KEWENANGAN LEMBAGA MASYARAKAT ADAT TERHADAP PERSELISIHAN SENGKETA ADAT DI KAMPUNG TOMER, KABUPATEN MERAUKE

Thimon Febby, Nasri Wijaya
{"title":"KEWENANGAN LEMBAGA MASYARAKAT ADAT TERHADAP PERSELISIHAN SENGKETA ADAT DI KAMPUNG TOMER, KABUPATEN MERAUKE","authors":"Thimon Febby, Nasri Wijaya","doi":"10.35724/SJIAS.V7I01.976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to find out how far the laws and regulations govern the authority of indigenous peoples in resolving customary disputes. The research method used in this study is Sociolegal. This research is a study that looks at law through a combination of normative analysis (legal norms, juridical) and non-legal science approaches. Socio-legal nature is prescriptive Giving solutions to legal problems by combining normative analysis and non-legal approaches / social aspects. The authority between the Marind Imbuti Indigenous Peoples Institution and the Marind Indigenous Peoples Institution Community of Kanum Tomer is the Marind Imbuti Indigenous Peoples Institution having the authority to carry out customary justice for each tribe / community in the disputed indigenous community while the customary community does not have the authority to conduct customary hearings for each member of the tribe disputes but all customary justice mechanisms carried out by the Marind Imbuti Community Institution and the Marind Kanum Indigenous Community as regulated in Article 10 of Perdasus Number 20 of 2008 cannot yet be legally accounted for because they are not in accordance with the instructions of article 10 paragraph (2) of Perdasus Number 20 Year 2008. Keywords: Indigenous Peoples Institutions, Indigenous Disputes","PeriodicalId":312787,"journal":{"name":"Societas : Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Sosial","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societas : Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Sosial","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35724/SJIAS.V7I01.976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out how far the laws and regulations govern the authority of indigenous peoples in resolving customary disputes. The research method used in this study is Sociolegal. This research is a study that looks at law through a combination of normative analysis (legal norms, juridical) and non-legal science approaches. Socio-legal nature is prescriptive Giving solutions to legal problems by combining normative analysis and non-legal approaches / social aspects. The authority between the Marind Imbuti Indigenous Peoples Institution and the Marind Indigenous Peoples Institution Community of Kanum Tomer is the Marind Imbuti Indigenous Peoples Institution having the authority to carry out customary justice for each tribe / community in the disputed indigenous community while the customary community does not have the authority to conduct customary hearings for each member of the tribe disputes but all customary justice mechanisms carried out by the Marind Imbuti Community Institution and the Marind Kanum Indigenous Community as regulated in Article 10 of Perdasus Number 20 of 2008 cannot yet be legally accounted for because they are not in accordance with the instructions of article 10 paragraph (2) of Perdasus Number 20 Year 2008. Keywords: Indigenous Peoples Institutions, Indigenous Disputes
这项研究的目的是查明法律和条例在多大程度上支配土著人民解决习惯争端的权力。本研究采用的研究方法是Sociolegal。这项研究是一项通过规范分析(法律规范,司法)和非法律科学方法相结合来看待法律的研究。社会法律性质是规范性的,通过结合规范分析和非法律方法/社会方面来解决法律问题。Marind Imbuti土著人民机构和carum Tomer的Marind土著人民机构社区之间的权威是Marind Imbuti土著人民机构有权为有争议的土著社区中的每个部落/社区执行习惯司法,而习惯社区无权为部落争端的每个成员进行习惯听证会,但所有习惯司法机制都由Marind执行2008年第20号珀达索斯文件第10条规定的Imbuti社区机构和Marind Kanum土著社区尚未得到法律解释,因为它们不符合2008年第20号珀达索斯文件第10条第(2)款的指示。关键词:原住民制度、原住民纠纷
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信