Fatigue Scale - Sensory and Piper Fatigue Scale - Cognitive Dimension Scores, Fatigue Impact Scale - Cognitive, Fatigue Impact Scale - Physical and Fatigue Impact Scale - Psychosocial Dimension and Fatigue Impact Scale Total Scores and Fatigue Severity Scale Scores in Chronic Renal Failure patients with a chronic disease were significantly higher than in patients without chronic disease. The Fatigue Impact Scale - Cognitive, Fatigue Impact Scale - Physical, and Fatigue Impact Scale - Psychosocial dimensions, Fatigue Impact Scale total scores, and Fatigue Severity Scale scores in patients diagnosed with anemia were significantly higher than in those without anemia.\n\nConclusion: In our study, patients over 65 years of age and those with chronic diseases other than Chronic Renal Failure had higher levels and greater impact and severity of fatigue.\n\nKeywords: dialysis, fatigue, severity, hemodialysis","PeriodicalId":436322,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33880/ejfm.2022110208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the effect and severity of fatigue levels in hemodialysis patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 130 patients who applied to Hemodialysis units between 01 November-01 December 2019. Piper Fatigue Scale, Fatigue Impact Scale, and Fatigue Severity Scale were used as data collection tools. In statistical analysis, Student's t-test and variance analysis were used. Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the relationship between the variables. Results: It is found that hemodialysis patients got the highest score on Piper Fatigue Scale from Piper Fatigue Scale - Affect (5.48±2.85) and patients felt moderately tired. Of the patients, 43.1% stated that ‘dialysis’ was the most important reason that contributes directly or causes their fatigue, and 23.1% stated that the best thing they found to reduce their fatigue was to sleep. Hemodialysis patients got the highest score on the Fatigue Impact Scale from the psychosocial (35.42±18.67) effect dimension. The mean score of the patients' Fatigue Impact Scale was 4.84±1.93. The Piper Fatigue Scale - Behavior, Piper Fatigue Scale - Affective, Piper Fatigue Scale - Sensory and Piper Fatigue Scale - Cognitive Dimension Scores, Fatigue Impact Scale - Cognitive, Fatigue Impact Scale - Physical and Fatigue Impact Scale - Psychosocial Dimension and Fatigue Impact Scale Total Scores and Fatigue Severity Scale Scores in Chronic Renal Failure patients with a chronic disease were significantly higher than in patients without chronic disease. The Fatigue Impact Scale - Cognitive, Fatigue Impact Scale - Physical, and Fatigue Impact Scale - Psychosocial dimensions, Fatigue Impact Scale total scores, and Fatigue Severity Scale scores in patients diagnosed with anemia were significantly higher than in those without anemia. Conclusion: In our study, patients over 65 years of age and those with chronic diseases other than Chronic Renal Failure had higher levels and greater impact and severity of fatigue. Keywords: dialysis, fatigue, severity, hemodialysis
血液透析患者疲劳效果及严重程度的评价
目的:本研究旨在评价血液透析患者疲劳水平的影响和严重程度。方法:对2019年11月1日至12月1日在血液透析单位就诊的130例患者进行横断面研究。使用Piper疲劳量表、疲劳影响量表和疲劳严重程度量表作为数据收集工具。统计分析采用Student’st检验和方差分析。计算Pearson相关系数来评价变量之间的关系。结果:血透患者在Piper Fatigue Scale - Affect得分最高(5.48±2.85),患者感到中度疲劳。43.1%的患者表示,“透析”是直接导致疲劳的最重要原因,23.1%的患者表示,他们发现减轻疲劳的最佳方法是睡觉。血液透析患者疲劳影响量表在心理社会影响维度上得分最高(35.42±18.67)。患者疲劳影响量表平均得分为4.84±1.93分。慢性肾衰竭合并慢性疾病患者的疲劳量表-行为、疲劳量表-情感、疲劳量表-感觉和疲劳量表-认知维度得分、疲劳影响量表-认知、疲劳影响量表-身体和疲劳影响量表-心理社会维度和疲劳影响量表总分和疲劳严重程度量表得分显著高于无慢性疾病患者。在疲劳影响量表-认知、疲劳影响量表-身体和疲劳影响量表-心理社会维度、疲劳影响量表总分和疲劳严重程度量表中,诊断为贫血的患者明显高于无贫血的患者。结论:在我们的研究中,65岁以上的患者和慢性肾衰竭以外的慢性疾病患者的疲劳水平更高,影响更大,严重程度更高。关键词:透析;疲劳;严重程度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信