Jetoanele medievale din ceramică: utilităţi cu multiple dubii de interpretare / Medieval Ceramic Jetons: A Use with Multiple Doubts of Interpretation

A. Rusu
{"title":"Jetoanele medievale din ceramică: utilităţi cu multiple dubii de interpretare / Medieval Ceramic Jetons: A Use with Multiple Doubts of Interpretation","authors":"A. Rusu","doi":"10.55201/mayw5353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Archaeological excavations conducted in the Benedictine monastery from Frumuşeni (Bizere, Arad County) brought to light eight ceramic circular pellets which were made from damaged vessels, six of these have a central perforation. During an interval of approximately one millennium these could be found spread over a wide geographic area and were made from a variety of materials with specific forms. One part of these belong to the category of recycled materials. A convenient interpretation would have categorized these as ‘spindle whorls’ at least the ones with a central hole. One can find a generous literature discussing these however it is still short and superficial. Less researched are the iconographic representations but these cannot supply conclusive elements because of the small dimensions of the components of the whorls of the spindle. In addition, the ethnographic reality drastically limits the existence of the independent part demonstrating that the independent part disappeared merged in the wooden spindle and was taken over by the spinning wheel. The study discusses the materials, dimensions, marks or decorations, contexts of discovery, the number of objects or the contradictions between the interpretations of the same materials. As a general conclusion one can state that the safest would be not to automatically provide a certain or exclusive function to these forms. The context of Bizere as a monastery, where monks lived and worked would be in contradiction with the spinning. The re-analysis of the published groups lead firstly to the recognition of two groups of use in which we have subgroups and independent pieces. According to the same primary classification the disproportioned versions are also discussed, through which the archaeological finds could originate from decorative pieces (the second interpretation version) such as: rosaries (3), amulets (4), fittings or fibulas (5), buttons (6), pellets for games with marked surface (7), whirligig (8), and various facilities for weaving excluding spinning (9), fishing weights (10), drilling components (11), abacus pieces (12), wheels for toys (13), various dagger guards (14), corks (15), mosaic parts (16), weights for scales (17), rubbers for erasing wax tablets (18), stamps for wafers (19), supports for alchemical samples (20), modeling tools for pottery (21), rafts (22), compass stands (23), remains from other damaged objects but unused (24). The final conclusions is that for the context of the Benedictine abbey from Bizere the discovered finds are most unlikely spindle whorls but more probably jetons used for games. The topic opens up like a tree and implies continuous pondering on the useful forms even in the case of archaeological units considered insignificant or easily classifiable.","PeriodicalId":154867,"journal":{"name":"Analele Banatului XXIV 2016","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analele Banatului XXIV 2016","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55201/mayw5353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Archaeological excavations conducted in the Benedictine monastery from Frumuşeni (Bizere, Arad County) brought to light eight ceramic circular pellets which were made from damaged vessels, six of these have a central perforation. During an interval of approximately one millennium these could be found spread over a wide geographic area and were made from a variety of materials with specific forms. One part of these belong to the category of recycled materials. A convenient interpretation would have categorized these as ‘spindle whorls’ at least the ones with a central hole. One can find a generous literature discussing these however it is still short and superficial. Less researched are the iconographic representations but these cannot supply conclusive elements because of the small dimensions of the components of the whorls of the spindle. In addition, the ethnographic reality drastically limits the existence of the independent part demonstrating that the independent part disappeared merged in the wooden spindle and was taken over by the spinning wheel. The study discusses the materials, dimensions, marks or decorations, contexts of discovery, the number of objects or the contradictions between the interpretations of the same materials. As a general conclusion one can state that the safest would be not to automatically provide a certain or exclusive function to these forms. The context of Bizere as a monastery, where monks lived and worked would be in contradiction with the spinning. The re-analysis of the published groups lead firstly to the recognition of two groups of use in which we have subgroups and independent pieces. According to the same primary classification the disproportioned versions are also discussed, through which the archaeological finds could originate from decorative pieces (the second interpretation version) such as: rosaries (3), amulets (4), fittings or fibulas (5), buttons (6), pellets for games with marked surface (7), whirligig (8), and various facilities for weaving excluding spinning (9), fishing weights (10), drilling components (11), abacus pieces (12), wheels for toys (13), various dagger guards (14), corks (15), mosaic parts (16), weights for scales (17), rubbers for erasing wax tablets (18), stamps for wafers (19), supports for alchemical samples (20), modeling tools for pottery (21), rafts (22), compass stands (23), remains from other damaged objects but unused (24). The final conclusions is that for the context of the Benedictine abbey from Bizere the discovered finds are most unlikely spindle whorls but more probably jetons used for games. The topic opens up like a tree and implies continuous pondering on the useful forms even in the case of archaeological units considered insignificant or easily classifiable.
在frumueni(比泽尔,阿拉德县)的本笃会修道院进行的考古发掘发现了八个由损坏的容器制成的陶瓷圆形颗粒,其中六个有中心穿孔。在大约一千年的间隔期间,这些可以在广泛的地理区域内找到,并且由各种具有特定形式的材料制成。其中一部分属于回收材料的范畴。一个方便的解释将这些归类为“主轴轮”至少有一个中心孔。人们可以找到大量的文献讨论这些,但它仍然是简短和肤浅的。研究较少的是图像表示,但这些不能提供结论性的元素,因为小尺寸的组件的主轴的螺纹。此外,民族志现实极大地限制了独立部分的存在,表明独立部分消失了,合并在木锭中,被纺车所取代。该研究讨论了材料、尺寸、标记或装饰、发现的背景、物体的数量或对同一材料的解释之间的矛盾。作为一个一般的结论,我们可以说,最安全的做法是不要自动为这些表单提供某种或排他性的功能。比泽尔作为修道院的背景,僧侣们在那里生活和工作,这与纺纱是矛盾的。对已发表的群体的重新分析首先导致了对两个使用群体的认识,其中我们有子群体和独立的部分。根据同样的主要分类,还讨论了不相称的版本,通过这些版本,考古发现可能来自装饰件(第二种解释版本),例如:念珠(3),护身符(4),配件或fibulas(5),纽扣(6),带有标记表面的游戏小球(7),旋转装置(8),以及各种编织设备,不包括纺纱(9),钓鱼砝码(10),钻孔组件(11),算盘件(12),玩具轮子(13),各种匕首护套(14),软木塞(15),马赛克部件(16),天平砝码(17),用于擦蜡片的橡胶(18),硅片印章(19),炼金术样品支撑(20),陶器建模工具(21),木筏(22),指南针架(23),其他损坏物品的残余物(24)。最后的结论是,在比泽尔本笃会修道院的背景下,发现的东西最不可能是纺锤轮,而更可能是用于游戏的jetons。这个话题像树一样开放,意味着对有用形式的持续思考,即使是在被认为微不足道或容易分类的考古单位的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信