Nonviolent Communal Strategies in Insurgencies Case Study on Afghanistan

C. Zürcher
{"title":"Nonviolent Communal Strategies in Insurgencies Case Study on Afghanistan","authors":"C. Zürcher","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190056896.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In insurgencies, rural communities are the most vulnerable segment of society. Rural communities in Afghanistan are traditionally highly self-organized and capable of collective action. It is therefore reasonable to assume that communities will make collective efforts to minimize the risks of getting harmed. Using qualitative and survey data, this chapter investigates this proposition and shows that three strategies are often used and believed by respondents to be effective: negotiating with armed groups, neutrality, and self-defense. It describes these strategies and highlights the conditions under which they may be more or less effective. It then discusses how external actors can inadvertently reduce the space for such civil actions and make communities less safe, and what can be done to avoid this.","PeriodicalId":400257,"journal":{"name":"Civil Action and the Dynamics of Violence","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Action and the Dynamics of Violence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190056896.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In insurgencies, rural communities are the most vulnerable segment of society. Rural communities in Afghanistan are traditionally highly self-organized and capable of collective action. It is therefore reasonable to assume that communities will make collective efforts to minimize the risks of getting harmed. Using qualitative and survey data, this chapter investigates this proposition and shows that three strategies are often used and believed by respondents to be effective: negotiating with armed groups, neutrality, and self-defense. It describes these strategies and highlights the conditions under which they may be more or less effective. It then discusses how external actors can inadvertently reduce the space for such civil actions and make communities less safe, and what can be done to avoid this.
暴乱中的非暴力社区策略——以阿富汗为例
在叛乱中,农村社区是社会中最脆弱的部分。阿富汗的农村社区传统上是高度自我组织的,有能力采取集体行动。因此,有理由认为,社区将共同努力,尽量减少受到伤害的风险。利用定性和调查数据,本章调查了这一命题,并表明三种策略经常被使用,并被受访者认为是有效的:与武装团体谈判,中立和自卫。它描述了这些策略,并强调了它们可能或多或少有效的条件。然后讨论了外部行为者如何在不经意间减少此类民事行动的空间,使社区更不安全,以及可以采取哪些措施来避免这种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书